Short communication: directing cheerleader’s gaze influences motor behaviour in somersaults

• Authors: Thomas Heinen , Hannah Vollmer
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Eye, head, and body movements are thought to be functionally coupled in the performance of complex skills, such as somersaults with and without twists (Davlin et al. 2001; von Laßberg et al. 2014). Directing the gaze to specific locations in the environment during the takeoff phase in somersaults could influence takeoff kinematics and, as a consequence, the subsequent flight phase. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between gaze direction during takeoff and the corresponding movement kinematics when performing backward somersaults in cheerleading. N = 11 cheerleaders performed standing backward somersaults in three experimental conditions (straight gaze direction, elevated gaze direction, depressed gaze direction). Results revealed that cheerleaders exhibited a larger hip angle during takeoff and longer flight duration of the somersaults when their gaze was elevated during the takeoff phase, thereby supporting the notion that a functional coupling seems to operate between gaze behaviour and motor behaviour in cheerleading. In daily practice, cheerleaders could try to focus their gaze on a point on the wall in front of them during the takeoff phase in somersaults in order to facilitate the development of a functional coupling between gaze behavior and motor behavior.

Keywords

EN

complex skill; visual perception; whole-body rotation

Discipline

• MEDICINE: MEDICINE

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Szczeciński. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
• Journal: Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 23-28

Contributors

author

Thomas Heinen

• University of Hildesheim, Institute of Sport Science, Hildesheim, Germany

author

Hannah Vollmer

• University of Hildesheim, Institute of Sport Science, Hildesheim, Germany

References

• 1.Arkaev L.I., Suchilin N.G. How to create champions. The theory and methodology of training top-class gymnasts. Human Kinetics. Champaign 2004.
• 2.Davlin C.D., Sands W.A., Shultz B.B. The role of vision in control of orientation in a back tuck somersault. Motor Control. 2001; 5: 337–346.
• 3.Davlin C.D., Sands W.A., Shultz B.B. Do gymnasts “spot” during a back tuck somersault. Int Sports J. 2004; 8 (2): 72–79.
• 4.Davids K., Button C., Bennett, S. Dynamics of skill acquisition: a constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics. Champaign 2008.
• 5.DeMers G.E. Utilizing visual reference points in spring board diving. Swimming World and Junior Swimmer. 1983; 24: 38–39, 41.
• 6.Enoka R.M. Neuromechanics of human movement (3rd ed.). Human Kinetics. Champaign 2002.
• 7.George G.S. Championship gymnastics. Biomechanical techniques for shaping winners. Designs for Wellness Press. Carlsbad 2010.
• 8.Heinen T., Jeraj D., Vinken P.M., Velentzas, K. Land where you look? – Functional relationships between gaze and movement behaviour in a backward salto. Biol Sport. 2012; 29: 177–183.
• 9.Simi Reality Motion Systems. Simi Motion version 8.5. Germany 2012.
• 10.Land M.F. The coordination of rotations of the eyes, head and trunk in saccadic turns produced in natural situations. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 159: 151–160.
• 11.Laßberg von C., Beykirch K.A., Mohler B.J., Bülthoff H.H. Intersegmental eye-head-body interactions during complex whole body movements. Plos One. 2014; 9 (4): 1–15. Luis M., Tremblay L. Visual feedback use during a back tuck somersault: evidence for optimal visual feedback utilization. Motor Control. 2008; 12: 210–218.
• 12.Mann D.T.Y., Williams A.M., Ward P., Janelle C.M. Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: a meta-analysis. J Sport Exercise Psy. 2007; 29: 457–478.
• 13.O’Regan J.K., Noë A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav Brain Sci. 2001; 24: 939–1031.
• 14.Raab M., de Oliveira R.F., Heinen T. How do people perceive and generate options? In: Progress in brain research: vol. 174. Mind and motion: the bidirectional link between thought and action. Eds. M. Raab, J.G. Johnson, H. Heekeren. Elsevier B.V. Amsterdam 2009: 49–59.
• 15.Vickers J.N. Perception, cognition, and decision training: the quiet eye in action. Human Kinetics, Champaign 2007.

• Document Type: article