Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results

Results found: 2

Number of results on page
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
|
|
vol. 85
|
issue 5
262-270
EN
was to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) during operations of endocrine glands tumors. Material and methods. The study was conducted in patients who underwent endocrine operation in Department of Endocrine, General and Vascular Surgery, Medical University in Łódź in 2008-2011. Results. Patients with thyroid cancer recurrences:in study group we managed shorter lesion access time (10 ± 4.47 min vs 16.78 ± 8.9 min; p=0.04). Time of surgery was also shorter in study group (75 ± 30.17 minvs 85,71 ± 38.92 min), but it was not significant (p=0.46). The use of IOUS did not affect the hospitalization time (2.91 ± 1.64 days vs 3 ± 1.66 days; p=0.820), intraoperative blood loss (45.45 ± 105.96 ml vs 40 ± 82.89 ml; p=0.972) and the rate of intraoperative complications (1/11 - 9.09% vs 2/14 - 14.29%; p=1). Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: the time of surgery (58± 22.74 min vs 65 ± 19.6 min; p=0.336) and the lesion access time (13.33 ± 7,94 min vs 17.25 ± 8.19 min; p=0.169) were shorter in study group. Hospitalization time was longer in study group (6.13 ± 5.3 days vs 4.45 ± 4.58 days; p=0.079). The rate of intraoperative complications was higher in study group (3/15 - 20% vs 2/20 - 10%; p=0.631). None of this results were statistically significant (p≤0.05). Patients who underwent open adrenalectomy: in study group we managed significantly shorter time of surgery (70 ± 44.35 min vs 80.12 ± 29.60 min; p=0.033) and shorter lesion access time (12 ± 8.88 min vs 17.37 ± 7.42 min; p=0.045). The use of IOUS did not affect the hospitalization time (5.6 ± 1.65 days vs 6.35 ± 2.38 days; p=0.429), intraoperative blood loss (110 ± 164.65 ml vs 172.5 ± 226.35 ml; p=0.442) and rate of intraoperative complications (0/10 vs 1/40; p=1). Patients who underwent videoscopicadrenalectomy: in study group we managed to get shortertime of surgery (89.44 ± 27.11 min vs 109.12 ± 33.88 min; p=0.034) and shorter lesion access time (28.61 ± 14.93 min vs 45.98 ± 20.44 min; p=0.002). Intraoperative blood loss was also significantly lower in study group (86.11 ± 157 ml vs 169.27 ± 201.04 ml; p=0.037). The use of IOUS did not affect the hospitalization time (4.39 ± 3.27 days vs 3.83 ± 3.67 days; p=0.227), the rate of intraoperative complications (0/18 vs. 2/41; p=1) and the conversion rate (2/20-10% vs. 5/46- 10.87%; p=1). Conclusions. 1.During adrenalectomies this technique facilitates finding the pathological lesion shortening the time of access to the tumor and procedure duration. 2. IOUS is useful for determining the tumor relationship with the surrounding anatomical structures. 3. IOUS isa useful technique in the assessment of adrenal tumor infiltration of vena cava. 4. The use of IOUS allows the surgeon to assess anatomical relationships in the real time, after incision and retraction of tissues. 5. During operations of thyroid cancer recurrences using this technique makes easier to find a lesion in the operated area and it is possible to asses radical of surgery. 6. The use of IOUS allows to find pathological parathyroid glands inside thyroid gland. 7. IOUS is useful in the detection of thyroid pathology during parathyroidectomy.
EN
The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasonography during videoscopic adrenalectomy.Material and methods. The study was conducted in patients undergoing extraperitoneal videoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours in the Department of Endocrine, General and Vascular Surgery of the Medical University in Łódź in 2008-2011.Results. The active group consisted of 20 patients in whom navigation with the use of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) was used in the course of surgery. The comparison group consisted of 46 patients operated without the use of IOUS. In the active group, we managed to obtain a shorter time of surgery by almost 20 min (89.44 ± 27.11 min vs 109.12 ± 33.88 min; p=0.034) and a shorter lesion access time by more than 15 min (28.61 ± 14.93 min vs 45.98 ± 20.44 min; p=0.002). Intraoperative blood loss was also significantly lower in the active group (86.11 ± 157 ml vs 169.27 ± 201.04 ml; p=0.037). In contrast, the use of IOUS did not affect the hospitalisation time (4.39 ± 3.27 days vs 3.83 ± 3.67 days; p=0.227), the rate of intraoperative complications (0/18 vs 2/41; p=1) and the conversion rate (2/20 - 10% vs 5/46 - 10.87%; p=1).Conclusions. 1. Intraoperative ultrasonography is useful for determining the tumour relationship with the surrounding anatomical structures. 2. Intraoperative ultrasonography is a useful technique in the assessment of adrenal tumour infiltration of the surrounding tissues. 3. This technique facilitates finding the pathological lesion, shortening the time of access to the tumour and procedure duration (thus reducing the burden for the patient). 4. Reduced blood loss was also obtained owing to the use of IOUS.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.