Why do we talk to the patient? - challenging medical consultation from the point of view of modern philosophy

• Authors: Thomas BOHRER , Michael SCHMIDT , Johannes KOENIGSHAUSEN
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The medical consultation - the basis for the physician-patient relationship - is often nothing more than a brief medical history interview and receives no sufficient attention: Thus, the focus today is on providing brief information and obtaining the patient’s consent. In this paper we search for an independent approach to assessing the significance of the consultation for physicians. Today, philosophy recognizes two major approaches: modern anthropology as the science of human beings and media theory. If a physician does not “embed” the information, i.e. if he does not give it a meaning through transferring it onto the patient’s specific situation, the physician consequently treats the person like a veterinarian would, that is only focusing on the biological organism and irrespective of his characteristic view of the world. Thus, and provided that it is a therapeutical and conciliatory conversation, the consultation must primarily be “tailored to the addressee”. The information, the theoretical, purely topical content must be integrated into the patient’s actual life situation. This is of fundamental importance for patients safety.

Keywords

EN

"Medical consultation"; "media theory"; "modern anthropology"; "philosophy in medicine"

Discipline

• PSYCHOLOGY: PSYCHOLOGY

• Publisher: ZOZ Ośrodek UMEA SHINODA-KURACEJO
• Journal: Medicina Internacia Revuo
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 26
• Issue: 105
• Pages: 186-189

Contributors

author

Thomas BOHRER

• Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bamberg General Hospital, Buger Str. 80, 96049 Bamberg/Germany. Tel.: [phone];

author

Michael SCHMIDT

• Department of Pulmonolgy, Center of Internal Medicine, University of Wuerzburg; Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080 Wuerzburg/Germany.

author

Johannes KOENIGSHAUSEN

• Institute of Philosophy, University of Wuerzburg; Josef-Stangl-Place, Wuerzburg/Germany

References

• 1. Hartzband, P.; Groopman, J. Money and the changing culture of medicine. NEJM 2009, 360, 100-103.
• 2. Shanafelt, T.D.; Balch, C.M.; Bechamps, G.; Russell, T.; Dyrbye, L.; Satele, D.; Collicott, P.; Novotny, P.J.; Sloan, J.; Freischlag, J. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann. Surg. 2010, 251, 995-1000.
• 3. Bohrer, T.; Koller, M.; Schlitt, H.P.; Bauer, H. Workload and quality of life of surgeons - Results and implications of a large scale survey by the German Society of Surgery. Langenbeck´s Arch. Surg. 2011, 396, 669-676.
• 4. German Medical Charges Manual (Gebuehrenordnung fuer Aerzte of 22. Dezember 1999 (B GBI. I S. 2626 ff.).
• 5. Tomasello, M.; Carpenter, M.; Call, J.; Behne, T.;& Moll, H. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. 2005, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675 - 691.
• 6. Haberecht, A.; Jung, M.; Wessel-Ellermann, M. Media theories. In: MedienKulturWiki, 2008: http://www.leuphana.de/medienkulturwiki/medienkulturwiki2/ index.php?oldid=536 (accessed Nov 23, 2015).
• 7. Wallace, J.E.; Lemaire, J.B.; Ghali, W.A. Physician wellness: a missing quality indicator. Lancet 2010, 374, 1714-1721.

• Document Type: minireview