How "fast" reading of prenatal cardiac diagnosis may badly influence the neonatal management - case report from tertiary center in 2015 and literature review

• Authors: Katarzyna Piątek , Katarzyna Zych-Krekora , Joanna Płużańska , Ewa Gulczyńska , Maria Respondek-Liberska
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Complains about prenatal diagnoses usually touch late diagnosis, missed diagnosis or uncomplete diagnosis. Prenatal diagnose provides usually important information for parents, obstetrician and neonatologist. Successful perinatal care is based on a good cooperation of the perinatal team. This time we present a peculiar situation when improper reading of prenatal diagnosis had caused a lot of troubles for the patient, parents and hospital staff.

Keywords

EN

prenatal diagnoses; misinterpretation; l-TGA; d-TGA

• Publisher: De Gruyter Open
• Journal: Prenatal Cardiology
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 38-41

Dates

published

1 - 9 - 2015

received

21 - 9 - 0015

accepted

27 - 9 - 2015

online

30 - 12 - 2015

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Piątek

• Student Science Club "Prenatal Cardiology"

author

Katarzyna Zych-Krekora

• Department of Prenatal Cardiology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute

author

Joanna Płużańska

• Department of Prenatal Cardiology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute

author

Ewa Gulczyńska

• Neonatology Clinic, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute

author

Maria Respondek-Liberska

• Department of Diagnoses and Prevention Fetal Malformations Medical University of Lodz
• Department of Prenatal Cardiology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute

References

• 1. Park JK, DK Taylor, M Skeels, DR Towner. 1997. “Dilated coronary sinus in the fetus: misinterpretation as an atrioventricular canal defect”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10 (2): 126-129[Crossref]
• 2. Pilu G, L De Palma, R Romero, L Bovicelli, JC Hobbins. 1986. “The fetal subarachnoid cisterns: an ultrasound study with report of a case of congenital communicating hydrocephalus”. J Ultrasound Med 5 (7):365-372
• 3. Onumba, OC Dilly. 2013. “Errors in prenatal diagnosis”, Best Practice & Research ,Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 27 (4):537-548
• 4. Ahn H, E Hernández-Andrade, R Romero, M Ptwardhan, LF Goncalves, A Aurioles-Garibay, M Garcia , SS Hassan, L Yeo. 2013. “Mirror artifacts in obstetric ultrasound: case presentation of a ghost twin during the second-trimester ultrasound scan”. Fetal Diagn Ther. 34(4):248-252. doi:10.1159/000353702.[WoS][Crossref]
• 5. Altug N, AN Danisman. 2013. “Echogenic focus in the fetal left ventricular cavity: is it a false tendon?”. Early Hum Dev. 89 (7):479-482. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.03.012.[WoS][Crossref]
• 6. Garnier S, O Maillet, S Haouy, M Saguintaah, I Serre, RB Galifer, D Forgues, MP Guibal, H Allal, E Sabatier, N Kalfa. 2012. “Prenatal intrarenal neuroblastoma mimicking a mesoblastic nephroma: a case report”. J Pediatr Surg. 47 (8):21-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.090.[WoS][Crossref]
• 7. Paladini D, P Volpe, M Marasini, MG Russo, M Vassallo, M Gentile, R Calabro. 2006. “Diagnosis, characterization and outcome of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in the fetus: a multicenter series of 30 cases”. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:281-285[Crossref]
• 8. Sabatowska M, M Soroka, M Słodki. 2015. “Prenatal diagnosis of congenitally corrected transposition of great arteries on the basis of four heart chambers’ image - case report. Prenat Cardio. 5 (1): 26-28
• 9. Kornacka M, M Respondek-Liberska. 2013. “The place for neonatologist in proper perinatal care”. Prenat Cardio. 3 (3): 12-15
• 10. Blitek M, K Janiak, M Słodki, K Szaflik, A Piaseczna-Piotrowska, I Maroszyńska, M Respondek-Liberska. 2012. [Echocardiographic monitoring of an invasive fetal therapy CCAM type II - case report]. Prenat Cardio. 2 (5): 37-41. [Polish]

Identifiers

DOI

10.12847/09158