Distribution of Practice Effects on Older and Younger Adults’ Motor-Skill Learning Ability

• Authors: Cláudio M.F. Leite , Herbert Ugrinowitsch , Maria Flávia S.P. Carvalho , Rodolfo N. Benda
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Purpose. In this study, we investigated the effects of the distribution of practice (distributed vs. massed) on the learning of a coincident timing task by young and older adults. Methods. Sixteen young adults and sixteen older adults were subdivided into distributed and massed practice groups. The participants completed a coincident timing task that consisted in touching five sensors in sequence under a time constraint in two learning phases: acquisition and transfer. Results. There were no performance differences between the groups in the acquisition phase. However, older adults in the massed practice group featured the poorest performance in the transfer test. No differences were found among the other groups. Conclusions. Older adults are more receptive to distribution practice as massed practice was found to lead to poorer learning. Comparisons of learning effectiveness between young and older adults are dependent on the adopted intra-session intervals. In addition, the conflicting results on distribution of practice may be related to subject-task interactions.

Keywords

EN

massed practice; distributed practice; spaced practice; motor learning; timing task

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Human Movement
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 20-26

Dates

published

1 - 03 - 2013

online

24 - 04 - 2013

Contributors

author

Cláudio M.F. Leite

• Federal University of São João del-Rei (UFSJ), São João del-Rei, Brazil, Av. Visconde do Rio Preto, Km 2, Colônia do Bengo, São João del-Rei, MG, Brasil CEP 36300-000

