Sport beyond Moral Good and Evil

• Authors: Jerzy Kosiewicz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Sport is - and should be - an amoral phenomenon (what should not be confused with an immoral one); that is, a phenomenon which is completely independent from ethics, except of, possibly, deontological ethics which concerns professionals who have professional obligations towards their employers and other persons who are provided with and influenced by their services.Conduct according to rules of a given sport has no moral character. It has only pragmatic character, similarly as conduct in compliance with principles of the administrative code, the civil code or the penal code. Of course, when you act in accordance with rules of sports rivalry you can additionally realize also other aims - like, for example, aesthetic, spectacular or moral ones. However, in each case rules of the game and legal norms have priority, because they are the most important regulative determinant of conduct in various societies, including variously defined human teams. The above mentioned legal and sports regulations are not moral norms. They can, however, influence moral behaviours if they are in conflict with the law or rules of the game.From that viewpoint moral norms are exterritorial in their relation to assumptions and rules of a particular sport. Contestants and people responsible for them - like, for example, coaches or sports officials - as well as their employers are neither required to account for their moral beliefs, nor for their moral behaviours, if only they act in compliance with rules of sports rivalry.

Keywords

EN

sport; morality; good; evil

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 49
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 21-29

Dates

published

1 - 10 - 2010

online

16 - 12 - 2010

Contributors

author

Jerzy Kosiewicz

• Josef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Poland

References

• Allison, L. (2001). Amateurism in Sport: An Analysis and a Defence. London: Frank Cass.
• Bertalanffy von, L. (1973). General System Theory. New York: George Braziller.
• Butcher, R., Schneider, A. (2007). Fair Play as Respect for the Game. In W. J. Morgan (Ed.) Ethics in Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Cyceron (2010). Rozmowy tuskulańskie (Tusculan Disputations). In Rozmowy tuskulańskie i inne pisma (Tusculan Disputations and Other Writings). Warszawa: PWN.
• Digiel, H. (2004). The Principle of Fair Play - Why doping must never be allowed. Academic Supplement of Fair Play! The Official Publication of the European Fair Play Movement, 2, 6-8.
• Diogenes Laertios (1982). Żywoty i poglądy słynnych filozofów (Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers). Warszawa: PWN.
• Domański, J. (1966). Metamorfozy pojęcia filozofii (Metamorphoses of the Notion of Philosophy). Warszawa: Polska Akademia Nauk. Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii.
• Donskis, L. (2005). Fair Play and the Legacy of Don Quixote. Academic Supplement of Fair Play! The Official Publication of the European Fair Play Movement, 4, 4-5.
• Fraleigh, W. (2003). Intentional Rules Violations - One More Time. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, no. XXX.
• Fraleigh, W. (2007). Intentional Rules Violations - One More Time. In W. J. Morgan (Ed.) Ethics in Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Hume. D. (1947). Badania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego (Enquiry Concerning Human Understading). Kraków: PWN.
• Hume, D. (1963). Traktat o naturze ludzkiej (A Treatise of Human Nature). Warszawa: PWN.
• Hume, D. (1974). Związek konieczny (Necessary Connection). In S. Jedynak, Hume (1974). Warszawa: PW "Wiedza Powszechna".
• Jirasek, I. (2005). Fair play. In Filosoficka kinantropologie: setkani filosofie, ttela a pohybu. Olomouc: Vydala Univerzita Palackeho.
• Kosiewicz, J. (2004). Is the Principle of Fair Play the Highest Value in Sport? Academic Supplement of Fair Play! The Official Publication of the European Fair Play Movement, 4, 9-10.
• Kosiewicz, J. (2005). Is the Principle of Fair Play the Highest Value in Sport? - New Considerations. In J. Kosiewicz (Ed) (2005) Sport, Culture and Society. Warsaw: AWF.
• Kosiewicz, J. (2010). Physical Recreation in the Mirror of Philosophy. In J. Kosiewicz (2010). Sport and Philosophy: From Methodology to Ethics. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo BK.
• Kretchmar, R. S. (2005). Ethics, Value Choices, and the Good Life. In Practical Philosophy of Sport and Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Li-Hong (Leo), Hsu (2005). Revisiting Fair Play: Cheating, the ‘Good Foul’ and Sport Rules. Academic Supplement of Fair Play! The Official Publication of the European Fair Play Movement, 4.
• Loland, S. (2002). Fair play: historical anachronism or topical ideal. In M. J. McNamee, J. Perry (Eds.) Ethics & Sport. London and New York: Spon Press. Taylor & Francis Group.
• Loland, S. (2002). Fair play in Sport: A Moral Sport System. London & New York: Routledge.
• Morgan, W. J. (2006). Why sports morally matter. New York and London: Routledge.
• Malingrey, A. M. (1961). Philosophia. Etude d'un groupe de mots dans la literature grecque, des Presocratiques au IVt siecle apres J.-C. Paris.
• Palm, J. (2004). Sport for All! - Fair Play for All? Academic Supplement of Fair Play! The Official Publication of the European Fair Play Movement, 1, 1-2.
• Platon (1982). Obrona Sokratesa (Apology). In Uczta, Eutyfron, Obrona Sokratesa, Kriton, Fedon (Symposium, Euthyphro, Apology, Kriton, Phaedon). Warszawa: PWN.
• Renson, R. (2005). Fair Play, Fair Game, Lair Game, Fair Pay: Ethics versus Rhetoric in Sport and Society. Academic Supplement of Fair Play! The Official Publication of the European Fair Play Movement, 4.
• Simon, R. L. (2007). The Ethics of Strategic Fouling: A Reply to Fraleigh. In W. J. Morgan (Ed.) Ethics in Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
• Suchodolski, B. (1963). Bruno. In Narodziny nowożytnej filozofii człowieka (Birth of Modern Philosophy of Man). Warszawa: PWN.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10141-010-0012-2