Relationships between competitive anxiety, social support and self-handicapping in youth sport

• Authors: Agata Wężyk
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Study aim: To assess the level of self-handicapping tendency, competitive anxiety (trait) and social support within groups of young male and female athletes, as well as to determine the relationships between those variables.Material and methods: A group of 75 athletes (46 male football players and 29 female volleyball players) from Sport Mastery School in Łódź, aged 16 - 19 years, participated in the study. Three questionnaires were administered: Anticipative Strategy of Self-Esteem Protection Scale (ASO) to measure self-handicapping tendency, Social Support Scale (SWS) and Reactions to Competition (RnW), in order to measure the competition-related anxiety (trait).Results: Female athletes attained significantly higher scores in ASO and RnW while male players perceived their social support higher than girls. No significant correlations between self-handicapping and anxiety were found. Most of the observed relationships between self-handicapping and social support were negative, like those between anxiety and social support.Conclusions: It is advisable to work with young athletes on eliminating self-handicapping activities and replacing them with other, more efficient, ways of coping with anxiety. Social support (adequate to the athlete's needs) might be crucial in that proceeding. The hypothesis of relationship between sport competitive anxiety and self-handicapping was not confirmed, maybe due to the relatively small number of subjects.

Keywords

EN

Self-handicapping; Competitive anxiety; Social support; Team sports; Youth sport

• Publisher: Versita
• Journal: Biomedical Human Kinetics
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 3
• Pages: 72-77

Dates

published

1 - 1 - 2011

online

5 - 8 - 2011

Contributors

author

Agata Wężyk

• Noffer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Łódź, Poland

References

• Aronson E., T. Wilson, R. Akert (2010) Social Psychology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ.
• Bailis D. S. (2001) Benefits of self-handicapping in sport: A field study of university athletes. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 4:213-228.
• Berglas S., E. E. Jones (1978) Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 36:405-417.[Crossref]
• Carron A., H. Prapavessis, J. R. Grove (1994) Group effects and self-handicapping. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 16:246-257.
• Conroy D. E. (2003) Representational models associated with fear of failure in adolescents and young adults. J. Pers. 71: 757-784. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.7105003[Crossref]
• Cox R. (1998) Sport Psychology. Concepts and Applications. WCB McGraw-Hill, Boston.
• Doliński D., A. Szmajke (1994) Self-handicapping: advantages and disadvantages. PTP, Olsztyn.
• Ferrari J. R., J. S. Harriot, M. Zimmerman (1999) The social support networks of procrastinators: Friends or family in times of trouble? Pers. Ind. Differ. 26:321-331.
• Hanin Y. (2000) Emotions in Sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL.
• Hausenblas H. A., A. V. Carron (1996) Group cohesion and self-handicapping in female and male athletes. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 18:132-143.
• Hirt E. R., R. K. Deppe, L. J. Gordon (1991) Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: empirical evidence for theoretical distinction. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. 61:981-991.[Crossref]
• Kmiecik-Baran K. (1995) Social Support Scale: Its content and psychometric parameters. Psych. Rev. 38:201-214.
• Lavallee L., F. Flint (1996) The relationship of stress, competitive anxiety, mood state, and social support to athletic injury. J. Athl. Training 31:296-299.
• Lazarus, R., S. Folkman (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Pub. Co., New York
• Leahy T., F. Cheung (1995) Social support among Hong-Kong athletes. In: H. F. Fu, M. Ng (eds.) Sport Psychology: Perspectives and Practices Toward 21st Century. Hong-Kong Baptist University, Hong-Kong.
• Leary M. R. (1996) Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior. Westview Press, Boulder CO.
• Martens R., R. S. Vealey, D. Burton (1990) Competitive Anxiety in Sport. Human Kinetics, Champaign IL.
• Pommersbach J. (1988) Social support and illness. Psychol. Rev. 30:503-525.
• Prapavessis H., J. R. Grove, R. Maddison, N. Zillman (2003) Self-handicapping tendencies, coping and anxiety responses among athletes. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 4:357-375. DOI: 10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00020-1[Crossref]
• Rhodewalt F., A. T. Saltzman, J. Wittmer (1984) Self-handicapping among competitive athletes: The role of self-esteem protection. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 5:197-209.[Crossref]
• Rosenfeld L. B., J. M. Richman, C. J. Hardy (1989) Examining social support networks among athletes: Description and relationship to stress. Sport Psychol. 3:23-33.
• Treasure D. C., K. K. Kuczka (2005) Self-handicapping in competitive sport: influence of the motivational climate, self-efficacy and perceived importance. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 6:539-550. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.03.007[Crossref]
• Wann D. (1996) Sport Psychology. Prentice Hall, Boston MA.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10101-011-0016-3