Observations from the Analysis of Searching Peak of Tension Test (SPOT) Charts

• Authors: Ryszard Jaworski
• Languages of publication: EN

Keywords

EN

Peak of Tension Test (POT); Searching Peak of Tension (SPOT)

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: European Polygraph
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 25-52

Dates

published

1 - 3 - 2015

online

5 - 5 - 2015

Contributors

author

Ryszard Jaworski

• University of Wrocław Wrocław Poland

References

• (1) Abrams S. (1989), Th e complete polygraph handbook, Lexington, Lexington Books.
• (2) Ansley N. (1992), Th e History and Accuracy of Guilty Knowledge and Peak of Tension Tests, Polygraph, Vol. 21, No. 3.
• (3) Ansley N. (1998), Question formulation, Polygraph, Vol. 27, No. 3.
• (4) Backster C. (1969), Standardized polygraph examination notepack, San Diego, Backster Associates.
• (5) Dufek M., Widacki J., Valkowa V. (1975), Eksperymentalne badania przydatności poligrafu do przeszukania pomieszczeń, Archiwum Medycyny Sadowej i Kryminologii, Vol. 25, No. 2.
• (6) Federal Psychophysiological Detection of Deception Examiner Handbook (2011), Polygraph, Vol. 40, No 1. Special Edition.
• (7) Harrelson L. (1964), Th e Polygraph. Interrogation, Chicago.
• (8) Hikita Y., Suzuki A. (1965), Construction and Interviewing of Probing Peak of Tension Tests for Some Other Crime Suspected and Their Results. Research Materials, No. 35. Polygraph Reports, National Research Institute of Police Science.
• (9) Hikita Y. (1969), Results of Probing Peak of Tension Tests Used in Other Crimes and Its Relation to the Suspected Conditions, Research Materials, No. 53, Polygraph Reports, National Research Institute of Police Science.
• (10) Jaworski R. (2001), Application of Situational Sequencing Test in the Case of Police Officers Suspected of Murder and POT Tests as ‘Knowledge of the Perpetrator Test’, Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 51, No. 2.
• (11) Jaworski R. (2003), Th e Significance of Situational Sequencing Tests in Establishing the Participation of Two Persons in a Murder Case and Hiding the Corpse, Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 53, No. 2.
• (12) Jaworski R. (2006), Further Investigation Supports the Accuracy of Polygraph Examinations, Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 56, No. 5.
• (13) Jaworski R. (2008), Multi-subject polygraph examination, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego [Wrocław University Press], Wrocław.
• (14) Jaworski R. (2008), Th e validity of Polygraph Examination of an Innocent Person and a Perpetrator Administered Several Years after a Murder, European Polygraph, Vol. 1, No. 3.
• (15) Jaworski R. (2011), Personalization and Calibration of the Control Question in the Control Question Test, Journal of Forensic Identification, Vol. 61, No. 5.
• (16) Johnston A. (1958), Th e magic lie detector, Saturday Evening Post, April 1944; quoted from: Academy Lectures on Lie-Detection, Vol. 2, Springfield [about Leonard Keeler].
• (17) Lykken D. (1981), A tremor in the blood, Perseus Books, New York.
• (18) Matte J.A. (1996), Forensic Psychophysiology. Using the Polygraph. Scientific Truth Verification - Lie Detection. J.A.M. Publications, Williamsville, New York.
• (19) Nakayama M. (2002), Practical Use of the Concealed Information Test for Criminal Investigation in Japan [in:] M. Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing, Academic Press, London.
• (20) National Research Council (2003), Th e Polygraph and Lie Detection, Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington DC, Th e National Academies Press.
• (21) Ohkawa H. (1963), Comparison of Physiological Response of ‘Yes’, ‘No’, and ‘Mute’ Conditions In Peak of Tension Test. Reports of the National Institute of Police Science, Japan, No. 1-4.
• (22) Ohmishi K., Matsuno K., Arasuna M., Suzuki A. (1976), Th e objective Analysis of Physiological Indices in the Field Detection of Deception, Reports of the National Institute of Police Science, Vol. 29, No. 3.
• (23) Reid J., Inbau F.E. (1977), Truth and Deception: Th e Polygraph (‘Lie Detector’) Technique, Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins.
• (24) Saldziunas V., Kovalenko A. (2008), Th e Event Knowledge Test (EKT) in Polygraph Examination (in case murder), European Polygraph, Vol. 2, No. 2 (4).
• (25) Saldziunas V., Kovalenko A. (2008), The Event Knowledge Test (EKT) In Polygraph Examination, European Polygraph, Vol. 2, No. 3-4 (5-6).
• (26) Saldziunas V., Kovalenko A. (2011), A Little About Memory Traces, European Polygraph, Vol. 5, No. 1 (15).
• (27) Saldziunas V., Kovalenko A., Knyazev V. (2012), Tests with Numbers, European Polygraph, Vol. 6, No. 1 (19).
• (28) Widacki J. (1981), Wprowadzenie do problematyki badań poligraficznych, Warszawa.
• (29) Wilkerson O.M. (1978), Th e Peak of Tension Tests Utilized in the Ashmore Kidnapping, Polygraph, Vol. 7, No. 1.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/ep-2015-0002