Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl
Preferences help
Polish version English version Language
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results

Results found: 2

Number of results on page
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Russian Federation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Moskiewska i Kijowska wizja interpretacji sporów o przeszłość ciągłości historycznych korzeni wzajemnej państwowości

100%
Wyszczelski L.
Pomiędzy. Polonistyczno-Ukrainoznawcze Studia Naukowe
|
2022
|
issue 4(1)
129-142
PL
Napaść Federacji Rosyjskiej z 24 lutego 2022 na Ukrainę nie była dziełem przypadku, lecz strategii ponownego zajęcia pozycji supermocarstwa. W niej ważną rolę odgrywało odwoływanie się do przeszłości historycznej. Ta faktycznie jest wspólna w jej początkach, tym niemniej różnie interpretowana przez suwerenne od 31 lat państwo. Wychodząc z lansowanej od XVI w. wizji Rosji jako następczyni Cesarstwa Bizantyjskiego, putinowska Federacja Rosyjska rości sobie prawo do tworzenia jednego mocarstwa, skupiającego wszystkie dawne ziemie Imperium Rosyjskiego. Nie uznaje ona odrębnej państwowości oraz narodowości ukraińskiej. Dla realizacji tego celu nastąpiła opisywana wojna.
EN
Russian Federation’s attack of February 24, 2022 on Ukraine was no coincidence but a strategy to regain the status of superpower. Referring to history was its significant part. Indeed, that is a shared history, at least in the origin, though differently interpreted by both states, independent from 31 years. Based on the promoted from 16th Century vision of Russia as the Byzantine Empire’ successor, Putin’s Russian Federation claims the right to build an empire that would include all lands of the Russian Empire. It does not recognise independent statehood and Ukrainian nationality. The war was started to achieve that goal.
2
Content available remote

A study of antibiotic prescribing: the experience of Lithuanian and Russian GPs

100%
Jaruseviciene L., Radzeviciene-Jurgute R., Lazarus J., Jurgutis A., Ovhed I., Strandberg E., Bjerrum L.
|
2012
|
vol. 7
|
issue 6
790-799
EN
Background. Globally, general practitioners (GPs) write more than 90% of all antibiotic prescriptions. This study examines the experiences of Lithuanian and Russian GPs in antibiotic prescription for upper respiratory tract infections, including their perceptions of when it is not indicated clinically or pharmacologically. Methods. 22 Lithuanian and 29 Russian GPs participated in five focus group discussions. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results. We identified four main thematic categories: patients’ faith in antibiotics as medication for upper respiratory tract infections; patient potential to influence a GP’s decision to prescribe antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections; impediments perceived by GPs in advocating clinically grounded antibiotic prescribing with their patients, and strategies applied in physician-patient negotiation about antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections. Conclusions. Understanding the nature of physician-patient interaction is critical to the effective pursuit of clinically grounded antibiotic use as this study undertaken in Lithuania and the Russian Federation has shown. Both physicians and patients must be targeted to ensure correct antibiotic use. Further, GPs should be supported in enhancing their communication skills about antibiotic use with their patients and encouraged to implement a shared decision-making model in their practices.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.