Zakresy rotacji tułowia i miednicy u dziewcząt ze skoliozą idiopatyczną / A range of rotation of the trunk and pelvis in girls with idiopathic scoliosis

• Authors: Agnieszka Stępień
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Introduction: Mobility of spine in persons with different types of idiopathic scoliosis hasn’t been estimate. The aim of this study was to state the influence of scoliosis on a range of rotation of trunk and pelvis in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Methods: 59 AIS girls at the age of 10-18 participated in the study. Right thoracic curve or left lumbar curve at spine radiography were the criteria for further measurements. Four groups including girls with different types of scoliosis were formed. Measurements were made in upright standing position The special designed prototype axial rotation tester with flip computer system was used to assess the range of rotation. The shoulder girdle with upper p of the trunk or the pelvis were fixed during tested rotation motions. The number and order motions were precisely determined in the study. 30 healthy girls without scoliosis were test as the control group. ANOVA test and T-test were used for statistical analyzes.Results: There are significant differences between the girls with double curve scoliosis with dominant right thoracic curve, the girls with single or double curve scoliosis with dominant left lumbar curve and the control group. Limited rotation of trunk and pelvis in horizontal plane were observed in the girls with double curve scoliosis with the dominant right thoracic curve. Increased rotation of pelvis in girls with single or double curve scoliosis with dominant left lumbar curve was found.Conclusions: A range of rotation of trunk and pelvis in girls with idiopathic scoliosis depends on a type of scoliosis, especially on location of dominant curve of scoliosis. A dominant right thoracic curve causes limitation of a range of rotation of trunk or pelvis and provokes asymmetries between a range of left and right rotation.A dominant left lumbar curve is conductive to increase a range of rotation of pelvis and provokes asymmetries between a range of left and right rotation.

Keywords

EN

skolioza idiopatyczna; rotacja; idiopathic scoliosis; rotation

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Advances in Rehabilitation
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 25
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 5-12

Dates

published

1 - 09 - 2011

online

27 - 08 - 2013

Contributors

author

Agnieszka Stępień

• Wydział Rehabilitacji, Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Warszawie */ Grant Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego Pb2

References

• 1. Stokes IAF. Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity: A report presented to the Scoliosis Research So- ciety Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformi- ty. Spine; 19: 236-248.
• 2. Nault ML, Allard P, Hinse S et al. Relations between standing stability and body posture parameters in scoliosis. Spine 2002; 27(17); 1911-1917.[Crossref][PubMed]
• 3. Gauchard G, Lascombes P, Kuhnast M et al. Influence of different types of progressive idiopathic scoliosis on static and dynamic postural control. Spine 2001 ;26(9): 1052-1058.[Crossref][PubMed]
• 4. Stokes IAF, Gardner-Morse M. Muscle activation strategies and symmetry of spinal loading in the lumbar spine with scoliosis. Spine 2004; 29(19): 2103-2107.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 5. Erkula G, Kiter AE, Kilic BAet al. The relation of joint la- xity and trunk rotation. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005; 14(1): 38-41.[Crossref]
• 6. Karski T: Biomechanical explanation of etiology of so-called idiopathic scoliosis. Two etiological groups - important for treatment and neoprophylaxis. Pan Arab J Orthop & Trauma 2005; 9: 123-135.
• 7. Karski T: Recent observations in the biomechanical etiology of so-called idiopathic scoliosis. New classification of spinal deformity-I-st, Il-nd and III-rd etiopathological groups. Stud Health Techno Inform 2006; 123: 473-482.
• 8. Kotwicki T: Badanie zakresu ruchu w stawach biodro- wych - modyfikacja badania i wyniki pacjentów ze skoliozą. Ann AcadMed Siles 2007; 61(1): 1-4.
• 9. Chwała W, M’hango A, Białek M et al. Wpływ terapii na różnice biopotencjałów czynnościowych mięśni grzbietu u dzieci z idiopatyczną skoliozą dwułukową. Fizjoterapia Polska 2005; 5(2): 149-156.
• 10. Cheung J, Veldhuizen AG, Halberts JP et al. Geometrie and electromyographic assessment in the evaluation of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006, 31(3): 322-329.[Crossref]
• 11. Zabijek KF, Leroux MA, Coillard C et al. Evaluation of segmental postural characteristics during quiet standing in control and idiopathic scolisis patients. Clin Biomach 2005; 20(5): 483-490.[Crossref]
• 12. Ostrowska B, Rożek-Piechura K, Skolimowski T. Od- zyskiwanie dynamicznej równowagi po zewnętrznych zaburzeniach postawy u dzieci ze skoliozą idiopatyczną. Ortopedia, Traumatológia, Rehabilitacja 2006; 8(3): 300-307.
• 13. Mallau S, Bollini G, Jouve JL et al. Locomotor skills and balance strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2007; 32(1): 14-22.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 14. Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V, Dangerfield PH et al. Comparison of gait patterns between healthy and scoliotic patients using time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces. Spine 1996, 21(19): 2235-2242.[Crossref][PubMed]
• 15. Hopf C, Scheidecker M, Steffan K et al. Gait analysis in idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery: a comparison of the pre- and postoperative muscle activation pattern. Eur Spine J 1998; 7(1):6-11.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 16. Chockalingam N, Dangerfield PH, Rahmatalla A et al. Assessment of ground reaction force during scoliotic gait. Eur Spine J 2004; 13(8): 750-754.[Crossref][PubMed]
• 17. Kramers-de Quervain IA, Muller R, Stacoff A et al. Gait analysis in patient with idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2004; Aug; 13(5): 449-456.[PubMed]
• 18. Syczewska M, Łukaszewska A, Górak B et al. Zmiany stereotypu chodu u pacjentów z bocznym skrzywieniem krę- gosłupa. Rehabilitacja Medyczna 2006; 10(4): 12-21.
• 19. Stępień A. Seyfried A, Krawczyk M et al. Wpływ deformacji kręgosłupa na sposób obciążania stóp w czasie chodu u osób ze skoliozą idiopatyczną. Postępy Rehabilitacji 2007; 2: 13-20.
• 20. Kapandji IA. Pliysiologie aiticulaire. Maloine SA. Editeur. 1982.
• 21. Kaltenbom FM. Kręgosłup - badanie manualne i mobilizacja. Tonni. Wydawnictwo Rolewski. 1998.
• 22. Wilk B. Karol SA. Johnson CE et al. The effect of scoliosis fusion on spinal motion: a comparison of fused and nonfused patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006. 31(3): 309-314.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 23. Hresko MT. Mesiha M. Richards K et al. A comparison of methods for measuring spinal motion in female pa- tients with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2006: 26(6): 758-763.[Crossref]
• 24. Engsberg JR. Lenke LG. Reitenbach AK: Prospective evaluation of trunk range of motion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Spine 2002:27:1346-54.[Crossref][PubMed]
• 25. Nakakohji: Sagittal spinal flexibility in patients with i|diopathic scoliosis. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1994: 68(12): 1033-1043.
• 26. Deviren V. Berven S. Kleinsmeck F et al. Predictors of flexibility and pain patterns in thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002: 27(21): 2346-2349.[PubMed][Crossref]
• 27. Grivas TB. Vasiliadis ES.. Koufopoulos G. Smdy of trunk asymmetry in normal children and adolescent. Scoliosis 2006: 1:19.
• 28. Poussa M. Mellin G. 1992: Spinal mobility and posm- re in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at tlnee stages of curve magnitude. Spine: Jul: 17(7): 757-760.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/rehab-2013-0009