author

Herbert Ugrinowitsch

• Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil

author

Maria Flávia S.P. Carvalho

• Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil

author

Rodolfo N. Benda

• Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil

References

• 1. Carron A.V., Performance and learning in a discrete motor task under massed vs. distributed practice. Res Q,1969, 40 (3), 481-489.
• 2. Dail T.K., Christina R.W., Distribution of practice and metacognition in learning and long-term retention of a discrete motor task. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2004, 75 (2), 148-155.
• 3. Lee T.D., Genovese E.D., Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: learning and performance effects reconsidered. Res Q Exerc Sport, 1988, 59 (4), 277-287.
• 4. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D., Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics, Champaign 2011.
• 5. Donovan J.J., Radosevich D.J., A Meta-Analytic Review of the Distribution of Practice Effect: Now You See It, Now You Don’t. J Appl Psychol, 1999, 84 (5), 795-805.[Crossref]
• 6. Bock O., Thomas M., Grigorova V., The effects of rest breaks on human sensorimotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res, 2005, 163(2), 258-260, doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2231-z.[Crossref]
• 7. García J.A., Moreno F.J., Reina R., Menayo R., Fuentes J.P., Analysis of effects of distribution of practice in learning and retention of a continuous and a discrete skill presented on a computer. Percept Mot Skills, 2008, 107 (1), 261-272, doi: 10.2466/pms.107.1.261-272.[Crossref][WoS]
• 8. Lee T.D., Genovese, E.D., Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: different effects for discrete and continuous tasks. Res Q Exerc Sport,1989, 60(1), 59-65.
• 9. Stelmach G.E., Efficiency of motor learning as a function of inter-trial rest. Res Q, 1969, 40 (1), 198-202.
• 10. Christou E.A., Carlton L.G., Age and contraction type influence motor output variability in rapid discrete tasks. J Appl Physiol, 2002, 93 (2), 489-498, doi:10.1152/japplphysiol. 00335.2001.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 11. Jaworski J., Tchórzewski D., Bujas P., Involution of simple and complex reaction times among people aged between 21 and 80 - the results of computer tests. Hum Mov, 2011, 12 (2), 153-158, doi: 10.2478/v10038-011-0013-y.[Crossref]
• 12. Yordanova J., Kolev V., Hohnsbein J., Falkenstein M., Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentials. Brain, 2004, 127 (2), 351-362, doi: 10.1093/brain/awh042.[Crossref]
• 13. Peters A., Structural changes that occur during normal aging of primate cerebral hemispheres. Neurosci BiobehavRev, 2002, 26 (7), 733-741, doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(02) 00060-X.[Crossref]
• 14. Bock O., Schneider S., Sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderly humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2002, 26 (7), 761-767, doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00063-5.[Crossref]
• 15. Voelcker-Rehage C., Willimczik K., Motor plasticity in a juggling task in older adults - a developmental study. Age Ageing, 2006, 35 (4), 422-427, doi: 10.1093/ageing/ afl025.[Crossref]
• 16. Buch E.R., Young S., Contreas-Vidal J.L., Visuomotor adaptation in normal aging. Learn Mem, 2003, 10 (1), 55-63, doi:10.1101/lm.50303.[Crossref][PubMed]
• 17. Roller C.A., Cohen H.S., Kimball K.T., Bloomberg J.J., Effects of normal aging on visuo-motor plasticity. NeurobiolAging, 2002, 23, 117-123, doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00264-0.[Crossref]
• 18. Salmoni A.W., Schmidt R.A., Walter C.B., Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull, 1984, 95 (3), 355-386, doi: 10.1037/ 0033-2909.95.3.355[Crossref][PubMed]
• 19. Hillman C.H., Weiss E.P., Hagberg J.M., Hatfield B.D., The relationship of age and cardiovascular fitness to cognitive and motor process. Psychophysiology, 2002, 39 (3), 303-312, doi: 10.1017.S0048577201393058.
• 20. Ugrinowitsch H., Santos-Naves S.P., Carbinatto M.V., Benda R.N., Tani G., Motor skill adaptation depends on the level of learning. Inter J Hum Soc Sci, 2011, 6 (3), 177-181.
• 21. Fonseca F.S., Benda R.N., Profeta V.L.S., Ugrinowitsch H., Extensive practice improves adaptation to unpredictable perturbations in a sequential coincident timing task. Neurosci Lett, 2012, 517 (2), 123-127, doi: 10.1016/ j.neulet.2012.04.041.[WoS][Crossref]
• 22. Lourenço R.R., Veras R.P., Mini-Mental State Examination: psychometric characteristics in elderly outpatient [in Portuguese]. Revista Saúde Pública, 2006, 40 (4), 712-719, doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102006000500023.[Crossref]
• 23. Lintern G., Distributed practice: are there useful insights for application or theory? Res Q Exerc Sport, 1988, 59 (4), 298-302.
• 24. Schmidt R.A., Nacson J., Further tests of the activityset hypothesis for warm-up decrement. J Exp Psychol, 1971, 90 (1), 56-64, doi: 10.1037/h0031334.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 25. Wrisberg C.A., Anshel M.H., A field test of the activityset hypothesis for warm-up decrement in an open skill. Res Q Exerc Sport, 1993, 64 (1), 39-45.
• 26. Fernández-Ruiz J., Hall C., Vergara P., Díaz R., Prism adaptation in normal aging: slower adaptation rate and larger after effect. Cogn Brain Res, 2000, 9 (6), 223-226, doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00057-9.[Crossref]
• 27. Dempster F.N., Distributing and managing the conditions of encoding and practice. In: Bjork E.L., Bjork R.A. (eds.), Memory. Academic Press, New York 1996, 317-344.
• 28. Jacoby L.L., On interpreting the effects of repetition: solving a problem versus remembering a solution. J VerbLearn Verb Behav, 1978, 17, 649-667, doi: 10.1016/ S0022-5371(78)90393-6.[Crossref]
• 29. Cuddy L.J., Jacoby L.L., When forgetting helps memory: an analysis of repetition effects. J Verb Learn VerbBehav, 1982, 21, 451-467, doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(82) 90727-7.[Crossref]
• 30. Raz N., Rodrigue K.M., Differential aging of the brain: patterns, cognitive correlates and modifiers. NeurosciBiobehav Rev, 2006, 30 (6), 730-748,doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev. 2006.07.001.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10038-012-0050-1