Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 36 | 109-126
Article title

Combining Communicative-Analytic and Experiential Approaches in Teaching Pre-Intermediate Level of General English to Adults at Commercial Language Schools and Centers

Title variants
Languages of publication
In the conditions of today’s expansion of English as the global language of international communication, more and more adults who earlier completed their secondary or even higher education start learning it anew at commercial language schools and centers the world over. However, the pedagogy and methodology of teaching and learning at such schools and centers have not been developed yet. The present article is an attempt of solving some theoretical and practical issues of organizing such teaching and learning using as an example a pre-intermediate level course of English developed by the author for his commercial language center in Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine. The way of teaching and learning suggested in the article was developed to meet learners’ expectations and, at the same time, to be in full accordance with the latest achievements in organizing adult students’ efficient language acquisition. The developed approach was called the communicative-analytic one since, on the one hand, it makes use of the best in communicative language learning for attainment of the final goal of language education for adults – developing their English communicative competence. On the other hand, the communicative approach is combined with learners’ analysis, practicing, and consciousness-raising as to separate language forms that students believe to be indispensable for language acquisition. The fundamental feature of the course is the combination in the learning process of the developed communicative-analytic approach with the highest level of communicative language teaching – the experiential approach used for achieving the optimum learning outcomes in communicative skills acquisition. The paper discusses the learning activities characterizing both approaches and gives practical examples of such activities. The developed course is structured so as to teach both written and oral communication in English in parallel and in an integrated manner, and instances of such teaching are also given.
Physical description
  • Department of Applied Linguistics and Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages, Alfred Nobel University, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
  • [1] D. Graddol, “English Next. Why Global English May Mean the End of ‘English as a Foreign Language’”, British Council, 2006.
  • [2] O. Tarnopolsky, “EFL teaching in the Ukraine: State-regulated or commercial?”, TESOL Quarterly, vol. 30 (1996) 616-622.
  • [3] O. Tarnopolsky, “Teaching English Intensively in a Non-English Speaking Country: Theory, Practice, and Results”, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 428 579, 1999.
  • [4] O. Tarnopolsky, “Writing English as a foreign language: A report from Ukraine”, Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, No. 3 (2000) 209-226.
  • [5] Council of Europe, “Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment”, Strasbourg, 2001.
  • [6] R. Oxford “Integrated skills in the ESL/EFL classroom”, ERIC Digest, EDO-FL-01-05, http://www/, 2001.
  • [7] C.B. Paulston, “Linguistic and Communicative Competence: Topics in ESL”, Multilingual Matters, 1992.
  • [8] D. Nunan, “The Learner Centred Curriculum: A Study in the Second Language Learning”, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • [9] J.M. Green, “Student attitudes toward communicative and non-communicative activities: Do enjoyment and effectiveness go together?”, The Modern Language Journal, 77 (1993) 1-10.
  • [10] O. Tarnopolsky, “Communicative-analytic method in teaching English to adults at commercial language schools and centers in Ukraine”, International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, Vol. 65 (2015) 16-26,
  • [11] P. Kerr, “Straightforward Pre-Intermediate. Student’s Book. Second Edition”, Macmillan, 2012.
  • [12] W.E. Rutherford, “Second Language Grammar. Learning and Teaching”, Longman, 1987.
  • [13] W.E. Rutherford, M.S. Smith, “Consciousness-raising and the universal grammar”, Applied Linguistics, Vol. 6, No. 3 (1985) 274-282.
  • [14] Y. Cerdà, Y., S. Williams, “Doing the product: an experiential task-based approach to inspire learners”, In T. Pattison (Ed.). IATEFL 2012. Brighton Conference Selections, IATEFL (2012) 99-101.
  • [15] D.E. Freeman, Y.S. Freeman, “Between Worlds. Access to Second Language Acquisition”, Heinemann, 1994.
  • [16] M. Jerald, R.C. Clark, “Experiential Language Teaching Techniques. Out-of-Class Language Acquisition and Cultural Awareness Activities. Resource Handbook Number 3. Second revised edition”, Prolingua Associates, 1994.
  • [17] D. Kolb, “Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development”, Prentice Hall, 1984.
  • [18] O. Tarnopolsky, “Constructivist Blended Learning Approach to Teaching English for Specific Purposes”, Versita, 2012.
  • [19] J. Dewey, “Experience and Education”, Collier, 1938.
  • [20] O. Tarnopolsky, Y. Degtyariova, (2007). “EFL student as EFL teacher: Learning and motivational aspect”, IATEFL Voices, Issue 196 (2007) 10.
  • [21] A. Toechterle, “How about them teaching us?”, In T. Pattison (Ed.). IATEFL 2012. Brighton Conference Selections, IATEFL (2012) 70-71.
  • [22] M. Jones, P. Kerr, “Straightforward Pre-Intermediate Workbook”, Macmillan, 2005.
  • [23] D.L. Fried-Booth, “Project Work”, Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • [24] T. Hutchinson, “Project English. Student's Book”, Oxford University Press, 1994.
  • [25] P. Sharma, B. Barrett, “Blended Learning. Using Technology in and beyond the Language Classroom”, Macmillan, 2007.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.