Class Oppression and Commodification in Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Merchant of Venice
Languages of publication
Karl Heinrich Marx tended to focus on considering how class struggle, oppressive ideologies, and social inequality are portrayed in literary texts throughout history in order to find a definite structural cause behind the modern exploitative capitalist system. One of these historical literary texts that attracted Marx’s attention was William Shakespeare’s to which he referred a lot. This paper intends to analyze Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Merchant of Venice in the light of Marxism to expose the upper classes’ oppressive behavior, their unethical victimization, exploitation, and commodification of the lower classes. Consequently, through a Marxist reading of Shakespeare’s plays, one can perceive that there are vivid links between Marxist and Shakespearean thinking, especially the similarities of thought held by each on the subjects of class oppression and commodification. Shakespeare portrayed the bitter social facts which Marxist thought tends to agree with.
-  Abrams, M.H. 2005. A Glossary of Literary Terms. Australia: Thomson.
-  Bloom, H., ed. 2010. Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations: William Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice. New York: Infobase Publishing.
-  Donaldson, E. T., David, A., Smith, H., Lewalski, B. K., Adams, R. M., and et al. 1987. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. London: Norton.
-  Eagleton, T. 2008. Literary Theory: An Introduction. United States: University of Minnesota Press.
-  Ferber, M. 1990. The Ideology of The Merchant of Venice. English Literary Renaissance, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp. 431-464.
-  Guerin, W. L., Labor, E., Morgan, L., Reesman, J. C., and Willingham, J. R. 2011. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.
-  Habib, M. A. R. 2005. A History of Literary Criticism and Theory: From Plato to the Present. USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
-  Hatlen, B. 1980. Fuedal and Bourgeois Concepts of Value in The Merchant of Venice. The Bucknell Review, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp. 91.
-  Lim, W. S. H. 2010. Surety and Spiritual Commercialism in The Merchant of Venice. SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp. 355-382.
-  Mahon, J. W., & Mahon, E. M. eds. 2002. The Merchant of Venice: New Critical Essays. New York: Routledge.
-  Marx, K. 1975. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Trans. M. Milligan, and D. J. Struik. Marx/Engels Collected Works. Vol. 3. New York: International Publishers.
-  Marx, K. 1987. The German Ideology. Trans. C. Dutt. Marx/Engels Collected Works. Vol. 5. New York: International Publishers.
-  Marx, K., and Friedrich, E. 2002. The Communist Manifesto. Trans. S. Moore. London: Penguin.
-  Muir, K. 1947. Timon of Athens and the Cash Nexus. Modern Quarterly Miscellany, Volume 1, pp. 57-76.
-  Ruccio, David F. 1988. The Merchant of Venice, or Marxism in the Mathematical Mode. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp. 36-68. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08935698808657827
-  Shakespeare, W. 1992. Hamlet. London: Wordsworth Classics.
-  Shakespeare, W. 1999. The Merchant of Venice. New York and London: Penguin Publishing.
-  Smith, C. 2012. Shakespeare's Influence on Marx, Freud and the Frankfurt School Critical Theorists. United Kingdom: University of Warwick.
-  Stallybrass, P. 2001. “Well grubbed, old mole”: Marx, Hamlet, and the (un)fixing of representation. In Marxist Shakespeare, ed. J. E. Howard and S. C. Shershow, 115-132. London: Routledge.
-  Tyson, L. 2006. Critical Theory Today, A User-Friendly Guide. London: Routledge.
-  Wells, S, ed. 1993. Shakespeare Survey. Vol. 45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Publication order reference