Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University. Krakow Poland
References
Abrams S., Polygraph validity and reliability: a review, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1973, 18, 4, pp. 313-326.
Cieślak M., zagadnienia dowodowe w procesie karnym, t. I Wyd. Prawnicze, Warszawa 1955, p. 82 and ff .
Gaberle A., Dowody w sądowym procesie karnym, Ofi cyna a Wolters Kluwer business, Krakow 2007, p. 44 and ff .
Inman K., Rudin N., Principles and practice of criminalistics. Th e profession of forensic science, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C., 2001, pp. 101-102. 110, 158.
Ingram J.L., Criminal evidence, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo 2012, pp. 98-104. Innovations in evidence and proof. Integrating theory, research and teaching, P. Roberts, M. Redmayne (eds.), Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, 2009, pp. 219 and ff .
Kiely T. F., Forensic evidence: science and the criminal law, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington D.C. 2001, pp. 38-39, 169, 173, 277.
Nelken J., Dowod poszlakowy w procesie karnym, Wydawnictwo Prawnicze, Warszawa 1970, pp. 89 and ff . Report APA, Polygraph, special issue, 2011.
Widacki J., Wartość diagnostyczna badania poligrafi cznego i jej znaczenie kryminalistyczne, Wyd. UJ, Krakow 1977.
Widacki J., Horvath F., An experimental investigation of the relative validity and utility of the polygraph technique and three other common methods of criminal identification, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 1978, 23,3, pp. 596-601.
Ziembiński Z. Logika praktyczna , PWN Warszawa 1984, pp. 170-173.