PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2013 | 18 | 4 | 469-485
Article title

Stereotypes inhibition in syllogistic reasoning. Changes related to age and time measurement repetition during study

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The aim of this study was to verify the hypothesis saying that older people on average achieve a lower level of performance than younger at solving syllogisms which contain stereotypical knowledge about aging, and to decide whether the nature of the changes taking place during the test (under the influence of exercise) corresponds to a greater extent to the assumptions of the disuse hypothesis (greater gradient of improvement in elderly subjects), or to the assumptions about age-related decline of developmental plasticity (gradient greater of improvement in the young). Generalizing the empirical findings, we can say that, compared with younger people a slowdown in the syllogistic reasoning does not characterize cognitive functioning of people in late adulthood. They can solve syllogisms just as quickly as younger subjects. However, they respond more slowly when the tasks are subject to stereotypical content and less accurately when the conclusions of syllogisms are false. The analysis of differences and patterns of changes in the speed and correctness of responses during the test of syllogistic reasoning in the age groups leads to ambiguous statements about the expected influence of the age of life in the improvement of performance of tasks under the influence of measurement repetition (practice). We came to the conclusion that in the search for a model of study, which separates from each other the effects of age (macro-developmental changes) and repetition of measurements during the test (micro-developmental changes) probably more useful is a flowchart of tasks’ exposure and comparison of the changes/differences related to age and measurement time. Thus, such studies require an increase of the number of measurements/tasks during the test.
Year
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
469-485
Physical description
References
  • Aron, A.R., Poldrack, R.A. (2005). The Cognitive Neuroscience of Response Inhibition: Relevance for Genetic Research in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 11, 1285-1292, doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.026.
  • Asheley, V., Swick, D. (2010). Consequences of emotional stimuli: Age differences on pure and mixed blocks of the emotional Stroop. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5, 14, doi: 101186/1744-9081-5-14.
  • Baltes, P.B. (1987). Theoretical Propositions of Life-Span Developmental Psychology: On the Dynamics Between Growth and Decline. Developmental Psychology, 23 (5), 611-626.
  • Baltes, P.B. (1997). On the Incomplete Architecture of Human Ontogeny: Selection, Optimization, and Compensation as Foundation of Developmental Theory, American Psychologist, 52, 4, 366-380.
  • Baltes, P.B. Kliegl, R. (1992). Further testing of limits of cognitive plasticity: Negative age differences in a mnemonic skill are robust. Developmental Psychology, 28 (1), 121-125.
  • Baltes, P.B., Reese, H.W., Nesselroade, J.R. (1977). Life-span developmental psychology. Introduction to research methods. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
  • Bara, B.G., Bucciarelli, M., Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1995). Development of syllogistic reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 2, 157-193.
  • Brehmer, Y., Li, S.-C., Müller, V., von Oertzen, T., Linderberger, U. (2007). Memory plasticity across the life span: Uncovering children’s latent potential. Developmental Psychology, 43 (2), 465-478.
  • Charnees, N. (1985). Aging and problem-solving performance. W: N. Charnees (red.), Aging and human performance (s. 225-259). Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Davidson, D.J., Zaks, R.T., Williams, C.C. (2003). Stroop interference. Practice, and aging. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10 (2), 85-98.
  • De Neys, W. (2006). Dual processing in reasoning. Two systems but one reasoned. Psychological Science, 17, 5, 428- 433.
  • De Neys, W., van Gelder, E. (2009). Logic and belief accross the lifespan: the rice and fall of belief inhibition during syllogistic reasoning. Developmental Science, 16 (6), 986-993, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00746.x.
  • De Neys, W.,Vanderputte, K. (2011). When less is not always more: Stereotype knowledge and reasoning development. Developmental Psychology, 47 (2), 432-441.
  • Elliott, R., Rees, G., Dolan, R.J. (1999). Ventromedial prefrontal cortex mediates guessing. Neuropsychologia, 37, 403-411.
  • Engle, R.W., Sedek, G., von Hecker, U., McIntosh, D.N. (red.) (2005). Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopatology. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720413.
