Różnice między kobietami i mężczyznami w zdolnościach przestrzennych

• Authors: Wanda Ciarkowska

Title variants

EN

Gender differences in spatial ability

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

Summary Differences between women and men in spatial ability are considered the most consistent gender differences in cognitive abilities. With traditional paper- and-pencil tests of spatial ability men performed significantly better on mental rotation tasks. However, inconsistent gender differences have been obtained on measures related to spatial orientation in the real world. It seems that men and women apply different strategies to find their way, e.g. women more likely rely on the knowledge whether to turn right or left at specified landmarks, whereas men orient themselves according to global reference points, such as the cardinal directions (North, South, East, and West) or the position of the sun in the sky. Some research programs try to identify the characteristics of those women who represent the exception to the male advantage found with the mental rotation test. It seems that math/science experience may contribute to the development of spatial ability in females. Also, there is increasing evidence suggesting that environmental factors play a role in shaping gender differences in spatial performance. For instance, males have more extensive experience with activities that help develop spatial skills (video games, spatial sport preferences) and boys have greater freedom than girls to explore their environments. Further research is necessary to delineate the conditions under which training of orientation tasks produces benefits for the performance of women.

• Journal: Kosmos
• Year: 2003
• Volume: 52
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 49-57

Dates

published

2003

Contributors

author

Wanda Ciarkowska

• Wydział Psychologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Stawki 5/7, 00-183 Warszawa, Polska

