PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2017 | 89 | 175-183
Article title

Implementing the innovation by academies in Poland. Condition and perspectives

Authors
Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Implementation of innovation by various business units is currently a natural phenomenon demonstrating the company’s development with means of new products, models or management methods. The ‘innovation’ word also began own operation in the area of academies. Innovations are inscribed in the academy’s development, because in such a place the researches on new products or processes are conducted, because researches are the university’s goal. It is nothing new for an academy, but currently the ‘innovation’ word is outspoken louder in the academies and began to work in various forms. Polish academies currently experience a sort of commercialisation learning process, leading to the researches and implementation of innovations, not only in own area, but generally for the external market. Economy and society should exploit the academic resources in broad extent, not only with means of a qualified personnel, but also with means of the resources in the academy’s disposition. The academies are currently becoming a business partner, and scientists become a sort of “businessmen” who sell own products. According to the statistical data, Polish academies occupy last places in worldwide rankings with respect to i.e. the innovations. It is interesting, because scientific employees are highly evaluated in other scientific centres located abroad.
Year
Volume
89
Pages
175-183
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin, Poland
References
  • [1] Alves A., Carneiro L., Madureira R., Patricio R. (2007). High performance collaborative networks: a realistic innovation or just an academic desire? in: Towards new challenges for innovative management practices, Erima Publication, Vol. II, 3-5.
  • [2] Aubier C., BaryR., Guidat C. (2007). Cultural vision on personal competencies in innovation: a firs case of a measured differences between the SME’s needs and formulations in France, Spain, Germany and Sweden, Towards new challenges for innovative management practices, Erima Publication, Vol. II, 3-5.
  • [3] Brennan J., Lyon E., S., Schomburg H., Teichler U. (1994). The Experiences and Views of Graduates. Messages from Recent Sun/eys, Higher Education Management, Vol. 6(3), 275-304
  • [4] Brennan J., Kogan M., Teichler U. (1995). Higher education and work, London.
  • [5] Cohen W. M, Levinthal D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35(1),
  • [6] Desmarez P., Thys-Clement F. (1994). Universities, Students and Employment-Present Position and Prospects, Higher Education Management, Vol. 6(3), p. 259-273.
  • [7] Drozodowski R., Zakrzewska A., Puchalska K., Morchat M., Mroczkowska D. (2010), Promoting pro-innovation attitudes by strengthening the creativity of the individual, Editor: Polish Agency for Enterprise Development, Warsaw.
  • [8] Edler J., Georghiou L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side, Reseaech Policy, Vol. 36/ 7, pp. 949-963.
  • [9] Fuente G.de la (1995). Higher Education and Employment in Spain, European Journal of Education, Vol. 2(30), pp. 217-233.
  • [10] Gellert C. (1993). Higher Education in Europe, London.
  • [11] Hippel E. von (1994). Sticky information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implication, for Innovation, Management Science, Vol. 40, No 4, pp. 429-439.
  • [12] Johnstone S. (2005), Open Educational Resources and Open Content, Background Note, International Institute for Educational Planning, Interner Discussion Forum on Open Educational Resources, Open Content for Higher Education.
  • [13] Kivinen O., Ahola S., Kankaapaa A. (1995). Current and Future Demand for Graduates: problems of Comparatm Analysis, European Journal of Education, Vol. 2(30), p. 187-210.
  • [14] Klenow R., Rodrigues-Clare A., (1997). The Neoclassical Revival in Growth Economics: Has It Gone Too Far? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12.
  • [15] Kogan M., Brennan J. (1993). Higher Education and the World of Work: An Overview, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 18 (2), pp. 2-23.
  • [16] Kozma T. (1993). The Expansion of Education in Eastern Europe: A Regional View, Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 18(2), pp. 85-96.
  • [17] Maier K. (2010). Potential of industrial and university cooperation, in: Innovations in academic education Higher education in the process of change, University of Lodz Publishing House, Lodz, Poland
  • [18] Matusiak Krzysztof B. (2011). Innovations and Technology Transfer, Warsaw: Polish Agency for Enterprise Reconstruction.
  • [19] Mikos A. (2012). Building relationships between science and business as a determinant of the innovative model of higher education institutions, The Małopolska School of Economics in Tarnów Research Papers Collection Vol. 1 , No 20, pp. 113-124.
  • [20] North K., Friedrich P. (2007). A competence base view of innovation: interaction of innovative groups: Towards new challenges for innovative management practices, Erima Publication, Vol. II, 5-11.
  • [21] Report (2006). Barriers to Cooperation of Entrepreneurs and Scientific Centers, Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Department of Implementation and Innovation 2006
  • [22] Report (2008). Oslo Manual of Principles of Collection and Interpretation of Innovation Data. Third edition. OECD, Paris.
  • [23] Report (2009). Ernst & Young Business Advisory, Institute for Market Economics, Diagnosis of the state of higher education in Poland. Access: Institute for Market Economy.
  • [24] Report (2010). Strategy for the development of higher education in Poland until 2020 - second option, Ernst & Young Business Advisory, Institute for Market Economics, Warsaw 2010
  • [25] Rogers Everett M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, The Free Press, New York-London, Toronto, Sydney.
  • [26] Sawhney M, Wolcott R.C, Arroniz I. (2006), The 12 Different Ways for Companies to Innovate, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 47, No 3, pp.74-81.
  • [27] Schumpeter J.A. (1960). Theory of economic development. PWN Warsaw, Poland
  • [28] Szulczyńska U. (2005). The Role of Intellectual Capital in Innovative Activity in: Social Inequalities and Economic Growth. Human and intellectual capital, part. II. M. Woźniak. ed. Scientific writings of the Rzeszów University, Rzeszów, pp. 233-242.
  • [29] Teichler U. (1995). Higher Education and New Socio-Economic Challenges, in: OECD (ed.): Seminar IV: Proffesional and Social Competence , Paris: Centre for Cooperation with the economies in Transition.
  • [30] Teichler U. (1991). Towards a Highly Educated Society, Higher Education Policy, Vol. 4(4), pp. 11-20.
  • [31] Wawak T. (2010). Restructuring of management in higher education in a knowledge society - in the context of globalization and the new economy, in: Fundamental problems of contemporary technologies, Ternopil National Technical University, Ukraine-Ternopil, pp. 443-445.
  • [32] Wissema J G. (2005). Technostarter - why and how?, PARP Warsaw, Poland
  • [33] Wroczyńska A. (2013). Expectations of contemporary students towards higher education institutions - presentation of research results, BAS studies No. 3 (35), pp. 254-255
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-c6029479-f42c-49fb-82bc-57b1cd6d6be5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.