  • Evans, J.St.B.T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.
  • Gilinsky, A.S., Judd, B.B. (1994). Working memory and bias in reasoning across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 98, 3, 356-371.
  • Goel, V., Buchel, C., Frith, C., Dolan, R.J. (2000). Dissociation of mechanisms underlying syllogistic reasoning. NeuroImage, 12 (5), 504-514.
  • Goel, V., Dolan, R.J. (2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition, 87, 11-22.
  • Hertzog, C., Cooper, B.P., Fisk, A.D. (1996). Aging and individual differences in the development of skilled memory search performance. Psychology and Aging, 11 (3), 497-520.
  • Hertzog, C., Kramer, A.F., Wilson, R.S., Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9 (1), 1-65.
  • Hofer, S.M., Alwin, D.F. (red.) (2008). Handbook of Cognitive Aging. Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Houde, O., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Moutier, S., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B., Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2000). Shifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: the neural impact of cognitive inhibition training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (5), 721-728.
  • Kliegl, R., Smith, J., Baltes, P.B. (1989). Testing-the-limits and the study of adult age differences in cognitive plasticity of a mnemonic skill. Developmental Psychology, 25 (2), 247-256.
  • Kliegl, R., Smith, J., Baltes, P.B. (1990). On the locus and process of magnification of age differences during mnemonic training. Developmental Psychology, 26 (6), 894-904.
  • Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H., Greenlee, M. (2002). Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: a functional MRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 203-212.
  • Lamson, W.N., Rogers, W.A. (2008). Assessing age-related patterns in strategy selection on mathematical problem solving task. Journal of Gerontology, 63, 3, 389-433.
  • Meyer, D.E., Irwin, D.E., Osman, A.M., Koniuos, J. (1988). The Dynamics of Cognition and Action. Mental Processes Inferred from Speed-Accuracy Decomposition. Psychological Review, 95, 2, 183-237.
  • Overton, W.F., Ricco, R.B. (2010). Dual systems and the development of reasoning: competence-procedural systems. WIREs Cognitive Sciences, doi: 10.1002/ wcs.120.
  • Salthouse, T.A. (1992). Mechanisms of age-cognition relations in adulthood. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Salthouse, T.A. (1994). Age-related Changes in Basic Cognitive Processes. W: M. Storandt, G.R. VandenBos (red.), The Adult Years: Continuity and Change (s. 5-40). Wshington: American Psychological Association.
  • Salthouse, T.A. (2011). Effects of age on time-dependent cognitive change. Psychological Science, 22 (5), 682-688.
  • Schaie, K.W. (1965). A general model for study of developmental problems. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 133-141.
  • Stine-Morrow, E.A.L., Basak, C. (2011). Cognitive Interventions. W: K.W. Schaie, S.L. Willis (red.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. 7th Edition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Stuart-Hamilton, I. (2006). The psychology of ageing: An introduction. 4th Edition. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  • Szymura, B., Słabosz, A. (2002). Uwaga selektywna a pozytywne i negatywne konsekwencje automatyzacji czynności. Studia Psychologiczne, 40, 161-183.
  • Trempała, J. (1989). Rozwój poznawczy w dorosłości. Przegląd Psychologiczny, XXIX, 1, 9-23.
  • Trempała, J. (2011). Natura rozwoju psychicznego. W: J. Trempała (red.), Psychologia rozwoju człowieka (s. 28-49). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  • Trempała, J., Zając-Lamparska, L. (2007). Postawy wobec osób starszych: różnice międzypokoleniowe. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 50, 4, 447-462.
  • Zając-Lamparska, L. (2008a). Postawy utajone wobec osób starszych, przejawiane w trzech grupach wiekowych: wczesnej, średniej i późnej dorosłości. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 13, 3, 91-102.
  • Zając-Lamparska, L. (2008b). Współczesny obraz człowieka starszego wśród młodych dorosłych. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 13, 2, 124-140.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-b4251608-916e-4b6c-9776-32f1af5c8cbb
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.