Comparison of physical activity of children in a state kindergarten and a forest kindergarten in the Czech Republic

• Authors: Dita Culková , Lucie Francová , Ivan Růžička , Dana Urbanová , Jan Suk

Abstracts

EN

Introduction: This study compares physical activity of children in a state kindergarten and a forest kindergarten, particularly the number of steps taken, which can indicate the quantity of physical activity. The objective is to monitor the number of steps taken by children in selected institutions and to conduct an analysis in relation to the structure of the daily programme and movement regimen of these institutions contributing thus to the discussion concerning physical literacy formation among preschool children. Methods: The study is of a descriptive non-intervention character using mechanical pedometers. The sample consists of 73 children (36 in the state kindergarten, 37 in the forest kindergarten). The data are processed using a nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and Cohen's d. Results: At the significance level of 0.05 it was discovered that children from the forest kindergarten take significantly more steps in the observed period than children from the state kindergarten. The Zscore is -4.357 and p < 0.001. Substantive significance for the level of physical activity measured by the number of steps is high. Cohen's d = (532057-354714)/133355.005729 = 1.33. Conclusion: Physical literacy is influenced by both the quality of physical activity and the quantity, which was larger in the forest kindergarten. This may be related to the amount of spontaneous physical activity and the frequency and length of trips. However, controlled physical activities in the state kindergarten, especially morning exercise, can improve the quality and increase physical literacy as well. There is a need for a competent approach of teachers, sensitive inclusion of physical activities in the daily programme with emphasis on internal motivation, and awareness of benefits and drawback of both spontaneous physical activity and controlled activities represented by regular morning exercise.

Keywords

EN

preschool education; pedometer; movement regimen; spontaneous physical activity

• Publisher: Institute of Physical Education and Tourism. Jan Długosz University of Czestochowa
• Journal: Physical Activity Review
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 9
• Pages: 120-129

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Dita Culková

• University of Hradec Králové, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000000262271442

author

Lucie Francová

• University of Hradec Králové, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Czech Republic

author

Ivan Růžička

• University of Hradec Králové, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000000240167652

author

Dana Urbanová

• University of Hradec Králové, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/0000000306242265

author

Jan Suk

• University of Hradec Králové, Department of English Language and Literature, Czech Republic

