Exact Ground States of Frustrated Spin-1 Ising-Heisenberg and Heisenberg Ladders in a Magnetic Field

• Authors: J. Strečka , F. Michaud , F. Mila
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Ground states of the frustrated spin-1 Ising-Heisenberg two-leg ladder with Heisenberg intra-rung coupling and only Ising interaction along legs and diagonals are rigorously found by taking advantage of local conservation of the total spin on each rung. The constructed ground-state phase diagram of the frustrated spin-1 Ising-Heisenberg ladder is then compared with the analogous phase diagram of the fully quantum spin-1 Heisenberg two-leg ladder obtained by density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations. Both investigated spin models exhibit quite similar magnetization scenarios, which involve intermediate plateaux at one-quarter, one-half and three-quarters of the saturation magnetization.

Keywords

EN

05.50.+q; 75.10.Jm; 75.10.Kt; 75.60.Ej

Discipline

• 75.10.Kt: Quantum spin liquids, valence bond phases and related phenomena
• 75.60.Ej: Magnetization curves, hysteresis, Barkhausen and related effects(for hysteresis in ferroelectricity, see 77.80.Dj)
• 05.50.+q: Lattice theory and statistics (Ising, Potts, etc.)(see also 64.60.Cn Order-disorder transformations, and 75.10.Hk Classical spin models)
• 75.10.Jm: Quantized spin models, including quantum spin frustration

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 126
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 24-25

Dates

published

2014-07

Contributors

author

J. Strečka

• Institute of Physics, Faculty of Science, P.J. Šafárik University, Park Angelinum 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia

author

F. Michaud

• Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

author

F. Mila

• Institute of Theoretical Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

References

• [1] M.T. Batchelor, X.W. Guan, N. Oelkers, Z. Tsuboi, Adv. Phys. 56, 465 (2007), doi: 10.1080/00018730701265383
• [2] M.P. Gelfand, Phys. Rev. B 43, 8644 (1991), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.8644
• [3] A. Honecker, F. Mila, M. Troyer, Eur. Phys. J. B 15, 227 (2000), doi: 10.1007/s100510051120
• [4] V. Ravi Chandra, N. Surendan, Phys. Rev. B 74, 024421 (2006), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.024421
• [5] F. Michaud, T. Coletta, S.R. Manmana, J.D. Picon, F. Mila, Phys. Rev. B 81, 014407 (2010), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.014407
• [6] J.H. Barry, M. Meisel, Phys. Rev. B 58, 3129 (1998), doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.3129
• [7] O. Rojas, J. Strečka, M. Lyra, Phys. Lett. A 377, 920 (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.02.013

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.126.24