Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2019 | 129 | 72-84
Article title

Voting Advice Applications as tools for researching and influencing voters: agenda setting and framing in European VAAs

Title variants
Languages of publication
Voting Advice Applications are getting more and more popular throughout Europe and a lot of research prove that they have effects both on turnout and decisions of the electorate. This paper brings up the issue of possible agenda setting and framing effects which occur during the process of statements choice and construction in four European VAAs. Its aim is to check whether the statements are well-balanced or whether they suggest users a certain ideology, which is vital because if such an ideological bias is present in the Voting Advice Applications, it may influence the voters’ political decisions. The research also checks whether the statements focus on the European levels of elections or include also internal political conflicts as well as what the main topics covered by the VAAs are. The outcomes prove that the bias in the medium of Voting Advice Applications is noteworthy, especially when it comes to pro-/anti-European Union dimension. The research also proves that there are a lot of statements which did not focus on the European level of the election as well as shows a map of dominant topics present in all European VAAs.
Physical description
  • Institute of Journalism, Media and Social Communication, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland
  • [1] Anderson J., Fosgen T. (2014). Voting Advice Applications and Political Theory: Citizenship, Participation and Representation. W: D. Garzia, S. Marschall (red.). Matching voters with parties and candidates. Voting advice applications in comparative perspective (p. 217-226). Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • [2] Dalton R.J. (2000). The Decline of Party Identifications. W: R.J. Dalton, M.P. Wattenberg (red.). Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (p. 19-36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • [3] Delli Carpini M.X., Keeter S. (1996). What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • [4] Entman R.M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 4, 51-58.
  • [5] Entman R.M. (2007). Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power. Journal of Communication, 57, 163-173.
  • [6] Franklin M.N., Mackie T., Valen H. (1992). Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western countries. Cambridge: ECPR Press.
  • [7] Garzia D., Marschall S. (2014). The Lausanne Declaration on Voting Advice Applications. W: D. Garzia, S. Marschall (red.). Matching voters with parties and candidates. Voting advice applications in comparative perspective (p. 227-228). Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • [8] Garzia D., Trechsel A.H. i in. (2014). Indirect Campaigning: Past, Present and Future of Voting Advice Applications. W: B. Grofman, A.H. Trechsel, M. Franklin (red.). The Internet and Democracy in Global Perspective (p. 25-41). Cham: Springer.
  • [9] Gemenis K., (2013). Estimating parties’ positions through voting advice applications: some methodological considerations. Acta Politica, 48, 268–295
  • [10] Gemenis K., Rosema M. (2014). Voting Advice Applications and electoral turnout. Electoral Studies, 36, 281-289
  • [11] Krouwel A., Vitiello T., Wall M. (2014). Voting Advice Applications as Campaign Actors: Mapping VAAs’ Interactions with Parties, Media and Voters. W: D. Garzia, S. Marschall (red.). Matching voters with parties and candidates. Voting advice applications in comparative perspective (s. 67-78). Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • [12] Lorenc K. (2018). Dobór i konstrukcja twierdzeń kwestionariusza w nawigatorach wyborczych (Voting Advice Applications): od problemów metodologicznych po ideologię. e-Politikon, 25, 183-202
  • [13] McCombs M. (2005). A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future. Journalism Studies, 4, 543-557.
  • [14] McCombs M., Shaw D. (1972). The Agenda Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
  • [15] Rabinowitz G., Macdonald S.E. (1989). A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. The American Political Science Review, 1, 93-121
  • [16] Ramonite A. (2010). Voting Advice Applications in Lithuania: Promoting Programmatic Competition or Breeding Populism? Policy & Internet, 1, 117-147
  • [17] Scheufele D.A., Iyengar Sh. (2012). The State of Framing Research: A Call for New Directions. W: K. Kenski, K.H. Jamieson (red.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication (s. 619-632). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • [18] Scheufele D.A., Tewksbury D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57, p. 9-20.
  • [19] Van Camp K., Lefevere J.M., Walgrave S. (2014). The content and formulation of statements in voting advice applications: a comparative analysis of 26 VAAs. W: D. Garzia, S. Marschall (red.). Matching voters with parties and candidates: voting advice applications in comparative perspective (p. 11-32). Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • [20] Walgrave S. et al. (2009). Voting Aid Applications and the Effect of Statement Selection. West European Politics, 6, 1161–1180
  • [21] Wall M., Krouwel A., Vitiello T. (2014). Do voters follow the recommendations of voter advice application websites? A study of the effects of on its users’ vote choices in the 2010 Dutch legislative elections. Party Politics, 20, 416–428
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.