References

• ALEXANDER G. M., PACKARD M. G., PETERSON B. S., 2002. Sex and spatial position effects on object location memory following intentional learning of object identities. Neuropsychologia 40, 1516-1522.
• ALYMAN C., PETERS M., 1993. Performance of male and female children, adolescents and adults on spatial tasks that involve everyday objects and settings. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 47, 730-747.
• ASHMORE R. D., 1990. Sex, gender, and the individual. [W:] PERVIN L.A., (red.). Handbook of personality: theory and research. Guilford Press, New York, 486-525.
• BOWERS C. A. LABARBA R. C., 1988. Sex differences in the lateralization of spatial abilities: a spatial component analysis of extreme group scores. Brain Cogn. 8, 165-177.
• BROSNAN M. J., 1998. Spatial ability in children´s play with lego blocks. Percept. Mot. Skills 87, 19-28.
• BURNS P. C., 1998. Wayfinding errors while driving. J. Environ. Psychol. 18, 209-217.
• CASEY M. B., 1996. Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: a nature/ nurture interactionist framework. Dev. Rev. 16, 241-260.
• CIARKOWSKA W., 1998. Płeć a funkcjonowanie poznawcze człowiekazdolności matematyczne oraz inteligencja: część II. Psychologia Wychowawcza XLI, 289-304.
• CUTMORE T. R. H., HINE T. J., MABERLY K. J., LANGFORD N. M., HAWGOOD G., 2000. Cognitive and gender factors influencing navigation in a virtual environment. Int. J. Human-Comput. Studies 53, 223-249.
• DABBS J. M., CHANG E.-L., STRONG R. A., MILUN R., 1998. Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evol. Hum. Behav. 19, 89-98.
• DUFF S. J.,HAMPSON E., 2001. A sex difference on a novel spatial working memory task in humans. Brain Cogn. 47, 470-493.
• DURNDELL A. HAAG Z., LAITHWAITE H., 2000. Computer self efficacy and gender: a cross cultural study of Scotland and Romania. Pers. Individ. Dif. 28, 1037-1044.
• GALEA L. A.,KIMURA D., 1993. Sex differences in route-learning. Pers. Individ. Dif. 14, 53-65.
• GEARY D. C., 1995. Sexual selection and sex differences in spatial cognition. Learn. Individ. Dif. 7, 289-301.
• GOLDSTEIN D., HALDANE D., MITCHELL C., 1990. Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: the role of performance factors. Mem. Cogn. 18, 546-550.
• GRABOWSKA A., 2001. Neurobiologiczne korelaty róż- nic psychicznych między płciami. [W:] Umysł i zachowanie z perspektywy psychologii i innych nauk. NĘCKA E., KRZYŻEWSKI K. (red.). Wyd. Instytutu Psychologii PAN, Warszawa, 45-77.
• GRIMSHAW G. M., SITARENIOS G., FINEGAN J.A., 1995. Mental rotation at 7 years: relations with prenatal testosterone level and spatial play experiences. Brain Cogn. 29, 85-100.
• HALPERN D. F., 1992. Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Lawrence Erblaum Publ., Hillsdale, N. J.
• HAMEL C. J., RYAN-JONES D. L., 1997. Effect of visual detail on scene recognition: some unexpected sex differences. Percept. Mot. Skills 84, 619-626.
• HARRELL W. A., BOWBLY J. W., HALL-HOFFARTH D., 2000. Directing wayfinders with maps: the effects of gender, age, route complexity, and familiarity with the environment. J. Soc. Psychol. 140, 169-178.
• HUANG J., 1993. An investigation of gender differences in cognitive abilities among Chinese high school students. Pers. Individ. Dif. 15, 717-719.
• KASS S. J., AHLERS R. H., DUGGER M., 1998. Eliminating gender differences through practice in an applied visual spatial task. Hum. Perform. 11, 337-349.
• KING J., BOND T., BLANDFORD S., 2002. An investigation of computer anxiety by gender and grade. Comput. Human Behav. 18, 69-84.
• LAWTON C. A., 1994. Gender differences in way-finding strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles 30, 765-779.
• LAWTON C. A., 2001. Gender and regional differences in spatial referents used in direction giving. Sex Roles 44, 321-337.
• LAWTON C. A., MORRIN K. A., 1999. Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer-simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles 40, 73-92.
• LI CH., NUTTALL R.L., ZHU W., 1999a. Writing Chinese characters and success on mental rotation test. Percept. Mot. Skills 88, 1261-1270.
• LI CH., NUTTALL R.L., ZHAO S., 1999b. The effect of writing Chinese characters on success on the water- level task. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 30, 91-105.
• LI CH., NUTTALL R.L., ZHAO S., 1999c. A test of the Piagetan water-level task with Chinese students. J. Genet.
• Psychol. 160, 369-380.
• LUTZ J.,MEANS L. W., LONG T. E., 1994. Where did I park? A naturalistic study of spatial memory. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 439-451.
• MATTHEWS M. H., 1986. The influence of gender on the environmental cognition of young boys and girls. J. Genet. Psychol. 147, 295-302.
• MCBURNEY D. H., GAULIN S. J. C., DEVINENI T., ADAMS CH., 1997. Superior spatial memory of women: stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis. Evol. Hum. Behav. 18, 165-174.
• MOFFAT S., HAMPSON E., HATZIPANTELIS M., 1998. Navigation in a 'virtual' maze: sex differences and correlation with psychometric measures of spatial ability in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 19, 73-87.
• PHILLIPS C. A., ROLLS S., ROUSE A., GRIFFITHS M. D., 1995. Home video game playing in schoolchildren: a study of incidence and patterns of play. J. Adolesc. 18, 687-691.
• RESNICK S. M., 1993. Sex differences in mental rotations: an effect of time limits? Brain Cogn. 21, 71-79.
• ROBERTS J. E., BELL M. A., 2000a. Sex differences on a mental rotation task: variations in electroencephalogram hemispheric activation between children and college students. Dev. Neuropsychol. 17, 199-223.
• ROBERTS J. E., BELL M. A., 2000b. Sex differences on a computerized mental rotation task disappear with computer familiarization. Percept. Mot. Skills 91, 1027-1034.
• SCALI R. M., BROWNLOW S., HICKS J. L., 2000. Gender differences in spatial task performance as a function of speed or accuracy orientation. Sex Roles 43, 359-376.
• SHARPS M. J., PRICE J. L., WILLIAMS J. K., 1994. Spatial cognition and gender. Psychol. Women Q. 18, 413-425.
• SILVERMAN I., CHOI J., MACKEWN A., FISHER M., MORO J., OLSHANSKY E., 2000. Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding: further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial differences. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21, 201-213.
• SNYDER P. J.,HARRIS L. J., 1996. Where in the worldamI? Sex and handedness differences in knowledge of geography. Percept. Mot. Skills 82, 1379-1385.
• STUMPF H., ELIOT J., 1995. Gender-related differences in spatial ability and the k factor of general spatial ability in a population of academically talented students. Pers. Individ. Dif. 19, 33-45.
• SUBRAHMANYAM K., GREENFIELD P. M., 1994. Effect of video game practice on spatial skills in girls and boys. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 15, 13-32.
• THOMPSON S. H., LIM T., LIM V., 2000. Gender differences in internet usage and task preferences. Comput. Hum. Behav. 17, 95-110.
• VANDENBERG S. G., KUSE A. R., 1978. Mental rotations: a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.
• Percept. Mot. Skills 47, 599-601.
• VASTA R., LIBEN L. S., 1996. The water-level task: an intriguing puzzle. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 5, 171-177.
• VOYER D., VOYER S., BRYDEN M. P., 1995. Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: ameta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychol. Bull. 117, 250-270.
• VOYER D., NOLAN C., VOYER S., 2000. The relation between experience and spatial performance in men and women. Sex Roles 11/12, 129-153.
• WATSON N. V., KIMURA D., 1991. Nontrivial sex differences in throwing and intercepting: relation to psychometrically- defined spatial functions. Pers. Individ. Dif. 12, 375-385.