Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results

Results found: 1

Number of results on page
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  cancer-associated thromboembolism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
|
|
vol. 8
|
issue 3
70-75
EN
Cancer disease is one of the most significant risk factors for venous thromboembolic complications. In this review features of treatment and unsolved questions of alternative anticoagulant therapy of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT) are considered. The modern guidelines advocate the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) over a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for the first 3–6 months after diagnosis of VTE in cancer patients. Few years ago direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). DOACs have demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety with VKA in general population. But efficacy and safety of DOACs as compared with long-term LMWH for the treatment of CAT have not been definitely established. The review focuses on the results of the first two prospective randomized studies (HOKUSAI VTE Cancer and SELECT-D) in which the efficacy and safety of edoxaban and rivaroxaban was compared with low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin for the treatment of VTE in cancer patients and the latest recommendations from SSC of the ISTH on the feasibility of using DOACs in the treatment of CAT.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.