• https://orcid.org/000000016008956X

References

• 1. Sigmund E, Sigmundová D. Pohybová aktivita pro podporu zdravı́ dětı́ a mlá dež e [Physical Activity to Support Health of Children and Youth]. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci; 2011 [in Czech]
• 2. Machová J and Kubá tová D. Vý chova ke zdravı́ [Education Towards Health]. Praha: Grada; 2015 [in Czech]
• 3. Kalman M, Hamřı́k Z, Pavelka J. Podpora pohybové aktivity: pro odbornou veřejnost [Physical Activity Support for Professional Public]. Olomouc: ORE-institut; 2009 [in Czech]
• 4. Trö ndle P. Wellness: domá cı́ rozmazlová nı́ [Wellness: Domestic Pampering]. Praha: Grada; 2008 [in Czech]
• 5. Vašíčková J. Pohybová gramotnost v České republice [Physical Literacy in the Czech Republic]. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci; 2016 [in Czech]
• 6. Mužík V, Šeráková H, Janošková H. (2019). Abeceda pohybové aktivity dětí [Alphabet of children´s physical activity]. Masarykova univerzita v Brně: Elportál; 2019 [in Czech].
• 7. Vošahlı́ková T. Ekoškolky a lesnı́ mateřské školy: praktický manuá l pro aktivnı́ rodiče, pedagogy a zřizovatele mateřský ch škol [Eco-Kindergartens and Forest Kindergartens: Practical Handbook for Active Parents, Pedagogues, and Promoters]. Praha: Ministerstvo ž ivotnı́ho prostředı́; 2012 [in Czech]
• 8. Coe HA. Embracing risk in the Canadian woodlands: Four children's risky play and risk-taking experiences in a Canadian Forest Kindergarten. J Early Child Res 2016; 15(4): 374-388. doi: 10.1177/1476718X15614042
• 9. Elliott S, Chancellor B. From Forest Preschool to Bush Kinder: An Inspirational Approach to Preschool Provision in Australia. Australas J Early Child 2014; 39(4): 45-53. doi: 10.1177/183693911403900407
• 10. Culková D, Francová L. Sonda do pohybové aktivity dětí ve státních mateřských školách, v lesních mateřských školách a v dětských lesních klubech [A Probe Into a Physical Activity of Children In State Kindergartens, Forest Kindergartens and Childrens Forest Clubs]. Tělesná kultura 2020; 43(1):16-25. doi: 10.5507/tk.2020.008 [in Czech]
• 11. Smolíková K. Rámcový vzdělávací program pro předškolní vzdělávání [Framework Education Program for Preschool Education]. Praha: Výzkumný ústav pedagogický; p15; 2018 [in Czech]
• 12. Dvořá ková H. Didaktika tělesné vý chovy nejmenšı́ch dětı́ a dětı́ s hendikepy [Physical Education Didactics for Youngest Children and Disabled Children]. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Pedagogická fakulta; 2000 [in Czech]
• 13. Borová B, Trpišovská D, Skoumalová S, Smejkalová V. Cvičıḿe s malý mi dětmi: ná měty pro rozvoj pohybový ch dovednostı́ dětı́ od 3 do 8 let [Exercising with Young Children: Topics for Movement Development Activities among Children]. Praha: Portál; 1998 [in Czech]
• 14. Stone MR, Faulkner GE. Outdoor play in children: associations with objectively-measured physical activity, sedentary behavior and weight status. Prev Med 2014; 65:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.05.008.
• 15. Chawla L, Keena K, Pevec I, Stanley E. Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health Place 2014; 28:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001
• 16. Mustapa ND, Maliki, NZ, Hamzah, A. Repositioning Children's Developmental Needs in Space Planning: A Review of Connection to Nature. Procd Soc Behv Sci 2015; 170: 330-339. doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015 .01.043
• 17. Dvořá ková H. Pohybem a hrou rozvı́jı́me osobnost dı́těte [Movement and Games to Children Personality Development: Physical Education in Kindergarten Educational Programmes. 2nd ed.]. Praha: Portá l; 2011 [in Czech]
• 18. Sigmund E. Pohybová aktivita dětı́ a jejich integrace prostřednictvı́m 60 pohybový ch her [Children's Physical Activity and Its Integration via 60 pgysical games]. Olomouc: Hanex; 2007 [in Czech]
• 19. Louie L, Chan L. The Use of Pedometry to Evaluate the Physical Activity Levels among Preschool Children in Hong Kong. Early Child Dev Care 2003;173(1): 97-107. doi: 10.1080/0300443022000022459
• 20. McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Nader PR, Broyles SL, Nelson JA. Anglo- and Mexican-American preschoolers at home and at recess: Activity patterns and environmental influences. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1992; 13(3): 173-180.
• 21. Michek S. Advantages and Disadvantages of Forest Kindergarten in Czech Republic, Procd Soc Behv Sci 2015; 171: 738-744. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.186
• 22. Pastucha D. Pohyb v terapii a prevenci dětské obezity [Physical Activity in Therapy and Prevention of Child Obesity]. Praha: Grada; 2011 [in Czech]
• 23. Koťá tková S. Hry v mateřské škole v teorii a praxi: význam hry, role pedagoga, cı́l hry, soubor her praxi [Kindergarten Games in Theory and Practice]. Praha: Grad; 2005 [in Czech]
• 24. Bednářová J, Šmardová V, Šmarda R. Diagnostika dítěte předškolního věku. 2. vydání. [Preschool Children Diagnosis. 2nd ed]. Praha: Albatros Media; 2015 [in Czech]
• 25. Svobodová E. Vzdělá vá nı́ v mateřské škole: školnı́ a třı́dnı́ vzdělá vacı́ program [Kindergarten Education - School and Class Education Program]. Praha: Portá l; 2010 [in Czech]
• 26. Tanaka C, Tanaka S. Daily physical activity in japanese preschool children evaluated by triaxial accelerometry: the relationship between period of engagement in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and daily step counts. J Physiol Anthropol 2009; 28(6): 283-288. doi: 10.2114/jpa2.28.283
• 27. Vale S, Trost SG, Duncan MJ, Mota J. Step based physical activity guidelines for preschool-aged children, Prev Med 2015; 70:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.11.008
• 28. Craemer MD, Decker ED, Bourdeaudhuij ID, Verloigne M, Manios Y, Cardon G. The translation of preschoolers' physical activity guidelines into a daily step count target. J Sport Sci 2014; 33(10): 1051- 1057. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.981850
• 29. Svobodová L, Vaculı́ková P, Hlavoň ová Z, Skotá ková A, CČihounková J, Bugala M, et al. Trendy v realizaci pohybové aktivity dětı́ mateřských škol a 1. stupně zá kladnı́ch škol [Trends in Movement Realization among Kindergarten and First-Grade Children]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita; 2015 [in Czech]
• 30. Má ček M and Radvanský J. Fyziologie a klinické aspekty pohybové aktivity [Physiology and Clinical Aspects of Physical Activity]. Praha: Galén; 2011 [in Czech]
• 31. Schlegel P. Závěrečný strečink v hodinách tělesné výchovy [Final Stretching in Physical Education]. Tělesná výchova a sport mládeže 2019; 85(4): 18-22 [in Czech]

Identifiers

DOI

10.16926/par.2021.09.28

Biblioteka Nauki

1933123