Clareon® – nowa generacja implantów wewnątrzgałkowych w systemie preloadowanym AutonoMe

• Authors: Wojciech Kołodziejczyk , Elżbieta Jadowska , Bartłomiej Kałużny

Title variants

EN

Clareon® – a new generation of intraocular implants in the pre-loaded AutonoMe system

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Innowacyjność konstrukcji sztucznych soczewek wewnątrzgałkowych znacząco wpływa na komfort życia pacjenta po zabiegu fakoemulsyfikacji zaćmy. W czasach intensywnego rozwoju chirurgii zaćmy operator ma wybór najlepszej opcji implantu i odpowiedniej procedury leczenia. Technologia produkcji soczewek jest obszernym obszarem badań i stanowi wyzwanie dla wielu producentów zarówno pod względem nowych biomateriałów, jak i ich właściwości fizycznych, mechanicznych oraz optycznych.

EN

Innovation in the construction of artificial intraocular lenses has a major impact on the patient’s life comfort after cataract phacoemulsification surgery. In the times of intensive development of cataract surgery, the operator has the choice of the best implant option and the right treatment procedure. Lens production technology is a large area of research and a challenge for many manufacturers in terms of new biomaterials as well as their physical, mechanical and optical properties.

Keywords

EN

biomateriał; biomechanika; biooptyka; chirurgia zaćmy

Discipline

• MEDICINE: MEDICINE

• Publisher: Medical Education
• Journal: OphthaTherapy
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 143-148

Contributors

author

Wojciech Kołodziejczyk

• Klinika Okulistyczna Provisus, Częstochowa

author

Elżbieta Jadowska

• 1. Dział Medyczny, Alcon Polska. 2. Oddział Okulistyczny, Szpital Wojewódzki im. Mikołaja Kopernika w Koszalinie

author

Bartłomiej Kałużny

• 1. Klinika Okulistyki i Optometrii, Katedra Chorób Oczu, Collegium Medicum w Bydgoszczy, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. 2. Klinika Okulistyczna Oftalmika, Bydgoszcz

References

• 1. Clareon® AutonoMe™ Directions for Use.
• 2. Minami H, Torii K, Hiroi K, et al. Glistening of the acrylic intraocular lenses. Rinsho Ganka 1999; 53: 991-994.
• 3. Microvacuole Evaluation of Clareon and Other Marketed IOLs. Alcon internal report TDCO-0053516, effective February 28, 2017.
• 4. Łabuz G, Reus NJ, van den Berg TJ. Straylight from glistenings in intraocular lences: In vivo study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43: 102-108.
• 5. Auffarth G, Schickhardt S, Wang Q, et al. Laboratory evaluation of the new CLAREON hydrophobic acrylic IOL material: biomaterial properties and capsular bag behawior. Presentation at the ESCRS October 7–11, 2017, Lisbon.
• 6. Miyata A, Uchida N, Nakajima K, et al. Clinical and experimential observation of glistening in acrylic intraocular lenses. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001; 45: 564-569.
• 7. Clareon and Marketed IOL Slit Lamp Surface Haze. Alcon internal technical report TDCO-0053487, effective February 28, 2017.
• 8. Imaging of the Usable Optic Diameter of Clareon® SY60WF, TECNIS ZCB00, and enVista MX60 IOLs. Alcon internal technical report TDOC-0053803, effective July 12, 2017.
• 9. Davison JA. Positive and negative dysphotopsia in patients with acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000; 26: 1346- 1355.
• 10. Clareon SY60WF Axial Displacement Study at Varied Compressions. Alcon internal technical report TDOC-0054028, effective July, 2017.
• 11. Imroved Milled Quality of Clareon IOLs. Alcon internal technical report TDOC-0053598, effective March 13, 2017.
• 12. Microvacuole Evaluation of Clareon and Other Marketed IOLs. Alcon internal report TDCO-0053516, effective February 28, 2017.
• 13. Werner L, Das K, Collins S, et al. Model eye and in vitro assessment of positive dysphotopsia or glare types photic phenomena: a comparison of a new material IOL to other monofocal intraocular lenses. Presentation at the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) annual meeting; October 7–11, 2011; Lisbon, Portugal.
• 14. Wiritsch MG, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Effect of haptic design on change in axial lens position after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 45-51.
• 15. Koshy JJ, Nishi Y, Hirnschall N, et al. Rotational stability of a single-piece toric acrylic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: 1665-1670.
• 16. Nejima R, Miyai T, Kataoka Y, et al. Prospective intrapatient comparison of 6.0-millimeter optic single-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 585-590.
• 17. Lane SS, Burgi P, Milios GS, et al. Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30: 2397-2402.
• 18. Vasavada A, Singh R. Relationship between lens and capsular bag size. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 547-551.
• 19. Lane SS, Collins S, Das K, et al. Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of a new single-piece intraocular lens as compared to commercially available IOLs. Presentation at the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) annual meeting; October 7–11, 2017; Lisbon, Portugal.
• 20. Nozzle Preference and Delivery System Performance Study between AutonoMe and UltraSert. V3.5 Alcon internal technical report TDOC-0053876, effective 11 July 2017.

• Document Type: article