Dlaczego w biologii tak trudno być „rewolucjonistą”?

• Authors: Agnieszka Proszewska , Adrian Stencel
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

Understanding how science is created and developed is a very complex problem. Many claim that once in a while the science goes through periods of so-called “revo-lutions” – diametric changes in the perception of the reality, that change the way we see the world. Such a vision of the development of knowledge is particularly evident in the history of physics. Do similar breakthroughs take place in other sciences, such as biology or chemistry, as well? Our main objective is to demonstrate that the scien-tific revolutions in biology can have a specific, local, character and concern only some particular branches of biology. This hypothesis will be discussed by analyzing the impact of microbiomics on the concept of the organism.

Keywords

EN

microbiomics; philosophy of biology; philosophy of science; scientific revolutions

Discipline

• BIOLOGY: BIOLOGY

• Publisher: Towarzystwo Doktorantów. Uniwersytet Jagielloński
• Journal: Zeszyty Naukowe Towarzystwa Doktorantów Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Nauki Ścisłe
• Year: 2017
• Issue: 15
• Pages: 7-14

Contributors

author

Agnieszka Proszewska

• Wydziału Fizyki, Astronomii i Informatyki Stosowanej, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

author

Adrian Stencel

• Wydział Filozoficzny, Uniwersytet Jagielloński

References

• 1. Clarke L., The Problem of Biological Individuality, “Biological Theory” 2010, No. 5 (4),
• s. 312–325.
• 2. Clarke G. et al., Minireview: Gut microbiota: the neglected endocrine organ, “Molecular
• Endocrinology” 2014, No. 28 (8), s. 1221–1238.
• 3. Godfrey-Smith P., Is it a Revolution?, “Biology and Philosophy” 2007, No. 22, s. 429–437.
• 4. Kuhn T., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago 1962.
• 5. Pepper J., Herron M., Does Biology Need an Organism Concept?, “Biological Reviews”
• 2008, No. 83 (4), s. 621–627.
• 6. Mazmanian L. et al., An Immunomodulatory Molecule of Symbiotic Bacteria Directs Maturation
• of the Host Immune System, “Cell” 2005, No. 122 (1), s. 107–118.
• 7. McFall-Ngai M. et al., Animals in a Bacterial World, a New Imperative for the Life Sciences,
• “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America”
• 2013, No. 110 (9), s. 3229–3236.
• 8. Slack J., Essential Developmental Biology (2nd ed.), Oxford 2005.
• 9. Stencel A., Proszewska A., How Research on Microbiomes Is Changing Biology: A Discussion
• on the Concept of the Organism, Foundations of Science, Springer Netherlands
• 2017, [online] https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10699-017-9543-x.pdf
• 10. Stencel A., Proszewska A., W poszukiwaniu uniwersalnej koncepcji organizmu. Problem
• indywidualizacji, „Filozofia Nauki” 2017, nr 4 (100), s. 115–128.
• 11. Sleator R., The Human Superorganism – Of Microbes and Men, “Medical Hypotheses”
• 2010, No. 74 (2), s. 214–215.
• 12. Queller D., Strasmann J., Beyond Society: the Evolution of Organismality, “Philosophical
• Transactions of the Royal Society B” 2009, B364, s. 3143–3155.
• 13. Wilkins A. S., Are There Kuhnian Revolutions in Biology?, “Bioessays” 1996, No. 18, s. 695–696

• Document Type: article