Analysis of two methods indicating the shoulder joint angles using three dimensional data

• Authors: Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska , Michal Dekundy , Edyta Lukasik , Jakub Smolka
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article contains a comparative analysis of two methods of calculating angles in the shoulder joint of the right upper limb. For the purposes of this study, a marker -vector method was developed that calculates angles based on retroreflective 3D marker’s positions and vectors created on the basis of their positions. Movements from two types of sports (sword fighting and tennis forehand) were analysed. These movem ents were recorded using an optical motion capture system. The obtained results were compared with the values read from the Plug -in Gait biomechanical model from C3D files. The results show that the proposed method is more universal and can be used indepen dently. In addition, the Plug -in Gait model is not adequate for the analysis of the acquired shoulder angles of tennis players.

Keywords

EN

C3D file; Plug-in Gait biomechanical model; angle calculation methods; motion capture

• Publisher: Institute of Physical Education and Tourism. Jan Długosz University of Czestochowa
• Journal: Physical Activity Review
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 6
• Pages: 37-44

Contributors

author

Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska

• Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology

author

Michal Dekundy

• Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology

author

Edyta Lukasik

• Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology

author

Jakub Smolka

• Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology

References

• 1. Kopniak P, Kaminski M. Natural interface for robotic arm controlling based on inertial motion capture. 9th International Conference on Human System Interactions, New York. IEEE 2016: 110-116.
• 2. Pueo B, Jimenez-Olmedo J. M. Application of motion capture technology for sport performance analysis. Federación Española de Asociaciones de Docentes de Educación Física (FEADEF) 2016: 241-247.
• 3. Wasik J. Kinematics and Kinetics of Taekwon-do Side Kick. Journal of Human Kinetics 2011; 30:13-20. doi: 10.2478/v10078-011-0068.
• 4. Wasik J, Shan GB. Factors influencing the effectiveness of axe kick in taekwon-do. Archives of Budo 2014; 10:29-36.
• 5. Ortenburger D, Wąsik J, Góra T. Selected dimensions of the self- esteem and a kinematic effect of the intentional target at taekwondo athletes. Arch Budo Sci Martial Art Extreme Sport 2016; 12: 117-121.
• 6. Yu DF, Yu YG, Wilde B, et al. Biomechanical characteristics of the Axe Kick in Tae Kwon-Do. Archives of Budo, 8(4): 213-218.
• 7. Preuschl E., Hassmann M., Baca A. A Kinematic Analysis of the Jumping Front-Leg Axe-Kick in Taekwondo. Journal of Sports Science And Medicine 2016; 15(1): 92-101.
• 8. Skublewska -Paszkowska M. Motion Repeatability of Tennis Forehand Preparation Phase Without the Ball Using Three Dimensional Data. Proceedings of 38th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology (ISAT 2017); 17- 19 September 2 017; Szklarska Poręba, POLAND. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 656: 156 -165. doi: 10.1007/978- 3-319 -67229 -8_14.
• 9. Skublewska -Paszkowska M., Lukasik E., Montusiewicz J. Analysis of rowing based on handle trajectory. Procedings of the 9th Inter national Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI); 6 -8 July 2016; Portsmouth, UK. Conference on Human System Interaction: 62 -68.
• 10. Stambolian D., Asfour S., Eltoukhy M. Using Vicon Bodybuilder and Plug -In -Gait to Generate L5/S1 Angles, Forces and Mome nts; 1 -4 march 2014; Big Sky, MT. 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference: 1 -7.
• 11. Kainz H, Modenese L, Lloyd D G, et al. Joint kinematic calculation based on clinical direct kinematic versus inverse kinematic gait model. Journal of Biomechanics 2016; 49: 1658- 1669.
• 12. Nair SP , Gibbs S, Arnold G , et al. A method to cjnalculate the centre of the ankle joint: A comparison with the Vicon Plug -in-Gait model . Clinical Biomechanics 2010; 25: 582- 587.
• 13. Daniilidis K , Jakubowitz E , Thomann A , et al. Does a foot -drop implent improv e kinetic and kinematic parameters in the foot and ankle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017; 137: 499- 506.
• 14. Krumm D , Cockcroft J , Zaumseil F , Odenwald S. Analytical evaluation of the effects of inconsistent anthropometric measurements on joint kinematics in moti on capturing. Gait & Posture 2016; 46: 1- 4.
• 15. Rigney SM, Simmons A , Kark L. A prosthesis- specific multi -link segment model of lower -limb amputee sprinting, Journal of Biomechanics 2016; 49: 3185- 3193.
• 16. Yalamanchili SB, Surapaneni SB, Wang W, et al. The evaluation of foot joint angles and forces during walking, J. Evolution Med. Dent. Sci. 2017 ; 6(2): 124- 131.
• 17. VICON, 2016. Plug-in Gait Product Guide [WWW Document]. VICON. URL https://www.vicon.com/downloads/documentation/plug -in-gait -product -guide (accessed 20. 10.2017).
• 18. Skublewska -Paszkowska M , Lukasik E, Smolka J. et al. Comprehensive measurements of human motion parameters in research projects. Procedings of the 10th International Technology, Education and Development Conference INTED, 6 -9 March 2016, Valencia, Spain : IATED Academy 2016: 8597- 8605.
• 19. Koziel G. Simplified Steganographic Algorithm Based on Fourier Transform . Advanced Science Letters 2014; 20( 2): 505- 509. doi : 10.1166/as1.2014.5322.
• 20. Bajd T, Mihelj M, Munih M. Introduction to Robotics. Spring er 2013.
• 21. Klimkiewicz J. Wiliams G, Sher J. et. al. The acromioclavicular capsule as a restraint to posterior translation of the clavicle: A biomechanical analysis. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg 1991; 8: 181- 192.

• Document Type: paper