Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2017 | 77 | 2 | 140-158
Article title

Appraisal of Abuja Master Plan Using GIS: A Case Study of Abuja Phase I, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria

Title variants
Languages of publication
The study designed and created a geospatial database for the entities in the study area. The database was subjected to test by issuing single criterion and multiple criteria queries. The single criterion query was issued to test the database on the number of parcels in the study area that are equal to or less than 1500 m2. This is the standard area of a plot when the Abuja Master plan was conceptualized. The query returned 642 parcels out of the 1490 parcels in the study area representing 43.09 percent of the total. The multiple criteria query was issued to show those parcels with more than 25,000 m2 and are developed. The query returned less than 1 percent; that is 11 parcels fall into this category. Buffering was carried out to see the level of compliance of buildings with the 3.0m setback from the fencing walls and the result returned 1725 buildings out of the 3822 buildings within the study area that did not comply with this rule. The parcels were also subjected to a setback of 20m from the river channels in the study area. The rivers were buffered with 20m and overlaid with the parcels. 133 parcels fall within the buffer zone. This is about 8.92 percent of the total parcels in the study area. The implication is that over 90 percent are safe in case there is flooding that spreads around that distance. Graduated colour renderer was used to classify the parcels using the sizes as parameter for the classification.
Physical description
  • Department of Geographic Information Systems, Federal School of Surveying, Oyo, Nigeria
  • Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Federal School of Surveying, Oyo, Nigeria
  • Federal Capital Development Authority, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
  • [1] Myers, G. A. (2011). African cities: Alternative visions of urban theory and practice. London: Zed Books.
  • [2] Abubakar, I. R. & Doan, P. L. (2010). New towns in Africa: Modernity and/or decentralization? Presented at the African studies association 53rd annual meetings, November 18–21, San Francisco, USA.
  • [3] M. Zolotareva, New trends of urban development in Russian in the 18th century, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism 41 (1) (2017). Accessed on 19th May, 2017. p. 1
  • [4] F. Savini, Self-Organization and Urban Development: Disaggregating the City Region, Deconstructing Urbanity in Amsterdam, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research (2017). Accessed from Wiley Online Library on 19th May, 2017 p. 2
  • [5] D. Gallacher, Drone Applications for Environmental Management in Urban Spaces: A Review. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning 3 (4) (2016) 1-14
  • [6] S. Ajike and A. Anjolajesu, Examining the Lagos Green Initiative: A Case Study of Kosofe Local Government. International Journal of Sustainable Land use and Urban Planning 3(3) (2016) 1-7
  • [7] Abubakar, I. R., Abuja City Profile. Cities, 41 (2014) 81-91
  • [8] Kemp, K. K. (2008). Encyclopedia of Geographic Information Science. Sage Publications Inc., 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320.
  • [9] Oyo State Urban and Regional Planning Board (2011). Planning Standards in Oyo State.
  • [10] Environmental Systems Research Institute (2014). ArcGIS 10.2.2 Instruction Manual.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.