Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results

Results found: 18

Number of results on page
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  measurement uncertainty
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Human Movement
|
2011
|
vol. 12
|
issue 1
41-45
EN
Purpose. The main purpose of this study is to verify the accuracy of body composition measurements by the BIA method, using TANITA 418 MA unit. Basic procedures. For purposes of our study we decided to use the type-A uncertainty evaluation method (statistical processing of measured data). To formulate diagnostic error for the BIA method we used typical (standard) error of measurement from differences between pairs of repeated measurements - which is in principle a mean error of the test. The research was carried out on a group of 10 students whose field of study is physical education and sport. These students were chosen from the total number of 74 students in such a way that they represent as wide range of fat fraction as possible. Representation of their fat fraction oscillated between 9.0 to 31.2% of body fat. Input value of body fat, which was the basic criterion for selection of students to the measurement etalon, was determined by the DEXA method. Main findings. We described the uncertainty (type A) in selected file of etalons by an average value and by a standard deviation in percentage of fat: 0.13 ± 0.05. A diagnostic error of the method expressed by means of typical (standard) error of measurement was 0.38% of body fat. Conclusion. Considering the detected values of uncertainty (type A) and of typical error of measurement, we can conclude that measurement of body composition by the BIA method using TANITA 418 MA unit is sufficiently accurate for requirements of practical use. The necessary condition for the above mentioned measurement accuracy is a strict observance of standard measurement conditions.
Open Chemistry
|
2007
|
vol. 5
|
issue 2
557-569
EN
This paper presents an evaluation of measurement uncertainty regarding the results of anion (nitrate and sulphate) concentrations in wastewater. Anions were determined by ion chromatography (EN ISO 10304-2, 1996). The major sources of uncertainty regarding the measurements’ results were identified as contributions to linear least - square or weighted regression lines, precision, trueness, storage conditions, and sampling. Determination of anions in wastewater is very important for the purification procedure, especially the amount of nitrate in waste and potable waters. The determined expanded uncertainty was 6.1 % for nitrate anions and 8.3 % for sulphate anions. The difference between measurement uncertainties determined by the two methods, the weighted and linear least - square methods, is negligible. [...]
PL
Celem pracy było opracowanie metody szacowania niepewności i wstępne określenie wartości szacowanych wielkości w przypadku wzorcowanych w LWWD dawkomierzy. Zastosowano metodę obliczania niepewności typu A i B wg międzynarodowej normy ISO. Uwzględniono stosowany w LWWD sposób wzorcowania dawkomierzy wg raportów Międzynarodowej Agencji Energii Atomowej. Przedstawione wyniki dotyczą wszystkich wzorcowanych w LWWD dawkomierzy. Zarówno szczegółowa analiza wszystkich etapów wzorcowania jak i otrzymane wyniki wskazują, że niepewność pomiarów jest w zakresie akceptowanym przez Polskie Centrum Akredytacji.
EN
The aim of the study was to work out a method of establishing the measurement uncertainty and determination of uncertainty values for calibration of dosemeters at the SSDL. For the determination of type A and B uncertainties, a method according to iternational ISO standard was used. The calibration procedures used at the SSDL, consistent with the reports of the International Atomic Energy Agency, were taken into account. The presented results apply to all dosimeters calibrated at the SSDL. The detailed analysis of every step of the calibration procedures and the results obtained show that the measurement uncertinty is within the limits accepted by the Polish Centre for Accreditation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.