Comparison of Mechanical Behaviour of Carbon and Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites

• Authors: N. Ozsoy , A. Mimaroğlu , M. Ozsoy , M. Ozsoy
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

An experimental study has been carried out to investigate tensile and bending properties of carbon fiber (CFRE) and glass fiber-reinforced (GFRE) epoxy composites. Three different fiber orientations were applied, 0°, 90° and [0°, 90°]. The laminates were obtained by manual lay-up process. The samples were evaluated by tensile tests according to the ASTM D3039 and bending tests according to the ASTM D790. Experimental results showed that maximum tensile strengths were observed at 0° fiber direction for the both CFRE and GFRE composites. With respect to their tension properties, the CFRE samples had better performance than the GFRE samples, except for the 90° orientation. Three point bending tests proved that in all orientations CFRE composites had better performance, compared to GFRE composites.

Keywords

EN

81.05.Qk; 81.70.Bt

Discipline

• 81.05.Qk: Reinforced polymers and polymer-based composites
• 81.70.Bt: Mechanical testing, impact tests, static and dynamic loads(see also 62.20.M- Structural failure of materials; 46.50.+a Fracture mechanics, fatigue, and cracks)

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 127
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 1032-1034

Dates

published

2015-04

Contributors

author

N. Ozsoy

• Sakarya University, Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Serdivan/Sakarya, Turkey

author

A. Mimaroğlu

• Sakarya University, Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Serdivan/Sakarya, Turkey

author

M. Ozsoy

• Sakarya University, Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Serdivan/Sakarya, Turkey

author

M. Ozsoy

• Sakarya University, Faculty of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Serdivan/Sakarya, Turkey

References

• [1] P.K. Mallick, Fiber Reinforced Composites, Markel Dekker, New York, 1993
• [2] J.M.L. Reis, J.L.V. Coelho, A.H. Monteiro, H.S. Da Costa Mattos, Composites: Part B 43, 2041 (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.02.005
• [3] A. Godara, D. Raabe, Composites Science and Technology 67, 2417 (2007), doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.005
• [4] M.M. Shokrieh, M.J. Omidi, Composite Structures 88, 595 (2009), doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.012
• [5] J.M. Faulstich De Paiva, S. Mayer, M. Cerqueira Rezende, Materials Research 9, 83 (2006), doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392006000100016
• [6] ASTM D3039, D3039M-08, Standard Test Method For Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials, American Society For Testing and Material, 2008, doi: 10.1520/D3039_D3039M-14
• [7] ASTM D790-10, Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials, American Society for Testing and Material, 2010, doi: 10.1520/D0790-10
• [8] H. Gu, Materials and Design 27, 1086 (2006), doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2005.03.012

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.127.1032