Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 3 | 2 | 140-144
Article title

Dobór miękkich soczewek kontaktowych u dzieci w wieku szkolnym

Title variants
Soft contact lenses fitting for school-aged children
Languages of publication
Już od najmłodszych lat oko dziecka dobrze toleruje soczewki kontaktowe. Według najważniejszych badań dzieci w wieku szkolnym potrafią zakładać i zdejmować soczewki bez pomocy rodziców oraz dbają o ich higienę i pielęgnację lepiej niż młodzi dorośli. Stosowanie korekcji soczewkowej może znacząco podnieść samoocenę dzieci, ponadto przyczynia się do zwiększenia aktywności ruchowej. Nie odnotowano również zwiększonego ryzyka powikłań ze strony powierzchni oka u młodych pacjentów. Sugeruje się, że przy zalecaniu tej formy korekcji silikonowo-hydrożelowe jednodniowe soczewki kontaktowe powinny być u dzieci metodą z wyboru.
Children’s eyes tolerate contact lenses at a very young age. According to the most important studies, school-aged children have no trouble applying or removing contact lenses without assistance from their parents and they follow instructions better than young adults. Wearing contact lenses can improve self-esteem and participation in activities. No increased risk of complications from the eye surface is showed. It is suggested that silicone-hydrogel daily disposable contact lenses should be a method of choice for children.
Physical description
  • Section of Ophthalmo-Pharmacology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna
  • 1. A survey of 1376 UK practitioners. Questions asked on the day and responses captured anonymously via voting keypads. JJVC “Be the best you can be” Roadshow, 2007.
  • 2. Sindt CW, Riley CM. Practioner attitudes on children and contact lenses. Optometry 2011; 82(1): 44-55.
  • 3. Sulley A. Fitting children with contact lenses. Optician 2009; 26-30.
  • 4. British Contact Lens Association Recommendations: Contact lenses for Children and Teens [ -lenses-for-children-and-teens] (dostęp 27.04.2016).
  • 5. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Rah MJ, et al. Contact Lenses in Pediatrics (CLIP) Study: chair time and ocular health. Optom Vis Sci 2007; 84(9): 896-902.
  • 6. Jones LA, Walline JJ, Gaume A, et al. Purchase of contact lenses and contact-lenses-related symptoms following the Contact Lenses in Pediatrics (CLIP) Study. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2009; 32(4): 157-163.
  • 7. Walline JJ, Gaume A, Jones LA, et al. Benefits of contact lens wear for children and teens. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 317-321.
  • 8. Li L, Moody K, Tan DT, et al. Contact lenses in pediatrics study in Singapore. Eye Contact Lens 2009; 35(4): 188-195.
  • 9. Walline JJ, Long S, Zadnik K. Daily disposable contact lens wear in myopic children. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81(4): 255-259.
  • 10. Rah MJ, Walline JJ, Jones-Jordan LA, et al. Vision specific quality of life of pediatric contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2010; 87(8): 560-566.
  • 11. Walline J, Jones LA, Sinnot L, et al. Randomised trial of the effect of contact lens wear on self-preception in children. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 222-232.
  • 12. Celorio JM, Pruett RC. Prevalence of lattice degeneration and its relation to axial length in severe myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1991; 111(1): 20-23.
  • 13. Chua WH, Balakrishnan V, Chan YH, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia. Ophthalmology 2006; 113(12): 2285-2291.
  • 14. Charm J, Cho P. High Myopia-Partial Reduction Ortho-K: A 2-Year Randomized Study. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 530-539.
  • 15. Chen C, Cheung SW, Cho P. Myopia control using toric orthokeratology (TO-SEE study). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 6510-6517.
  • 16. Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of Myopia in Orthokeratology (ROMIO) Study: A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 7077-7085.
  • 17. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Villa-Collar C, Gilmartin B, et al. Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Contact Lenses in Spain (MCOS): Refractive and Biometric Changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53(8): 5060-5065.
  • 18. Katz J, Schein OD, Levy B, et al. A randomized trial of rigid gas permeable contact lenses to reduce progression of children’s myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136(1): 82-90.
  • 19. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopia progression. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1181-1185.
  • 20. Anstice NS, Phillips JR. Effect of dual-focus soft contact lens wear on axial myopia progression in children. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 1152-1161.
  • 21. Lam CS, Tang WC, Tse DY, et al. Defocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lens slows myopia progression in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren: a 2-year randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 40-45.
  • 22. Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Smith E, 3rd, et al. Decrease in rate of myopia progression with a contact lens designed to reduce relative peripheral hyperopia: one-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 9362-9367.
  • 23. Walline JJ, Greiner KL, McVey ME, et al. Multifocal contact lens myopia control. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90: 1207-1214.
  • 24. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott L, et al. A randomized trial of the effect of soft contact lenses on myopia progression in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49(11): 4702-4706.
  • 25. Horner DG, Soni PS, Salmon TO, Swartz TS. Myopia progression in adolescent wearers of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76(7): 474-479.
  • 26. Andreo LK. Long-term effects of hydrophilic contact lenses on myopia. Ann Ophthalmol 1990; 22(6): 224-229.
  • 27. Fonn D, MacDonald KE, Richter D, Pritchard N. The ocular response to extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp Optom 2002; 85(3): 176-182.
  • 28. Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D. Changes in myopic refractive error with nine months’ extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76(12): 845-849.
  • 29. Bergenske P, Long B, Dillehay S, et al. Long-term clinical results: 3 years of up to 30-night continuous wear of lotrafilcon A silicone hydrogel and daily wear of low-Dk/t hydrogel lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2007; 33: 74-80.
  • 30. Blacker A, Mitchell GL, Bullimore MA, et al. Myopia progression during three years of soft contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86: 1150-1153.
  • 31. Fulk GW, Cyert LA, Parker DE, et al. The effect of changing from glasses to soft contact lenses on myopia progression in adolescents. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2003; 23: 71-77.
  • 32. Marsh-Tootle WL, Dong LM, Hyman L, et al. Myopia progression in children wearing spectacles vs. switching to contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2009; 86(6): 741-747.
  • 33. Bullimore MA, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, et al. A retrospective study of myopia progression in adult contact lens wearers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43: 2110-2113.
  • 34. Walline J, Emch AJ, Laul A, et al. Comparison of Contact Lens Wearers Fitted as Children Vs Teenagers. BCLA Poster Presentation 2011.
  • 35. Walline J, Emch AJ, Laul A, et al. Comparison of Success in Contact Lens Wearers Fitted as Children vs Teenagers Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011 ARVO E-abstract 6499.
  • 36. Chalmers RL, Wagner H, Mitchell GL, et al. Age and other risk factors for corneal infiltrative and inflammatory events in young soft contact lens wearers from the Contact Lens Assessment in Youth (CLAY) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52(9): 6690-6696.
  • 37. Wagner H, Chalmers RL, Mitchell GL, et al. Risk factors for interruption to soft contact lens wear in children and young adults. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88(8): 973-980.
  • 38. Wagner H, Richdale K, Mitchell GL, et al. Age, behavior, environment, and health factors in the soft contact lens risk survey. Optom Vis Sci 2014; 91(3): 252-261.
  • 39. Soni PS, Horner DG, Jimenez L, et al. Will young children comply and follow instructions to successfully wear soft contact lenses? CLAO J 1995; 21(2): 86-92.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.