Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2017 | 90 | 11-30
Article title

A Quality Control Test for General X-Ray Machine

Title variants
Languages of publication
The aim of a quality assurance program is to assist a radio-diagnostic facility in consistently obtaining adequate radiological information with a minimum of dose and a minimum of cost. An integrated part of a quality assurance program is quality control ascertaining quality by measurements and other procedures. When procuring equipment, a specification is worked out taking into account all aspects of the performance of the equipment including the desired tolerances of technique factors. In this study the seven tests (beam alignment, beam collimation, reproducibility, accuracy of kv, time accuracy, half value layer (HVL) and leakage) were carried out for the newly installed General X-Ray machine at Nuclear Malaysia and were in the acceptable limits. Such a test will be the responsibility of a qualified physicist or engineer. The status test is carried out in order to establish the functional status of the equipment. The test is performed immediately after the acceptance test or as an integrated part of it. The test will be repeated when repair influencing the functional status has taken place like the acceptance test; the status test will comprise absolute measurements and will likewise be the responsibility of a qualified physicist or engineer.
Physical description
  • Nuclear Safety Department, Ministry of Science & Technology, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Teaching Hospital, Ministry of Health & Nutrition, Kurunegala, Sri Lanka
  • Nuclear Safety Department, Ministry of Science & Technology, Baghdad, Iraq
  • [1] Maria Lucia Nana I Ebisawa, Maria de Fatima A Magon, Yvone M Mascarenhas. Evaluation of X-ray machine quality control acceptance indices, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, Volume 10, Number 4, 2009, 252–259, DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3007
  • [2] Jimenez P, Borrás C, Fleitas I. Accreditation of diagnostic imaging services in developing countries. 2006. Pan American Journal of Public Health 20(2/3): 104–112
  • [3] Wagner LK, Fontenla DP, Kimme-Smith C, Rothenberg LN, Shepark J, Boone JM. Recommendations on performance characteristics of diagnostic exposure meters: Report of AAPM Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Task Group No. 6. Med Phys. 1992. AAPM 19(1): 231-241.
  • [4] Gray L, Dowling A, Gallagher A. et al. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems. Rad Protec Dosimetry, 2008, 129(1/3): 276–78
  • [5] Huda W, Nickoloff EL, Boone JM. Overview of patients dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50years. Med Phys. 2008, 35(12), 5713–28
  • [6] Ertuk SM, Ondategui-Parra S, Ros PR. Quality management in radiology: historical aspects and basic definitions. J Am Coll Radiol. 2005, 2(12), 985–991.
  • [7] Freitas MB, Yoshimura EM. Levantamento da Distribuição de Equipamentos de Diagnóstico por Imagem e da Frequência de Exames Radiológicos no Estado de São Paulo. Radiologia Brasileira. 2005, 38(5), 347–354.
  • [8] C.J. Martin. Management of patient dose in radiology in the UK. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 147 (3) (2011), pp. 355-372
  • [9] Wilbroad E. Muhogora, Nada A. Ahmed, Aziz Almosabihi, Jamila S. Alsuwaidi, Adnan Beganovic, Ciraj-Bjelac Olivera, et al. Patient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: initial results from IAEA projects. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, 190 (6) (2008), pp. 1453-1461
  • [10] Wilson M. Ngoye, Jenny A. Motto, Wilbroad E. Muhogora. Quality Control Measures in Tanzania: Is it done? Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 46 (2015), pp. S23-S30
  • [11] Ofori K. Eric, William K. Antwi, Diane N. Scutt, Matt Ward. Optimization of patient radiation protection in pelvic X-ray examination in Ghana. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 13 (4) (2012), pp. 160-171
  • [12] E.K. Osei, J. Darko. A survey of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures. ISRN Radiology, 2013 (2013), p. 204346,
  • [13] Seo Deoknam, Seogoo Jang, Jungmin Kim, Jungsu Kim, Dongwook Sung, HyunJi Kim. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 158 (1) (2014), pp. 22-27
  • [14] P. C. Shrimpton and B. F. Wall, The increasing importance of X ray computed tomography as a source of medical exposure, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, vol. 57, no. 1–4, pp. 413–415, 1995.
  • [15] R. R. Cruces, J. García-Granados, F. J. Diaz Romero, and J. Hernández Armas, Estimation of effective dose in some digital angiographic and interventional procedures, British Journal of Radiology, vol. 71, pp. 42–47, 1998
  • [16] C. H. McCollough, J. A. Christner, and J. M. Kofler, How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 194, no. 4, pp. 890–896, 2010
  • [17] J. Geleijns, J. G. Van Unnik, J. Zoetelief, D. Zweers, and J. J. Broerse, Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography, British Journal of Radiology, vol. 67, no. 796, pp. 360–365, 1994
  • [18] K. A. Jessen, P. C. Shrimpton, J. Geleijns, W. Panzer, and G. Tosi, Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 165–172, 1999
  • [19] J. E. Ngaile and P. K. Msaki, Estimation of patient organ doses from CT examinations in Tanzania, Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 80–94, 2006.
  • [20] E. K. Osei and R. Barnett, Software for the estimation of organ equivalent and effective doses from diagnostic radiology procedures, Journal of Radiological Protection, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 361–376, 2009.
  • [21] E. K. Osei and K. Faulkner, Fetal doses from radiological examinations, British Journal of Radiology, vol. 72, pp. 773–780, 1999
  • [22] A. Khursheed, M. C. Hillier, P. C. Shrimpton, and B. F. Wall, Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations, British Journal of Radiology, vol. 75, no. 898, pp. 819–830, 2002
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.