PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2018 | 99 | 169-180
Article title

Utilization and Effectiveness of Surgical Safety Checklist in European Region

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Year 2018 marks as the decade of introduction of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist into the world of modern surgery. Surgical safety checklist, a set of items vital within the perioperative patient’s safety checkup, easy to be performed in any of the operating theatres and under any circumstances, is proven to be an effective tool in fight against preventable adverse events in surgical care. The aim of our study was to present the results of implementation of the SSC to surgical wards in European Region -in terms of utilization and effectiveness. We analyzed substantial articles on implementation and challenges of surgical checklist in European centres from period 2008-2017. Within 308 articles of PubMED database, 8 substantial articles on utilization and effectiveness of SSC were identified and reviewed. 50% of research was performed in Central Europe. 75% of articles measured the effectiveness with one method, either documents/checklist evaluation or questionnaires among health care professionals. Presented research showed significant changes in patient safety, decrease in post-surgical complications and mortality rates. The utilization of the checklist did not reach the ideal 100% in all procedures, ranging between 55-95%, with maximum compliance of 80% of all items. Main challenges in completion and participation of professionals in the studies were lack of training and audit options, as well as limited financial resources towards ensuring patient safety in surgical wards. Despite 10 years of introduction to the surgical field, the data on utilization and effectiveness of SSC is still insufficient among countries of the European region. Potential ways of improvement, such as training, monitoring and financial resources could result in further reduction of complication rates and mortality.
Discipline
Publisher

Year
Volume
99
Pages
169-180
Physical description
Contributors
  • I Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lublin, Al. Raclawickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland
  • Pediatric Neurology Department, III Chair of Pediatrics, Medical University of Lublin, 6 Prof. A. Gebali Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
  • Chair and Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Medical University of Lublin, 6 Prof. A. Gebali Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
  • Pediatric Neurology Department, III Chair of Pediatrics, Medical University of Lublin, 6 Prof. A. Gebali Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
author
  • Pediatric Neurology Department, III Chair of Pediatrics, Medical University of Lublin, 6 Prof. A. Gebali Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
References
  • [1] Askitopoulou H, Vgontzas AN. The relevance of the Hippocratic Oath to the ethical and moral values of contemporary medicine. Part I: The Hippocratic Oath from antiquity to modern times. Eur Spine J. 2017 Oct 27. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5348-4.
  • [2] Parsa-Parsi RW. The Revised Declaration of Geneva: A Modern-Day Physician's Pledge. JAMA 2017 Nov 28; 318(20): 1971-1972.
  • [3] Manor J., Blum N, Lurie Y. No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: Ignaz Semmelweis and the Story of Puerperal Fever. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Aug; 37(8): 881-887
  • [4] Pitt D, Aubin JM. Joseph Lister: father of modern surgery. Can J Surg. (2012) Oct; 55(5): E8–E9.
  • [5] McDonnell G, Russell, A.D. Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews (1999) 12: 147–79.
  • [6] Panesar SS, Cleary K, Sheikh A, Donaldson L. The WHO checklist: a global tool to prevent errors in surgery. Patient Saf Surg. 2009 May 28; 3(1): 9. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-3-9.
  • [7] Mitchell PH. Defining patient safety and quality care. In: Patient and Safety: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. (2008) Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
  • [8] Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD. Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14: 269-76.
  • [9] Mahajan RP. The WHO surgical checklist. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun; 25(2): 161-8.
  • [10] Pugel AE, Simianu VV, Flum DR, Dellinger EP. Use of the Surgical Safety Checklist to Improve Communication and Reduce Complications. J Infect Public Health 2015 May-Jun; 8(3): 219–225.
  • [11] Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AHS et al. A Surgical Safety Checklist to Reduce Morbidity and Mortality in a Global Population. N Engl J Med (2009) 360: 491-9.
  • [12] De Vries EN, Dijkstra L, Smorenburg SM, Meijer PR, Boermeester MA. The Surgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist optimizes timing of antibiotic prophylaxis. Patient Saf Surg. (2010) 4: (6).
  • [13] De Vries EN, Prins HA, Crolla R, den Outer AJ, van Andel G. Effect of a Comprehensive Surgical Safety System on Patient Outcomes. N Engl J Med (2010) 363:1928-37
  • [14] Garcia-Paris J, Cohena-Jimenez M, Montano-Jimenez P, Cordoba-Fernandez A. Implementation of the WHO “Safe Surgery Saves Lives” checklist in a podiatric surgery unit in Spain: a single-center retrospective observational study. Patient Safety in Surgery (2015) 9: 29 DOI 10.1186/s13037-015-0075-4
  • [15] Borgmann H, Helbig S, Reiter MA, Husch T, Schilling D et al. Utilization of surgical safety checklists by urological surgeons in Germany: a nationwide prospective survey. Patient Saf Surg (2015) 9: 37
  • [16] McGinlay D, Moore D, Mironescu A. A prospective observational assessment of Surgical Safety Checklist use in Brasov Children’s Hospital, barriers to implementation and methods to improve compliance. Rom J Anaesth and Intensive Care (2015) 22(2), 111-121
  • [17] Cullati S, Licker MJ, Francis P, Degiorgi A, Bezzola P et al. Implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist in Switzerland and Perceptions of Its Benefits: Cross- Sectional Survey. PLOS ONE (2014), 9(7): e101915
  • [18] Haugen AS, Softeland E, Eide GE, Sevdalis N, Vincent CA et al. Impact of the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist on safety culture in the operating theatre: a controlled intervention study. Br J Anaesth (2013) 110 (5): 807-815
  • [19] Mascherek AC, Schwappach DLB, Bezzola P Frequency of use and knowledge of the WHO Surgical checklist in Swiss hospitals: a cross-sectional online survey. Patient Saf Surg (2013) 7(36)
  • [20] Sendlhofer G, Mosbacher N, Karina L, Kober B, Jantscher L et al. Implementation of a Surgical Safety Checklist: Interventions to Optimize the Process and Hints to Increase Compliance PLOS ONE (2015) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0116926
  • [21] Sendlhofer G, Lumenta DB, Leitheb K, Kober B, Jantscher L et al. The Gap between Individual Perception and Compliance: A Qualitative Follow-Up Study of the Surgical Safety Checklist Application. PLOS ONE (2016) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149212
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-add50c5f-5881-4b3b-b188-526bd895e545
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.