Background Transpedicular screw placement remains the gold standard technique for destabilization of the lumbar spine. Material and methods This is a retrospective study that analyzes patients that underwent the spinal stabilization surgical procedure. We compared results from two independent neurosurgical centers. At the turn of years 2012-2015, O-arm and StealthStation neuronavigation system was used for implantation of transpedicular screws. In 2018 to 2020 transcutaneous pedicle screw placement procedure was performed using standard C-arm device. Results In 208 procedures performed with the O-arm device, the accuracy of the positioning of the screws was 98.08 %. Screw repositioning was necessary in 1.92 % of all cases. In 30 procedures that were performed using the C-arm, the accuracy of the screws was 86.7% and the screw reposition procedure accounted for 10% (in one case crews were not replaced due to clinical sequelae). Conclusions Our data show that the spinal fusion with the O-arm tool has more accuracy, thus might be more indicated in procedures that require minimally invasive spinal stabilization.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.