Using fractal dimension to evaluate alveolar bone defects treated with various bone substitute materials

• Authors: Marcin Kozakiewicz , Sławomir Chaberek , Katarzyna Bogusiak
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Keywords

EN

Biocompatible Materials; Bone Resorption; Bone Substitutes; Fractal analysis; Image Processing; Mandible; Maxillary Sinus; Subtraction Technique

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Open Medicine
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 6
• Pages: 776-789

Dates

published

1 - 12 - 2013

online

6 - 12 - 2013

Contributors

author

Marcin Kozakiewicz

• Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, ul. Zeromskiego 113, 90-549, Lodz, Poland

author

Sławomir Chaberek

• Independent Clinical Hospital, ul. Konarskiego 13, 05-400, Otwock, Poland

author

Katarzyna Bogusiak

• Department of Craniomaxillofacial and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, ul. Kopcińskiego 22, 90-153, Lodz, Poland

References

• [1] Shrout MK, Potter BJ, Hildebolt CF. The effect of image variation on fractal dimension calculations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84: 96–100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90303-6[Crossref]
• [2] Tatum H. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Den Clin North Am 1986; 30: 207–229
• [3] Pappalardo S, Puzzo S, Carlino V, Cappello V. Bone substitutes in oral surgery. Minerva Stomatol 2007; 56: 541–557
• [4] Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38: 613–616
• [5] Wood RM, Moore DL. Grafting of the maxillary sinus with intraorally harvested autogenous bone prior to implant placement. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants 1988; 3: 209–214
• [6] Harris WH, White RE, McCarthy JC, Walker PS, Weinberg EH. Bony ingrowth fixation of acetabular component in canine hip joint arthroplastry. Clin Orthop Retal Res 1983; 176: 7–11
• [7] Hulbert SF, Young FA, Mathews RS, Klawitter JJ, Talbert CD, Stelling FH. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1970; 4: 433–456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820040309[Crossref]
• [8] Kozakiewicz M, Hanclik M, Arkuszewski P, et al. Bone augumentation with Bio-OSS. 18 month assessment utilizing radiological subtraction. Zeitschrift Zahnarztlich Implantologie 2001, suppl, S14
• [9] Holinger J O, Brekke J, Gruskin E, Lee D. Role of bone substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 324: 55–65 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199603000-00008[Crossref]
• [10] Taylor JC, Cuff SE, Leger JP, Morra A, Anderson GI. In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augumentation: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 321–330
• [11] Wheeler DL, Stokes KE, Hoelrich RG, Chamberland DL, McLoughlin SW. Effect of bioactive glass participle size on osseous regeneration of cancellous defects. J Biomed Mater Res 1998; 41: 527–533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980915)41:4<527::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-E[Crossref]
• [12] Lovelace TB, Mellonig JT, Meffert RM, Jones AA, Nummikoski PV, Cochran DL. Clinical evaluation of bioactive glass in the treatment of periodontal osseus defects in humans. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 1027–1035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.9.1027[Crossref]
• [13] Zins JE, Whitaker LA. Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 778–785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198312000-00005[Crossref]
• [14] Sailer HF, Weber FE. Bone substitutes. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2000; 4: 384–391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00014562[Crossref]
• [15] Moy PK, Lundgren S, Holmes RE. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 857–862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80103-X[Crossref]
• [16] Tadjoedin ES, de Lange GL, Holzmann PJ, Kulper L, Burger EH. Histological observations on biopsies harvested following sinus floor elevation using a bioactive glass material of narrow size range. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 334–344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011004334.x[Crossref]
• [17] Aygit AC, Sarikaya A, Candan L, Ayhan MS, Cermik TF. Comparison of alloplastic implants for facial bones by scintigraphy and histology: an experimental study. Eur J Plast Surg 1999; 22: 102–106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002380050158[Crossref]
• [18] Hanisch O, Lozada JL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ, Kan JY, Spiekermann H. Maxillary sinus augmentation prior to placement of endosseous implants: a histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 329–336.
• [19] Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 217–229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003217.x[Crossref]
• [20] Jensen T, Schou S, Svendsen PA, Forman JL, Gundersen HJ, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P: Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23(8): 902–910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02245.x[Crossref]
