PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
Journal
2016 | 3 | 2 | 101-105
Article title

Błony nasiatkówkowe – współczesne metody diagnostyki i leczenia

Content
Title variants
EN
Epiretinal membranes – current diagnostics methods and surgical treatment
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
PL
Błony nasiatkówkowe są częstym schorzeniem dotykającym głównie osoby po 50. r.ż. Podstawową metodą obrazowania błon nasiatkówkowych jest optyczna koherentna tomografia, zaś metodę z wyboru w leczeniu objawowych błon nasiatkówkowych stanowi witrektomia. W niniejszym artykule omówiono zastosowanie witrektomii w leczeniu błon nasiatkówkowych z uwzględnieniem aktualnego stanu wiedzy na temat wskazań do leczenia operacyjnego oraz możliwych powikłań pooperacyjnych.
EN
Epiretinal membranes occur in population over 50 years old. Optical coherence tomography has become a useful tool in diagnosis of this condition. Pars plana vitrectomy is a standard procedure in treatment of epiretinal membranes. The aim of this article is to present a current state of knowledge about surgical treatment and its complications.
Keywords
Discipline
Publisher
Journal
Year
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
101-105
Physical description
Contributors
  • Miejskie Centrum Medyczne im. dr. Karola Jonschera w Łodzi
  • Miejskie Centrum Medyczne im. dr. Karola Jonschera w Łodzi
References
  • 1. Foos RY. Vitreoretinal juncture; epiretinal membranes and vitreous. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16: 416-422.
  • 2. Ducournau D, Ducournau Y. A closer look at the ILM. Removal of the ILM induces a cellular response that allows the retina to fight against edema. Retinal Physician 2008(suppl 6): 4-15.
  • 3. Mori K, Gehlbach PL, Sano A, et al. Comparison of epiretinal membranes of differing pathogenesis using optical coherence tomography. Retina 2004; 24: 57-62.
  • 4. Mitamura Y, Hirano K, Baba T, Yamamoto S. Correlation of visual recovery with presence of photoreceptor inner/outer segment junction in optical coherence images after epiretinal membrane surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 171-175.
  • 5. Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH, Yu HG. Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147: 473-480.
  • 6. Rice TA, De Bustros S, Michels RG, et al. Prognostic factors in vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes of the macula. Ophthalmology 1986; 93: 602-610.
  • 7. Michels RG. Vitreous surgery for macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol 1981; 92: 628-639.
  • 8. Grewing R, Mester U. Results of surgery for epiretinal membranes and their recurrences. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 323-326.
  • 9. Byon IS, Jo SH, Kwon HJ, et al. Changes in Visual Acuity after Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Removal: Good versus Poor Preoperative Visual Acuity. Ophthalmologica 2015; 234: 127-134.
  • 10. Hiscott PS, Grierson I, McLeod D. Natural history of fibrocellular epiretinal membranes: a quantitative, autoradiographic, and immunohistochemical study. Br J Ophthalmol 1985; 69: 810-823.
  • 11. Michels RG. A clinical and histopathologic study of epiretinal membranes affecting the macula and removed by vitreous surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1982; 80: 580-656.
  • 12. Rahman R, Stephenson J. Early surgery for epiretinal membrane preserves more vision for patients. Eye (Lond) 2014; 28(4): 410-414.
  • 13. Kofod M, Christensen UC, la Cour M. Deferral of surgery for epiretinal membranes: Is it safe? Results of a randomised controlled trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2015; 100(5): 688-692.
  • 14. Haritoglou C, Gandorfer A, Gass CA, et al. The effect of indocyanine-green on functional outcome of macular pucker surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 135(3): 328-337.
  • 15. Garweg JG, Bergstein D, Windisch B, et al. Recovery of visual field and acuity after removal of epiretinal and inner limiting membranes. Br J Ophthalmol 2008; 92(2): 220-224.
  • 16. Hillenkamp J, Saikia P, Herrmann WA, et al. Surgical removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane with or without the assistance of indocyanine green: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007; 245(7): 973-979.
  • 17. Michels RG. Vitrectomy for macular pucker. Ophthalmology 1984; 91: 1384-1388.
  • 18. Margherio RR, Cox MS, Trese MT, et al. Removal of epimacular membranes. Ophthalmology 1985; 92: 1075-1083.
  • 19. Margherio RR. Vitrectomy for macular pucker. Ophthalmology 1984; 91: 1387-1388.
  • 20. Fang X, Chen Z, Weng Y, et al. Surgical outcome after removing of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane in young patients. Eye(Lond) 2008; 22(11): 1430-1435.
  • 21. Clark A, Balducci N, Pichi F, et al. Swelling of the arcuate nerve fiber layer after internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 2012; 32: 1608-1613.
  • 22. Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P, et al. Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 2279-2283.
  • 23. Kumagai K, Ogino N, Furukaw M, et al. Retinal thickness after vitrectomy and internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole and epiretinal membrane. Clin Ophthalmol 2012; 6: 679-688.
  • 24. Wong JG, Sachdev N, Beaumont PE, et al. Visual outcomes following vitrectomy and peeling of epiretinal membrane. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2005; 33: 373-378.
  • 25. De Bustros S, Thompson JT, Michels RG. Nuclear sclerosis after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105: 160-164.
  • 26. Thompson JT. The role of patient age and intraocular gases in cataract progression following vitrectomy for macular holes and epiretinal membranes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2003; 101: 485-498.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-ed9be04f-3c85-40a3-bf3b-462ee217ff1a
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.