Fabricating of Steel/Cast Iron Composite by Casting Route

• Authors: S. Ertürk , O. Çakır , L. Kumruoglu , A. Ozel
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this study, 1.2333 cold work tool steel and cast iron (GG 25) were simultaneously melted in different furnaces to fabricate composite die mold used in sheet metal forming industry. To enhance the metallurgical bond between two components of composite part, the pouring temperature of cast iron was assessed just above the solidus temperature, then metallurgically prepared cast iron was poured on to the cast tool steel. The temperature and casting parameters were monitored and simulated. Experimental and simulation results were compared, finally the optimum parameters and casting route were revealed.

Keywords

EN

47.11.-j; 81.20.Hy; 81.30.Fb; 81.05.Ni; 68.08.-p

Discipline

• 81.05.Ni: Dispersion-, fiber-, and platelet-reinforced metal-based composites
• 47.11.-j: Computational methods in fluid dynamics
• 81.30.Fb: Solidification
• 68.08.-p: Liquid-solid interfaces
• 81.20.Hy: Forming; molding, extrusion, etc.[see also, 83.50.Uv Material processing (extension, molding, etc.)]

• Publisher: Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Acta Physica Polonica A
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 125
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 452-453

Dates

published

2014-02

Contributors

author

S. Ertürk

• Faculty of Engineering, University of Sakarya, Esentepe, 54187, Turkey
• Faculty of Engineering, University of Sivas, Turkey

author

O. Çakır

• Faculty of Engineering, University of Sakarya, Esentepe, 54187, Turkey
• Faculty of Engineering, University of Sivas, Turkey

author

L. Kumruoglu

• Faculty of Engineering, University of Sakarya, Esentepe, 54187, Turkey
• Faculty of Engineering, University of Sivas, Turkey

author

A. Ozel

• Faculty of Engineering, University of Sakarya, Esentepe, 54187, Turkey
• Faculty of Engineering, University of Sivas, Turkey

References

• 1. Xiuling Su, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2001
• 2. Xinyu Zhou, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cincinnati, 2005
• 3. L. Guobin, W. Jianjun, L. Xiangzhi, L. Guiyun, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00318-X, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 75, 152 (1998)
• 4. L. Mehnen, H. Pfutzner, E. Kaniusas, doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00286-9, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215-216, 779 (2000)
• 5. J. Nakano, Y. Miwa, T. Tsukada, M. Kikuchi, S. Kita, Y. Nemoto, H. Tsuji, S. Jitsukawa, doi: 10.1016/S0022-3115(02)00965-0, J. Nucl. Mater. 307, 1568 (2002)
• 6. K.V. Sudakhar, doi: 10.1016/S1350-6307(00)00048-0, Eng. Failure Anal. 9, 221 (2002)
• 7. O. Yilmaz, H. Çelik, doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00029-3, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 141, 67 (2003)
• 8. B.V. Krishna, P. Venugopal, K.P. Rao, doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.025, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 407, 77 (2005)
• 9. U. Patel, S. Suresh, doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.01.047, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 299, 249 (2006)
• 10. D.C. Ko, S.K. Lee, B.M. Kim, H.H. Jo, H. Jo, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.131, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 186, 22 (2007)
• 11. M. Şimşir, L.C. Kumruoğlu, A. Özer, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.074, Mater. Des. 30, 264 (2009)

Identifiers

DOI

10.12693/APhysPolA.125.452