PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2011 | 16 | 1 | 44-53
Article title

Klasyfikacja form radzenia sobie ze stresem oparta na kryterium celu i metody działania. Próba weryfikacji empirycznej

Content
Title variants
EN
Classification of coping with stress actions based on action’s aim and method criterion. Trial of empirical verification
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The aim of the study was to verify the model of coping actions according to which four types of coping may be distinguished: assertive, avoidant, adjusting and relaxing. A group of 62 subjects aged 25 to 50 were asked questions concerning recently experienced stressful event, stress intensity, coping actions and the outcome of the event. Answers concerning coping were classified independently by three judges to one of four categories proposed in the model. High index of agreement between three judges was assumed to be the criterion of the positive verification of the classification. Results show high level of agreement between the three independent judges, especially in case of assertive and relaxing coping actions which were also the most frequent in the group.
Keywords
Year
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
44-53
Physical description
References
  • Brandtstadter, J. (1992). Personal control over development: Implications of self efficacy. W: R. Schwarzer (red.) Self efficacy: Thought control of action (s. 127-145). Berlin: Taylor and Francis.
  • Bryant, F.B. (1989). A four factor model of perceived control: avoiding, coping, obtaining and savoring. Journal of Personality, 57, 4, 773–797.
  • Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing Coping Strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
  • Dunahoo, C.L., Hobfoll, S.E., Monnier, J., Hulsizer, M.R., Johnson, R. (1998). There is more than rugged individualism in coping. Part 1: Even the lone ranger had tonto. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 11, 137–165.
  • Endler, N.S., Parker, J.D. (1990). Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844–854.
  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 21, 219-239.
  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R.S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170.
  • Folkman, S., Lazarus, R., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., Gruen, R. (1996). Dynamics of a stressful encounter: Cognitive appraisal, coping and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 5, 992–1003.
  • Haan, N. (1977). Coping and defending: Processes of self – environment organization. New York: Academic Press.
  • Hobfoll, S.E. (2006). Stres, kultura i społeczność. Psychologia i filozofia stresu. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
  • Krohne, H.W. (1996). Individual differences in coping. W: M. Zeidner, N.S. Endler (red.) Handbook of coping (s. 381-409). New York: Wiley.
  • Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.
  • Łosiak, W. (1994). Dynamika emocji i radzenia sobie w stresie psychologicznym. Badania pacjentów chirurgicznych. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Łosiak, W. (2007). Natura stresu. Spojrzenie z perspektywy ewolucyjnej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Moos, R.H. (1993). Coping Responses Inventory: Adult form manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J.R., Snyder, S.S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self. A two process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37.
  • Strelau, J., Jaworowska, A., Wrześniewski, K., Szczepaniak, P. (2009). Kwestionariusz radzenia sobie w sytuacjach stresowych CISS . Podręcznik do polskiej normalizacji. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
  • Wrześniewski, K. (1996). Style a strategie radzenia sobie ze stresem. Problemy pomiaru. W: I. Heszen-Niejodek, Z. Ratajczak (red.) Człowiek w sytuacji stresu. Problemy teoretyczne i metodologiczne (s. 44-64). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-e9bc70af-d396-4f16-a5a7-c24eb88fa24b
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.