Błony nasiatkówkowe – współczesne metody diagnostyki i leczenia

• Authors: Magdalena Trębińska , Sławomir Cisiecki

Title variants

EN

Epiretinal membranes – current diagnostics methods and surgical treatment

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Błony nasiatkówkowe są częstym schorzeniem dotykającym głównie osoby po 50. r.ż. Podstawową metodą obrazowania błon nasiatkówkowych jest optyczna koherentna tomografia, zaś metodę z wyboru w leczeniu objawowych błon nasiatkówkowych stanowi witrektomia. W niniejszym artykule omówiono zastosowanie witrektomii w leczeniu błon nasiatkówkowych z uwzględnieniem aktualnego stanu wiedzy na temat wskazań do leczenia operacyjnego oraz możliwych powikłań pooperacyjnych.

EN

Epiretinal membranes occur in population over 50 years old. Optical coherence tomography has become a useful tool in diagnosis of this condition. Pars plana vitrectomy is a standard procedure in treatment of epiretinal membranes. The aim of this article is to present a current state of knowledge about surgical treatment and its complications.

Keywords

EN

ILM; błony nasiatkówkowe; witrektomia

Discipline

• MEDICINE: MEDICINE

• Publisher: Medical Education
• Journal: OphthaTherapy
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 101-105

Contributors

author

Magdalena Trębińska

• Miejskie Centrum Medyczne im. dr. Karola Jonschera w Łodzi

author

Sławomir Cisiecki

• Miejskie Centrum Medyczne im. dr. Karola Jonschera w Łodzi

References

• 1. Foos RY. Vitreoretinal juncture; epiretinal membranes and vitreous. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16: 416-422.
• 2. Ducournau D, Ducournau Y. A closer look at the ILM. Removal of the ILM induces a cellular response that allows the retina to fight against edema. Retinal Physician 2008(suppl 6): 4-15.
• 3. Mori K, Gehlbach PL, Sano A, et al. Comparison of epiretinal membranes of differing pathogenesis using optical coherence tomography. Retina 2004; 24: 57-62.
• 4. Mitamura Y, Hirano K, Baba T, Yamamoto S. Correlation of visual recovery with presence of photoreceptor inner/outer segment junction in optical coherence images after epiretinal membrane surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 171-175.
• 5. Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH, Yu HG. Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147: 473-480.
• 6. Rice TA, De Bustros S, Michels RG, et al. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 602-610.
• 7. Michels RG. Vitreous surgery for macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol 1981; 92: 628-639.
• 8. Grewing R, Mester U. Results of surgery for epiretinal membranes and their recurrences. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 323-326.
• 9. Byon IS, Jo SH, Kwon HJ, et al. Changes in Visual Acuity after Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Removal: Good versus Poor Preoperative Visual Acuity. Ophthalmologica 2015; 234: 127-134.
• 10. Hiscott PS, Grierson I, McLeod D. Natural history of fibrocellular epiretinal membranes: a quantitative, autoradiographic, and immunohistochemical study. Br J Ophthalmol 1985; 69: 810-823.
• 11. Michels RG. A clinical and histopathologic study of epiretinal membranes affecting the macula and removed by vitreous surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1982; 80: 580-656.
• 12. Rahman R, Stephenson J. Early surgery for epiretinal membrane preserves more vision for patients. Eye (Lond) 2014; 28(4): 410-414.
• 13. Kofod M, Christensen UC, la Cour M. Deferral of surgery for epiretinal membranes: Is it safe? Results of a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 100(5): 688-692.
• 14. Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Gass CA, et al. The effect of indocyanine-green on functional outcome of macular pucker surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135(3): 328-337.
• 15. Garweg JG, Bergstein D, Windisch B, et al. Recovery of visual field and acuity after removal of epiretinal and inner limiting membranes. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92(2): 220-224.
• 16. Hillenkamp J, Saikia P, Herrmann WA, et al. Surgical removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane with or without the assistance of indocyanine green: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245(7): 973-979.
• 17. Michels RG. Vitrectomy for macular pucker. Ophthalmology 1984; 91: 1384-1388.
• 18. Margherio RR, Cox MS, Trese MT, et al. Removal of epimacular membranes. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 1075-1083.
• 19. Margherio RR. Vitrectomy for macular pucker. Ophthalmology 1984; 91: 1387-1388.
• 20. Fang X, Chen Z, Weng Y, et al. Surgical outcome after removing of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane in young patients. Eye(Lond) 2008; 22(11): 1430-1435.
• 21. Clark A, Balducci N, Pichi F, et al. Swelling of the arcuate nerve fiber layer after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 2012; 32: 1608-1613.
• 22. Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P, et al. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 2279-2283.
• 23. Kumagai K, Ogino N, Furukaw M, et al. Retinal thickness after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole and epiretinal membrane. Clin Ophthalmol 2012; 6: 679-688.
• 24. Wong JG, Sachdev N, Beaumont PE, et al. Visual outcomes following vitrectomy and peeling of epiretinal membrane. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2005; 33: 373-378.
• 25. De Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG. Nuclear sclerosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105: 160-164.
• 26. Thompson JT. The role of patient age and intraocular gases in cataract progression following vitrectomy for macular holes and epiretinal membranes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2003; 101: 485-498.

• Document Type: article