• [21] Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft in animals: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 114–120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.08.010[Crossref]
• [22] McAllister BS, Margolin MD, Cogan AG, Buck D, Hollinger JO, Lynch SE. Eighteen-month radiographic and histologic evaluation of sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone in the chimpanzee. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 361–368.
• [23] Liu YL, Schoenaers J, De Groot K, de Wijn JR, Schepers E. Bone healing in porous implants: a histological and histometrical comparative study on sheep. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000; 11: 711–717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008971611885[Crossref]
• [24] Haas R, Baron M, Donath K, Zechner W, Watzek G. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 337–346
• [25] Suba Z, Takács D, Gyulai-Gaál Sz, Kovács K. Facilitation of beta-tricalcium phosphate-induced alveolar bone regeneration by platelet-rich plasma in beagle dogs. A histologic and histomorphometric study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 832–838
• [26] Almasri M, Altalibi M. Efficacy of reconstruction of alveolar bone using an alloplastic hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate graft under biodegradable chambers. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 49: 469–473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2010.06.021[Crossref]
• [27] Anselme K, Noel B, Flautre B, Blary MC, Delecourt C, Descamps M. Association of porous hydroxyapatite and bone marrow cells for bone regeneration. Bone 1999; 25: 51–54 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00133-7[Crossref]
• [28] Laurencin CT, Attawia MA, Elgendy HE, Herbert KM. Tissue engineered bone regeneration using degradable polymers: the formation of mineralized matrices. Bone 1996; 19: 93–99 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00132-9[Crossref]
• [29] Bassil J, Naaman N, Lattouf R, Kassis C, Changotade S, Baroukh B, Senni K, Godeau G: Clinical, histological, and histomorphometrical analysis of maxillary sinus augmentation using inorganic bovine in humans: preliminary results. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39(1): 73–80 http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00012[Crossref]
• [30] Isenberg G, Goldman HM, Spira J, Parsons FG, Street PN. Radiography analysis by two-dimensional microdensitometry. J Am Dent Assoc 1968; 77: 1069–1073 [Crossref]
• [31] Ort MG, Gregg EC, Kaufman B. Subtraction radiography: techniques and limitations. Radiology 1977; 124: 65–72 [Crossref]
• [32] Ruttimann UE, Ship JA. The use of fractal geometry to quantitate bone structure from radiographs. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 287 (Abstr 1431)
• [33] Yasar F, Akgunlu F. The differences in panoramic mandibular indices and fractal dimension between patients with and without spinal osteoporosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 1–9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/97652136[Crossref]
• [34] Chen J, Zheng B, Chang YH, Shaw CC, Towers JD, Gur D. Fractal analysis of trabecular patterns in projection radiographs. An assessment. Invest Radiol 1994; 29: 624–629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199406000-00005[Crossref]
• [35] Ruttimann UE, Webber RL, Hazelrig JB. Fractal dimension from radiographs of peridental alveolar bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 98–110 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90222-C[Crossref]
• [36] Law AN, Bollen AM, Chen SK. Detecting osteoporosis using dental radiographs: a comparison of four methods. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 1734–1742 [Crossref]
• [37] Samarabandu J, Acharya R, Hausmann E, Allen K. Analysis of bone X-rays using morphological fractals. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1993; 12: 466–470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/42.241873[Crossref]
• [38] Geraets WGM, van der Stelt PF. Fractal properties of bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 144–153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600524[Crossref]
• [39] Webber RL, Hazelrig JB, Patel JR, Van den Berg HR, Lemons. JE. Evaluation of site-specific differences in trabecular bone using fractal geometry. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 528 (Abstr 2095)
• [40] Shrout MK, Potter BJ, Hildebolt CF. The effect of image variations on fractal dimension calculations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84: 96–100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90303-6[Crossref]
• [41] Jolley L, Majumdar S, Kapila S. Technical factors in fractal analysis of periapical radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 393–397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30969642[Crossref]
• [42] Shrout MK, Roberson B, Potter BJ, Mailhot JM, Hildebolt CF. A comparison of 2 patient populations using fractal analysis. J Periodontal 1998; 69: 9–13 http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.1998.69.1.9[Crossref]
