PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2019 | 120 | 2 | 81-110
Article title

Ant Faunal Diversity of Bibhutibhushan Wildlife Sanctuary, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The present study unfolds the diversity of ants of Bibhutibhushan Wildlife Sanctuary, North 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India. A total of 22 species under 13 genera distributed over 5 subfamilies could be recorded. These include three newly recorded species namely Leisiota frauenfeldi (Mayr) (Formicinae), Crematogaster (Acrocoelia) hodgsoni Forel (Myrmicinae) and Brachyponera nigrita Emery (Ponerinae) from the state and nearly 90.5% of the reported species are new for the district (marked*). Analysis of their zoogeographical distribution reveals that the fauna apart from being Oriental also includes some Palaearctic (72.73%), Australian (13.63%) and Ethiopian (4.54%) elements. The dominant functional group is constituted by the Subordinate Camponotini (36.37%) followed by Generalized Myrmicinae (22.73%), Tropical Climate Specialist (13.63%), Specialist Predator (9.09%), Opportunist (9.09%) and Dominant Dolichorinae (9.09%). Ants are mostly prevalent during Monsoon (81.82%), followed by Postmonsoon (68.18%) and Premonsoon (50.00%). Two species namely Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) compressus (Fabricius) and Oecophylla smaragdina (Fabricius) are recorded throughout the year. Ranking sequence of the most abundant species in descending order is: Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) compressus (15.01%) = Oecophylla smaragdina (15.01%) > Crematogaster (Acrocoelia) hodgsoni (12.91%). Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) compressus and Oecophylla smaragdina are the most dominant species. Data also reveals that both core and buffer zones conjointly offer a better combination of habitat requirement, as 12 species are common in both the zones. Highest no. of species are recorded from leaf litter and ground combined together (22 species) and 6 species are arboreal in nature. Shannon’s Diversity Index (α diversity) and Simpson’s Diversity Index both are higher in buffer zone. This reflects the habitat exploitation efficiency of the encountered species. As per Jaccard Index (β diversity) the similarity value of both the zones is only 0.55.
Discipline
Year
Volume
120
Issue
2
Pages
81-110
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Post Graduate Department of Zoology, Barasat Government College, 10, K.N.C. Road, Barasat, Kolkata – 7000124, India
author
  • Post Graduate Department of Zoology, Barasat Government College, 10, K.N.C. Road, Barasat, Kolkata – 7000124, India
  • IRDM Faculty Centre, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University, Narendrapur, Kolkata – 700103, India
References
  • [1] Agosti, D. & Johnson, N. F. 2003. Fernández, F., ed. La nueva taxonomía de ormigas. Introducción a las hormigas de la región neotropical. Instituto Humboldt, Bogotá. pp. 45–48. Retrieved 2015-12-13.
  • [2] Anonymous, 2017. Antwiki. Online @ http://www.antwiki.org/wiki (accessed on 30.12.2018).
  • [3] Bharti, H., Guenard, B. Bharti, M. & Economo, E.P. 2016. An updated checklist of the ants of India with their specific distributions in Indian states (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys, 551: 1-83.
  • [4] Bharti, H. Sharma, Y., Bharti, M. & Pfeiffer, M. 2013. Ant species richness, endemicity and functional groups, along an elevational gradient in the Himalayas. Asian Myrmecology, 5: 79-101.
  • [5] Bhattacharjee, S. 2009. Vespoidea (Hymenoptera) of Jaldapara Wildlife Sanctuary. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of Calcutta, 294pp.
  • [6] Bhattacharjee, S. 2017. Study of Ant Faunal Diversity of Chintamoni Kar Bird Sanctuary, West Bengal, India. Biodiversity: Exploration, Exploitation, Conservation and Management - Vision and Mission. Proceedings of the UGC Sponsored National Seminar, Kolkata, India, 19-20th November, 2016 (Eds. Saha et al.). World Scientific News, 71: 56-58.
  • [7] Bingham, C.T. 1903. Ants and Cuckoo Wasps. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera II. London: 1-506.
  • [8] Castro, G.H.P., Kayano. D.Y., Souza, R.F., Hilsdorf, A.W.S., Feitosa, R.M. & Morini, M.S.C. 2017. Seasonal Patterns of the Foraging Ecology of Myrmelachista arthuri Forel, 1903 (Formicidae: Formicinae). Sociobiology, 64(3): 237-243.
  • [9] Chapman, J.W. & Capco, S.R. 1951. Checklist of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Asia. Monogr. Ins. Sci. Tech., Manila, 1: 1-327, 1 map.
  • [10] Cousens, T. 2010. Composition and functional groups of ants at the Fiona Stanley Hospital and Beeliar Regional Park, Western Australia: Report for the Fiona Stanley Hospital Project. Murdoch University, Western Australia.
  • [11] Datta, S.K. 1988. Studies on the Aphid tending Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of some parts of North east India. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Zoology, Univ. of Calcutta, 335 pp.
  • [12] García-Martínez, M.A., Martínez-Tlapa, D.L., PérezToledo, G.R., Quiroz-Robledo, L.N., Castaño-Meneses, G., Laborde, J. & Valenzuela-González J.E. 2015. Taxonomic, species and functional group diversity of ants in a tropical anthropogenic landscape. Mongabay.com Open Access Journal - Tropical Conservation Science, 8 (4): 1017-1032.
  • [13] Ghosh, S.N. & Sheela, S. 2008. On a collection of Formicidae (Hymenoptera: Vespoidea) from Buxa Tiger Reserve, West Bengal, India, with new records of one rare genus and a rare species. Asian Myrmecology, 2: 99-102.
  • [14] Ghosh, S.N., Sheela, S. and Kundu, B.G. 2005. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Rabindra Sarovar, Kolkata. Rec. zool Surv. India, Occasional Paper No. 234: 1-40 (Publ. Director, Zool. Surv. India, Kolkata).
  • [15] Hernández-Ruiz, P., Castaño-Meneses, G. & Cano-Santana, Z. Composition and functional groups of epiedaphic ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in irrigated agroecosystem and in nonagricultural areas. 2009. Pesq. agropec. bras, Brasília, v. 44(8): 904-910
  • [16] Hymenoptera name server. Formicidae species count. Ohio State University.2017. http://atbi.biosci.ohiostate.edu/hymenoptera/tsa.sppcount?the_taxon=Formicidae (accessed on 30.12.2018).
  • [17] Karmaly, K.A. & Narendran, T.C. 2006. Indian ants Genus Camponotus Mayr. Teresian Carmel Publ.: 1-166.
  • [18] King, J.R., Anderson. A.N. & Cutter, A.D. 1998. Ants as bioindicators of habitat disturbance: validation of the functional group model for Australia's humid tropics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7: 1627-1638.
  • [19] Mathew, R. 2000. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae, Fauna of Tripura. State Fauna Series 7. Zool. Surv. India, 3: 347-354.
  • [20] Peck, S.L., Mcquaid, B. & Campbell, C.L. 1998. Using Ant Species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as a Biological Indicator of Agroecosystem Condition. Environ. Entomol. 27(5): 1102-1110
  • [21] Raychaudhuri, D. and Saha, S. (Eds.) 2014. Atlas of Insects and Spiders of Buxa Tiger Reserve. Publ. West Bengal Biodiversity Board and Nature Books India, Kolkata: 357 pp.
  • [22] Tiwari, R.N., Kundu, B.G., Roychowdhury, S. & Ghosh, S.N. 1998. Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Fauna of West Bengal. State Fauna Series 3. Zool. Surv. India: 211-294.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-af408d38-f560-4b53-91d4-4202e77c288d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.