Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2009 | 81 | 9 | 400-404

Article title

An Analysis of Enterovesical Fistulas in Patients Hospitalized in Medical University of the Infant Jesus Hospital in Warsaw from 1995 to 2006

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Enterovesical fistulas (EF) are a relatively uncommon complications of colorectal and pelvic malignancies, diverticulitis, inflammatory bowel disease, radiotherapy and traumas. Authors reviewed material of 24 patients hospitalized in the Jesus Infant Hospital Medical University of Warsaw from 1995 to 2006.Material and methods. A total of 24 symptomatic fistulas were recorded in a 13 of women and 11 of men. In all cases of persistent fistulas were treated by surgical and/or urological interventions. The origin of the fistulas were: colorectal malignancies 16 of patients (67%), pelvic malignancies 2 patients (8%), vesical malignancies 3 patients (12.5%) and other 3 patients (12.5%). The most common anatomical anastomoses were as follows: vesicosigmoidal fistula in 12 patients (50%), vesicorectal fistula in 4 patients (16.5%), vesicoenteral fistula in 2 patients (8.5%), urogenitoenteral fistula in 3 patients (12.5%), other in 3 patients (12.5%).Results. Surgical treatment of fistulas were: colostomy in 15 patients (50%), enteral resections and anastomoses in 6 patients (20%), transversostomy 3 patients (10%), jejunostomy 1 patient (3%), other in 5 patients (17%). To the end of 2006 from 24 patients underwent of treatment : 9 patients are alive (37.5%), 8 patients death (33.3%), 7 unknown (29.2%). The median period of life were 12 months (from 1 to 84 months) after.Conclusions. 1. The most common etiological factors of enterovesical fistulas were colorectal malignancies 67% of patients. 2. Only 20% of patients were underwent completly surgical treatment because of advenced malignancies. 3. The most common method of surgical treatment was colostomy in 63% of patients.

Year

Volume

81

Issue

9

Pages

400-404

Physical description

Dates

published
1 - 9 - 2009
online
4 - 9 - 2009

Contributors

  • Department of General Urology, Oncology and Functional, Warsaw Medical University
  • Department of General Urology, Oncology and Functional, Warsaw Medical University
author
  • Department of General Urology, Oncology and Functional, Warsaw Medical University
  • Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Warsaw Medical University
  • Department of Surgical Nursing and Transplantation, Warsaw Medical University
  • Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Warsaw Medical University
  • Department of General Urology, Oncology and Functional, Warsaw Medical University

References

  • ---
  • Kavanagh D, Neary P, Dodd JD et al.: Diagnosis and treatment of enterovesical fistulae. Colorectal Dis 2005; 7(3): 286-91.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Najjar SF, Jamal MK, Savas JF et al.: The spectrum of colovesical fistula and diagnostic paradigm. Am J Surg 2004; 188: 617-21.
  • Sarr MG, Fishman EK, Goldman SM et al.: Enterovesical fistula. Surg Gyn Obst 1887; 164(1): 41-48.
  • Woods RJ, Lavery IC, Fazio VW et al:. Internal fistulas in diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31: 591-96.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Hnicak H: Postoperative and postradiation changes in the pelvis. Magn Reson Q 1990; 6: 276.[WoS]
  • Onuora VC, Al-Mohalhal S, Youssef AM et al.: Iatrogenic urogenital fistulae. Br J Urol 1993; 71: 176-78.[WoS]
  • Gruner JS, Sehon JK, Johnson LW: Diagnosis and management of enterovesical fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease. Am Surg 2002; 68: 714-19.
  • Goldman SM, Fishman EK, Gatewood MB et al.: CT in the diagnosis of enterovesical fistulae. AJR 1985;144: i229-i233.
  • Larsen A, Bjerklund Johansen TE, Solheim BM et al.: Diagnosis and treatment of enterovesical fistula. Eur Urol 1996; 29(3): 284-88.
  • Ravichandran S, Matanhelia S, Dobson M: MRI in colovesical fistula. Eur Urol 2006; Suppl. 5; 2; p. 143.[Crossref]
  • Dawam D, Patel S, Kouriefs C et al.: A "urological" enterovesical fistula. J Urol 2004; 172(3): 943-44.
  • Wolnik Z, Lorencewicz Z, Borowka A: Przetoka przecherzowo-esicza jako powikłanie uchyłkowatości jelita grubego. (in polish) Urologia Pol 1980; 33/4;.
  • Jozwik M, Jozwik M, Lotocki W: Vesicouterine fistula - an analysis of 24 cases from Poland. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 57: 169-72.
  • Jozwik M, Jozwik M: Clinical classification of vesicouterine fistula. Int J Ginecol Obstet 2000; 70; 353-57.
  • Kuzaka B, Wierzbicki Z, Madej G et al.: Przetoka esiczo- pecherzowa w nastepstwie raka esicy. (in polish) Pol Merkuriusz Lek 1996; 1(3): 195-97.
  • Liu CH, Chuang CK, Chu SH et al.: Enterovesical fistula: experiences with 41 cases in 12 years. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi (Chin) 1999; 22: 598-603.
  • Moss RL, Ryan JA Jr: Management of enterovesical fistulas. Am J Surg 1990; 159(5): 514-17.
  • McNamara MJ, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al. Surgical treatment of enterovesical fistulas In Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33(4) 271-76.[PubMed][Crossref]
  • Ikeuchi H, Shoji Y, Yamamura T: Management of fistulas in Crohn's disease. Dig Surg 2002; 19: 36-39.
  • Ben-Ami H, Ginesin Y, Behar DM et al.: Diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract complications in Crohn's disease: an experience of over 15 years. Can J Gastroenterol 2002; 16: 225-29.
  • Schwartz DA, Loftus EV Jr, Tremaine WJ et al.: The natural history of fistulizing Crohn's disease in Olmsted County, Minessota. Gastroenterology 2002; 122; 875-80.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_2478_v10035-009-0067-0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.