• [43] Wilding RJ, Slabbert JC, Kathree H, Owen CP, Crombie K, Delport P. The use of fractal analysis to reveal remodelling in human alveolar bone following the placement of dental implants. Arch Oral Biol 1995; 40: 61–72 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)00138-2[Crossref]
• [44] Veenland JF, Grashius JL, van der Meer F, Beckers AL, Gelsema ES. Estimation of fractal dimension in radiographs. Med Phys 1996; 23:585–594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.597816[Crossref]
• [45] Caligiuri P, Giger ML, Favus M. Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis. Med Phis 1994; 21: 503–508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.597390[Crossref]
• [46] Cargill EB, Barrett HH, Fiete RD, Ker M, Patton D, Sweeley GW. Fractal physiology and nuclear medicine scans. SPIE Conference on Medical Imaging II 1988; 355–362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.968652[Crossref]
• [47] Kozakiewicz M, Bogusiak K, Hanclik M, Denkowski M, Arkuszewski P. Noise In subtraction images made from pairs of intraoral radiographs: a comparison between four methods of geometric alignment. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37:40–46 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/22185098[Crossref]
• [48] Chan KL. Quantitative characterization of electron micrograph image using fractal feature. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1995; 42: 1033–1037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/10.464378[Crossref]
• [49] Wojtowicz A, Chaberek S, Urbanowska E, Ostrowski K. Comparison of efficiency of platelet rich plasma, hematopoieic stem cells and bone marrow in augmentation of mandibular bone defects. N Y State Dent J 2007; 73: 41–45
• [50] Berry JL, Towers JD, Webber RL, Pope TL, Davidai G, Zimmerman M. Change in trabecular architectures measured by fractal dimension. J Biomech 1996; 29: 819–822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(95)00113-1[Crossref]
• [51] Le Corroller T, Halgrin J, Pithioux M, Guenoun D, Chabrand P, Champsaur P. Combination of texture analysis and bone mineral density improves the prediction of fracture load in human femurs. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23: 163–169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1703-1[Crossref]
• [52] Veltri M, Ferrari M, Balleri P. Correlation of radiographic fractal analysis with implant insertion torque in a rabbit trabecular bone model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 108–114
• [53] Koyama A, Kumasaka S, Kashima I. Relationship between bone mineral density and 2D and 3D structural parameters of bone trabeculae. Oral Radiology 2005; 21: 62–68 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11282-005-0033-4[Crossref]
• [54] Meagher PJ, Morrison WA. Free fibula flap-donorsite morbidity: case report and review of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002; 18: 465–468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-33327[Crossref]
• [55] Tsuji RK, Jorgetti V, Bento RF, Brito Neto RV. Use of Alpha-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Cement in the Surgical Treatment of Mastoid Cavity. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2008; 12: 397–405
• [56] Sang H, Wang Z, Guo Z, Wang L, Li J, Meng G, et al. Clinical results and the mechanism of bone healing for the repair of bone defects due to tumor resection with novel interporous TCP. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2008; 22: 463–467 (Abstract)
• [57] Marx RE. Bone and bone graft healing. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2007; 19: 455–466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2007.07.008[Crossref]
• [58] Mamun S, Akhter M, Molla MR. Bone Grafts in Jaw Cysts-Hydroxyapatite & Allogenic Bone - A Comparative Study. BSMMU J 2009; 2: 34–39
• [59] Zaffe D, Leghissa GC, Pradelli J, Botticelli AR. Histological study on sinus lift grafting by Fisiograft and Bio-Oss. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005; 16: 789–793 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-3574-5[Crossref]
• [60] De Boever AL, De Boever JA. Guided bone regeneration around non-submerged implants in narrow alveolar ridges: a prospective long-term clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 549–556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01154.x[Crossref]
• [61] Wiltfang J, Schlegel KA, Schultze-Mosgau S, Nkenke E. Sinus floor augmentation with beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP): does platelet-rich plasma promote its osseous integration and degradation? Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 213–218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140212.x[Crossref]
• [62] Tamimi FM, Torres J, Tresguerres I, Clemente C, López-Cabarcos E, Blanco LJ. Bone augmentation in rabbit calvariae: comparative study between Bio-Oss and a novel β-TCP/DCPD granulate. J Clin Periodontol 2006; 33: 922–928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01004.x[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/s11536-013-0197-y