PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 37 | 25-49
Article title

Yield Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) and Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Intercrop as Influenced by Planting Densities and Varieties of Sesame at Makurdi, Nigeria

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
A field experiment was conducted from July to October, in years 2014 and 2015 at the Research Farm, University of Agriculture, Makurdi, Nigeria, to evaluate the yield response of maize-sesame intercrop as influenced by planting densities of sesame and varieties of sesame, as well as to assess the yield advantages of the intercropping system. The factorial (3 x 3) combinations of the treatments were randomly arranged in a split-plot design, with four replications. The varieties of sesame (Ex Sudan, SN 603 and E-8) into maize constituted the main plots, while the planting densities of sesame (66,666, 88,888 and 133,333 plants ha-1 equivalent) into maize were assigned to the subplots. Results of study showed that intercropping maize with sesame variety ‘Ex Sudan’ produced the highest grain yield for maize and highest seed yield of 0.45 t ha-1 and 0.33 t ha-1 respectively, in years 2014 and 2015 for sesame. Sesame sown into maize at the density of 66,666 plants ha-1 produced the highest maize yield of 3.6 t ha-1 and 3.8 t ha-1 respectively, in years 2014 and 2015 and highest sesame yields in both years. Intercropping sesame variety ‘Ex Sudan’ into maize at the density of 66,666 plants ha-1 also gave the highest total intercrop yields, highest land equivalent coefficient (LEC) values, highest land equivalent ratio (LER) values of 1.83 and 1.80, highest percentage (%) land saved, lowest competitive ratio and lowest aggressivity. The implication of study showed that it is most advantageous having both crops in intercrop when sesame variety ‘Ex Sudan’ was sown into maize at the density of 66,666 plants ha-1. This should therefore be recommended for Makurdi location, Nigeria.
Discipline
Year
Volume
37
Pages
25-49
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Department of Crop Production, University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2373, Makurdi, Nigeria, mikejoy2005@yahoo.com
author
  • Department of Crop Production, University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2373, Makurdi, Nigeria
author
  • Department of Crop Production, University of Agriculture, P.M.B. 2373, Makurdi, Nigeria
References
  • [1] Adetiloye P.O., Ezedinma F.O.C., Okigbo B.N., Ecological Modeling 19 (1983) 27-39.
  • [2] Adeyemo M.O., Ogunwolu E.O., Journal of Agricultural Technology 4(1) (1996) 19-25.
  • [3] Adeyemo M.O., Ojo A.A., Gungula D.T., Trop. Oil Journal 1 (1992) 39-43.
  • [4] Awal M.A., Koshi H., Ikeda T., Agriculture for Meteorology 139 (2006) 74-83.
  • [5] Bedigan D., Crop Evolution 50 (2003) 779-787.
  • [6] Burden D. (2005). Sesame Profile. Available at http//:www.cropprofile.mht.accessed 15 January, 2008.
  • [7] Enwezor W.O.E., Udo J., Ajotade K.E. (1989). Fertilizer procurement and distribution: Fertilizer use and management practice for crops in Nigeria. Savenda Publishers, Nsukka, Nigeria, pp. 25-28.
  • [8] Fisher R.S., Palmer F.E. (1984). The physiology of field crop. John Willey and sons, New York, pp. 10-12.
  • [9] FAO (2008). World sesame situation. Available at http//:faostat.fao.org.
  • [10] [Groote H.M. (2002). Identifying farmers preference for new maize varieties in eastern Africa. 1st edition, CIMMYT Publishers, Nairobi, pp. 102.
  • [11] [Hiebsch C.K., McCollum R.C., Agronomy Journal 79 (1987) 15-23.
  • [12] Ijoyah M.O., Iorlamen T., Fanen F.T., International Journal of Natural Sciences 18 (2014) 36-46.
  • [13] Ijoyah M.O., Jimba J., Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 2(2) (2012) 38-44.
  • [14] Iken J.E., Amusa N.A., African Journal of Biotechnology 3 (2004) 302-307.
  • [15] Kulter F., Harrison H.C., Stand J.E., Horticultural Science 36(2) (2001) 274-278.
  • [16] McGilchrist I.A., Biomet. Journal 21 (1971) 975-985.
  • [17] Muoneke C.O., Asiegbu J.E., Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 179 (1997) 201-207.
  • [18] Odugbemi T. (2006). Outline and pictures of medicinal plants from Nigeria. University of Lagos Press, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria, pp. 283.
  • [19] Ofori F., Stern W.R., Field Crops Resources 14 (1986) 247-261.
  • [20] Ogindo H.O., Walker S., Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 30(11) (2005) 799-808.
  • [21] Olowe D.A., Emola K.I.T., Olowe R.A., Olayemi, A.B. (2007). Antimicrobial susceptibility and beta-lactamase detection of MRSA in Osogbo, S.W. Nigeria.
  • [22] Olufajo O.O., Tropical Oil Seeds Journal 1 (1992) 27-33.
  • [23] Onwueme I.C., Sinha T.D. (1995). Field crop production in tropical Africa. C.T.A. Ede. The Netherlands. 480 pp.
  • [24] Ozer H., Journal of Plant, Soil Environment 49(9) (2003) 422-426.
  • [25] Steel R.G.D., Torrie J.H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach, 2nd edition, McGraw Hill, New York, USA, 633 pp.
  • [26] Suleiman A.A. (2005). Genetic and inter-relationships among agronomic character in roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Kordofan, Sudan.
  • [27] Uzozie P.R., Journal of Agricultural Science 12 (2001) 18-21.
  • [28] Weiss E.A. (2006). Oil seed crops. 1st edition, Oxford Blackswell Science, U.K. pp. 20-23.
  • [29] Willey R.W., Expl. Agric. 21 (1985) 119-133.
  • [30] Willey R.W., Rao M.R., Expl. Agric. 16 (1980) 117-125.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-d870e2a4-f0db-45a5-90b0-180fb7e40c50
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.