PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2017 | 77 | 2 | 226-241
Article title

Technology of Power in Philip K. Dick’s Do Android Dream of Electric Sheep?

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The science fiction of Philip Kindred Dick is a manifestation of the unprecedented challenges of man in modern times. This essay is a sociological study of Dick’s Do Androids Dream of Electric sheep? based on Michel Foucault’s concepts as well as Jean Baudrillard, and Thomas Mathiesen’s theories about power and its techniques. The library research method is used to trace some elements of the technology of power and the sociopolitical issues in multiple layers of the novel which reflects implicitly the nineteen sixties’ mood. The high-tech society of it is watched, controlled and conducted through advanced devices, media, consumerism, and pseudo- religion doctrine. The Foucauldian surveillance and panopticism are discussed in this carceral society where the minds of the individuals are routinely inspected in search for deviancy; and where their moods are regulated and their feeling are shared voluntarily. In addition to panopticism, due to the important role of the media in the novel, Mathiesen’s synopticism is discussed. The man’s efforts for compensating what he had destroyed i.e. the devastated nature result in Baudrillard’s concepts of hyperreality and simulation that blur the line between real and unreal. Do Androids Dream illuminates the revolutionary mood of nineteen sixties, the uprising of the youth and marginal groups against the prevalent beliefs and values. It also reflects the anxieties of atomic age, cold war paranoia, and McCarthyism. In the novel, the individuals are ubiquitously surveilled and mercilessly conducted; the truth does not have an existence of its own, and it’s just part of the regime.
Year
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
226-241
Physical description
References
  • [1] Avner Segall, et al. Social Studies--the Next Generation: Re-searching in the Postmodern. Bern: Peter Lang, 2006.
  • [2] Bacon, Sir Francis. The New Atlantis. The Floating Press, 2009.
  • [3] Baudrillard, Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. n.d. PDF file.
  • [4] Blades, Andrew. 20th Century American Literatre. Lodon: York Press, 2011.
  • [5] Booker, M. Keith. A Practical Introduction to Literary Theory and Criticism. New York: Longman Publishers USA, 1996.
  • [6] Booker, M. Keith. The Dystopian Impulse in Modern Literature: Fiction as Social Criticism. London: Greenwood Press, 1994.
  • [7] Bradbury, Malcom. The Modern American Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • [8] Castle, Gregory. The Blackwell Guide to Literary Theory. Ed. Jonathan Wordsworth. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
  • [9] Dick, Philip K. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? n.d. PDF file.
  • [10] Dominic Baker-Smith, C. C. Barfoot. Between Dream and Nature: Essays on Utopia and Dystopia. Vol. 61. Amesterdam: Rodopi, 1987.
  • [11] Eliot, T. S. The Wasteland and Other Writings. New York: The Modern Library, 2002.
  • [12] Ericson, Richard V., ed. Social Forces: Reviewed Work: The Culture of Surveillance: Discipline and Social Control in the United States. Vol. 76. 1998. 3 vols.
  • [13] Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
  • [14] Foucault, Michel.. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Ed. Colin Gordon. Trans. Colin Gordon et al. New York: Pantheon Books, 1980.
  • [15] Geetha, M., Theory of Dystopia unfolded - A Bird's-eye View of Shirshendue Mukhopadhyay's The Insect. Journal of Humanities And Social Science 19.7 (2014) 117-119
  • [16] James Matthew Morris, Andrea L. Kross. Historical Dictionary of Utopianism. Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 2004.
  • [17] Klages, Mary. Key Terms in Literary Theory. London, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2012.
  • [18] Mathiesen, Thomas. The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault's `Panopticon' Revisited. Theoretical Criminology 1.2 (1997) 215-234
  • [19] Mendlesohn, Edward James and Farah, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • [20] Micehel Foucault. Dir. Vincent Monnikendam. 1971. Web.
  • [21] Vincent B. Leitch et al. The Norton Anthology Theory and Criticism. Ed. Vincent B. Leitch. New York: W. W. Norton & company, Inc., 2001.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-f8b843a7-e8c8-4191-804e-bc98440a0b60
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.