Children's Step Counts on Weekend, Physical Education, and Non-Physical Education Days

• Authors: Timothy Brusseau , Pamela Kulinna , Catrine Tudor-Locke , Hans van der Mars , Paul Darst
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

There have been well-documented increases in overweight and obese children, sedentary lifestyles, and increased prevalence of a hypokinetic disease over the past 20 years. Thus understanding the physical activity patterns of children is essential for developing effective interventions. Little evidence exists that illustrates the contribution of weekend, physical education, and non-physical education days to overall physical activity patterns of children. The purpose of the study was to examine differences in pedometer-determined physical activity patterns of fourth and fifth grade children during weekend, physical education and non-physical education days. Three hundred and sixty-three children (8-11 years old) from six Southwestern USA elementary schools participated by wearing pedometers (Yamax Digiwalker SW-200) for seven consecutive days. Children recorded their steps at arrival to school and when they woke up and went to bed on weekend days. During weekdays, the fourth and fifth grade children averaged 13,196 ± 3,334 and 11,295 ± 3,168 steps/day for boys and girls, respectively. This is compared to a weekend average of 7,660 ± 4,647steps/day (boys) and 7,317 ± 4,062 steps/day (girls). Children were significantly more active on physical education days, averaging 12,979 steps/day (14,197 ± 4,697 steps/day for boys and 12,058 ± 3,772 steps/day for girls),compared to non-physical education school days, when they accumulated 11,809 steps/day (12,788 ± 3,600 steps/day for boys and 11,047 ± 3,382 steps/day for girls). Based on the findings in this study, children and youth are more active during school days than on weekend days. Furthermore, children are more active on physical education days than non-physical education days. These findings suggest that increased physical activity programming and interventions during weekend days may be needed to increase physical activity. The expansion of school-based physical education across more school days may also serve to increase children's physical activity during the school week.

Keywords

EN

Physical Activity; Pedometer; School Health; Youth

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Journal of Human Kinetics
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 27
• Pages: 123-134

Dates

published

1 - 3 - 2011

online

6 - 4 - 2011

Contributors

author

Timothy Brusseau

• College at Brockport, State University of New York

author

Pamela Kulinna

• Arizona State University

author

Catrine Tudor-Locke

• Pennington Biomedical Research Center

author

Hans van der Mars

• Arizona State University

author

Paul Darst

• Arizona State University

References

• Armstrong N, Welsman JR. The physical activity patterns of European youth with reference to methods of assessment. Sports Med, 2006; 36: 1067-1087.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Barfield JP, Rowe DA, Michael T. Interinstrument consistency of the Yamax Digi-Walker in elementary school children. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci, 2004; 8: 109-116.[Crossref]
• Beets MW, Bornstein D, Beighle A, Cardinal BJ, Morgan C. Pedometer-measured physical activity patterns of youth: A 13-country review. Am J Prev Med, 2010; 38: 208-216.[Crossref]
• Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I. A pilot study comparing pedometer counts with reported physical activity in elementary schoolchildren. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2004; 16: 355-367.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Growth Charts, 2000; Available:
• Cox M, Schofield G, Greasley N, Kolt G. Pedometer steps in primary school-aged children: A comparison of school-based and out-of-school activity. J Sci Med Sport, 2006; 9: 91-97.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Bassett DR. Spring-levered vs. piezo-electic pedometer accuracy in overweight and obese adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc, 2005; 37: 1673-1679.
• Duncan EK, Duncan JS, Schofield G. Pedometer-determined physical activity and active transport in girls. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2008; 5: 1-9.[WoS]
• Duncan JS, Schofield G, Duncan EK. Pedometer-determined physical activity and body composition in New Zealand children. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2006; 38: 1402-1409.[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
• Flohr JA, Todd MK, Tudor-Locke C. Pedometer-assessed physical activity in young adolescents. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2006; 77, 309-315.
• Food Research and Action Center. National School Lunch program. FRAC News Digest, 2008.
• Gavarry O, Giacomoni M, Bernard T, Seymat M, Falgairette G. Habitual physical activity in children and adolescents during school and free days. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2003; 35: 525-531.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Gordon-Larsen P, McMurray RG, Popkin BM. Determinants of adolescent physical activity and inactivity patterns. Pediatrics, 2000; 105:83-90.[Crossref]
• Groffik D, Fromel k, Pelclova J. Pedomters as a method for modification of physical activity in students. J Hum Kin, 2008; 20: 131-137.
• Graser SV, Groves A, Prusak KA, Pennington TR. Pedometer steps-per-minute, moderate intensity, and individual differences in 12-14 year-old youth. J Phys Act Health, 2011; 8: 272-278.[PubMed]
• McKee DP, Boreham CAG, Murphy MH, Nevill AM. Validation of the Digiwalker pedometer for measuring physical activity in young children. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 17: 345-352, 2005.
• Morgan CF, Pangrazi RP, Beighle A. Using pedometer to promote physical activity in physical education. JOPERD, 2003; 74:33-38.
• President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports. The Presidents Challenge Physical Activity and Fitness Awards Program. Bloomington, IN: Author, 2001.
• Raustorp A, Pangrazi RP, Stahle A. Physical activity level and body mass index among schoolchildren in southeastern Sweden. Acta Paediatri, 2004; 93: 400-404.
• Rowe DA, Mahar MT, Raedeke TD, Lore J. Measuring physical activity in children with pedometers: Reliability, reactivity, and replacement of missing data. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2004; 16: 343-354.
• Rowlands AV, Eston RG, Ingledew DK. Measurement of physical activity in children with particular reference to heart rate and pedometry. Sport Medicine, 1997; 24: 258-272.[Crossref]
• Sallis JF, Buono MJ, Roby JJ, Micale FG, Nelson JA. Seven-day recall and other physical activity self-reports in children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 1993; 25: 99-108.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2000; 32: 963-975.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Sirard JR, Pate RR. Physical activity assessment in children and adolescents. Sports Med, 2001; 31: 439-454.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: How many days of monitoring are needed? Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2000; 32: 426-431.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Tudor-Locke C, Lee SM, Morgan CF, Beighle A, Pangrazi RP. Children's pedometer-determined physical activity during the segmented school day. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 1732-1738.[WoS][Crossref]
• Tudor-Locke C, McClain JJ, Hart TL, Sisson SB, Washington TL. Expected values of pedometer-determined physical activity in youth. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2009; 80: 164-174.[WoS][Crossref]
• Tudor-Locke C, Pangrazi RP, Corbin CB, Rutherford WJ, Vincent SD, Raustorp A, et al. BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children. Prev Med, 2004; 38: 857-864.[Crossref]
• Tudor-Locke C, Williams JE, Reis JP, Pluto D. Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity. Sports Med, 2002; 32: 795-808.[Crossref]
• Vincent SD, Pangrazi RP. An examination of the activity patterns of elementary school children. Pediatr Exerc Sci, 2002; 14: 432-441.
• Vincent SD, Pangrazi RP, Raustorp A, Tomson LM, Cuddihy TF. Activity levels and body mass index of children in the United States, Sweden, and Australia. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2003; 35: 1367-1373.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Vincent SD, Sidman CL. Determining measurement error in digital pedometers. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci, 2003; 7:19-24.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10078-011-0010-4