PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 10 | 56-70
Article title

Tax Evasion, Tax Rate and Economic Stability

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The issue of tax evasion has become a major problem for governments. Nowadays, governments are actively trying to reduce the possibility that people misrepresent their income. Tax evasion refers to all illegal ways that people employ in order to avoid paying taxes. Underreporting income, profit or over reporting the amount of tax deductions are some well-known ways of misrepresenting tax liabilities. This paper attempts to study the relationship between tax evasion and tax rates and economic stability. Is higher taxes leads to more unreported activities? How does higher tax evasion affect economic stability? Is the causality run from tax evasion to economic activity or the other way around? This study attempts to examine the relationship between economic stability with tax evasion and tax rates using a fixed panel data model for a selected number of countries including OECD countries based on data comprised of the period of 1990 – 2013, by using Panel data technique. The main contribution of this paper will be the study of the relationship between tax evasion and economic stability. Results show that dominant negative relationship between taxes and output volatility, our estimation results show that tax ratio is positively and significantly related to economic stability and tax evasion is negatively and significantly related to tax income.
Year
Volume
10
Pages
56-70
Physical description
References
  • [1] Abdullah. Nor’Aznin. Hussin, Abu Bakar and Sallahuddin Hassan, (2010), “Analysis of FDI Inflows to china from selected Asian countries: A panel Cointegration approach”, International Economic Conference on Trade and Industry (IECTI).
  • [2] Baltagi, B.H., (2005), Econometrics Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, Chichester.
  • [3] Christopoulos, K. Dimitris and Tsions, G. Efthymios (2004), “Financial development and economic growth: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 73, pp. 55-74.
  • [4] Dahduli, Mahmoud S., (2009), “Islamic Banking and Economic Development”, working paper series, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1616624 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1616624.
  • [5] Maddala, G.S., Kim, I.-M., (1998), “Unit Roots, Cointegration, and Structural Change”, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
  • [6] Pedroni, P. (1996). Fully Modified OLS for Heterogenous Cointegrated Panels and The Case Of Purchasing Power Parity. Working paper, North American Econometric Society Summer Meeting, 96-120.
  • [7] Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors,” Oxford Buellton Economic Statistics, Special Issue 61: 653-678.
  • [8] Pedroni, P. (2000). Fully-Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegration Panel. in Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Economic 15, 93-130.
  • [9] Pedroni, P. (2001). Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels. The Review Economic Statistics, 83(4), 727-731.
  • [10] Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and finite samples properties of pooled time series Tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economic Theory 20: 597-625.
  • [11] Pesaran, H.M. and Shin, Y. (1995), “Autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis”, DAE Working Paper Series No. 9514, Department of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  • [12] Pesaran, H.M., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. (1996), “Testing the existence of a long-run relationship”, DAE Working Paper Series No. 9622, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  • [13] Pesaran, H.M., Shin, Y. and Smith, R. (2001), “Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 16, pp. 289-326.
  • [14] Phillips, P.C.B., Hansen, B.E., (1990), “Statistical inference in individual variables regression with I(1) process”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 57, pp. 99-125.
  • [15] Tanzi, V. (1983) The Underground Economy in United States: Annual Estimates, 1930-80. IMF Staff Papers 30:2, 283-305.
  • [16] Guttmann, P. M. (1977) Subterranean Economy. Financial Analysis Journal November, 26-27.
  • [17] Kemal, M. A (2003),Underground economy and tax evasion in Pakistan: A critical evaluation, http://www.pide.org.pk/Research/Report184.pdf.
  • [18] Martinez-Vazquez, J., Vulovic, V., & Lui, Y. (2009). Direct versus indirect taxation: Trends, theory and economic significance. International Studies Program Working Paper, 09 – 11, Georgia State University.
Document Type
undetermined
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-f0b7a4a3-37e9-4e4a-b495-4b93c29a51b2
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.