Physical Activity of University St udents with Various Study Profile

• Authors: Dana Masaryková , Jana Labudová , Ivan Matúš
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Introduction. The current problem of physical inactivity in population is analysed by professionals in various age categories. One of the groups, not that often observed, are university s tudents, who should be able to present their attitude to regular physical activity as well as its contribution to healthy lifestyle. The aim of the research was to find out the structure of physical activities in university students in various study progra mmes (teacher programmes, sport programmes) and also to determine their attitude to physical activity and the reasons for (not) including physical activity in daily regimen. Methods . The research group involved students of the Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Comenius University (n=53, 26 men and 27 women), Faculty of Education, University of Trnava (n=53, only women) a University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice (n=45, 30 men, 15 women). The data were collected by questionnaire with open, semi - open and c losed questions. The data were analysed by MS Excel and non - parametric Chi - square test. Results. The students with sports profile presented more positive attitude to physical activity than the other students of other study profile. On the other, hand stude nts of the teacher study profile were least satisfied with the offer of physical activities at their faculty and they would like to perform more activities in their leisure time if they had better conditions. The reasons for not performing physical activit y were also various. Students with teacher profile chose not enough time (52%), however, students with sports profile chose their health condition as the priority (37%). The reasons for including physical activity in daily regimen were in the group of teac her students supporting health and body forming, the other groups of students preferred fun and challenge. The time spent with sedentary activities was not different regarding the study profile but regarding sex. The results showed a clear difference betwe en men and women, where the most men chose 1 - 2 hours of sedentary activities every day, whereas women suggested 3 - 4 hours of sedentary activities. Conclusion. Our research data confirm the importance of analysing the reasons for performing or not performin g physical activities by university students, which could help to create an optimal model of a physical programme for various study profiles. The results suggest that the students of teacher programmes will prefer health - oriented activities with emphasizin g body forming, whereas students of sports programmes will prefer activities focused on performance, challenge and experience.

Keywords

EN

healthy lifestyle; physical activity; physical inactivity; university students

• Publisher: Institute of Physical Education and Tourism. Jan Długosz University of Czestochowa
• Journal: Physical Activity Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 4
• Pages: 107-114

Contributors

author

Dana Masaryková

• Trnava University, Facul ty of Education, Trnava, Slovakia

author

Jana Labudová

• Comenius University, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Bratislava, Slovakia

author

Ivan Matúš

• University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice, Institute of Physical Education and Sport, Košice, Slovakia

References

• 1. Bray SR, Born HA: Transition to university and vigorous physical activity: Implications for health and psychological well - being. In Jo urnal of American College Health, 2004 ; 52(4):181 - 188. Doi:10.3200/JACH.52.4.181 - 188
• 2. Cepková A : Pohybová aktivita, zdravie, zdatnosť vysokoškolákov, 2015
• 3. Haag H: Philosophical and anthropological justification for physical education in and outside of schools. In: FIEP bulletin, 2013 ; 83(3): 216 - 218
• 4. Haase A, Steptoe A, Sallis JF, Wardle J: Leisure - tim e physical activity in university students from 23 countries: associations with health beliefs, risk awareness, and national economic development. In Preventive Medicine , 2004 ; 39(1) : 182 – 190
• 5. Hardman K: Worldwide survey on the state and status of physical education in schools: Foundations for deconstruction and reconstruction of physical education. In Physical Education : Deconstruction and reconstruction – Issues and directions, 2003
• 6. Ivaschenko S: Influence of individual training programs on learning effectiveness of students in higher educational institutions. In Physical Education: Quality in Management and Teaching, 2014
• 7. Kwan MY, Cairney J, Faulkner GE, Pullenavegum EE: Physical activity and other health - risk behaviours during the transition into adulthood: A longitudinal cohort study. In American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2012 ; 42(1),14 - 20. Doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.026
• 8. Palovičová J: Pravidelná pohybová aktivita v dennom režime vysokoškoláčok. In Súčasný stav a vývojové trendy vysokoškolskej telesnej výchovy a športu pred vstupom do Európskej únie, 2003 ; 52 – 56
• 9. Rodney JP, Royse KE, Benitez TJ, Pekmezi DW : Physical activi ty and quality of life among university students: exploring self - efficacy, self - esteem, and affect as potential mediators. In Quality of Life, 2014 ; 23 (2): 659 - 667
• 10. Sigmundova D, Chmelik F, Sigmund E, Feltlova D, Fromel K: Physical activity in the lifestyle of Czech university students: Meeting health recommendations. In European Journal of Sport Science, 2013 ; 13(6): 744 - 750. Doi:10.1080/17461.2013.776638
• 11. Šulc I: Telesná výchova a šport na vysokých školách. In Zborník vedeckej konferencie „Perspektívy škols kej telesnej výchovy a športu pre všetkých v SR“, 2001 ; 162 – 166
• 12. Zhao Y, Sigmund E, Sigmund D, Lu Y: Comparison of Physical Activity between Olomouc and Beijing University Students Using an International Physical Activity Questionnaire. In Acta Univ. Pala cki. Olomuc., Gymn, 2007 ; 37(4): 107 - 114

• Document Type: paper