Towards a General Theory of Fighting Arts

• Authors: Wojciech Cynarski
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Introduction: The fighting arts are an interesting area for researchers from many scientific disciplines around the world. Scientific investigations need to choose appropriate theory, language and methods. The first theory that gives us a special language is the Humanistic Theory of Martial Arts, HTMA. The second is the Anthropology of Martial Arts, AMA. The problem considered in this study is how we should study the martial arts & combat sports & systems, or ‘combatives’; what theoretical framework should we use. It is the author’s proposal for a scientific perspective which should be useful; an elaboration the Humanistic Theory of Martial Arts (HTMA) and definitions, the General Theory of Fighting Arts (GTFA), and the Anthropology of Martial Arts. Methodology: Participant observation, and qualitative content analysis of the literature were used. Methodology of research (in the area of the fighting arts) was also analyzed. Results and Discussion: General Theory of Fighting Arts – GTFA. In the GTFA we can study and explain a broad area of fighting arts and the related problems. These are: 1. Cultural areas of martial arts & combat sports & combat systems (according to AMA and HTMA); 2. Teaching concepts (technical and tactical issues), combat strategy (for self-defence and in combat sports), aspects of real fighting – interdisciplinary; 3. Bio-technical issues – from the perspective of sports sciences. The Research methodology for traditional East Asian martial arts requires its own practice and a high level of sophistication – at best, in more than one martial art. It is a qualitative method of participant observation associated with the experience of metaphysical dimensions. This special method is the ‘shugyo’ (Jap. shūgyō) – psychophysical study and experience from practicing psycho-physical systems. Michael Maliszewski was one of first researchers using this method. Conclusion: The GTFA is the sum of HTMA (humanistic, social and cultural issues), AMA (philosophical, cultural and biological approaches), and a part of Sport Sciences, for coaching, bio-technical and bio-medical issues, the methodology of teaching, etc. The GTFA now created should give us the opportunity to research and explain complicated problems of fighting arts, according to this new, holistic paradigm.

Keywords

EN

anthropology; combat sport; fighting art; martial art; physical culture

• Publisher: Institute of Physical Education and Tourism. Jan Długosz University of Czestochowa
• Journal: Physical Activity Review
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 5
• Pages: 83-90

Contributors

author

Wojciech Cynarski

• Faculty of PE, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow

References

• 1. Szajna G, Kunysz M, Cynarski WJ. “Martial arts, combat sports, humanism - budō, kakugi, jindō”, 2nd International Scientific Conference of Experts – Researchers on Martial Arts and Humanists, Targowiska-Krosno, April 25th-26th, 2008. Archives of Budo 2008, 4: 56-58
• 2. Cynarski WJ. Budo, Martial Arts and Combat Sports – Definitions, Ideas, Theories. Research Journal of Budo 2013, 45(3): 222-241
• 3. Nakiri F. Concept of budo and the history and activities of the Japanese Academy of Budo. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2015, 15(1): 11-25; doi: 10.14589/ido.15.1.2
• 4. Cynarski WJ, Kubala K. JAB and IMACSSS Conference – Tsukuba 2013. On scientific, budo studies and cultural tourism. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2013, 13(4): 25-34
• 5. Pawelec P, Słopecki J, Sieber L, Rut P. Scientific and martial arts' tourism. The case study of the 3rd IMACSSS International Conference and Congress. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2015, 15(1): 46–56; doi: 10.14589/ido.15.1.7
• 6. Matsunaga H et al.: Budo: The Martial Way of Japan. Tokyo: Nippon Budokan, 2009
• 7. Sasaki T. Budo (the martial arts) as Japanese culture: the outlook on the techniques and the outlook on the human being. In: W.J. Cynarski [ed.], Martial Arts and Combat Sports – Humanistic Outlook, Rzeszow: Rzeszow University Press, 2009: 12-19
• 8. Cynarski WJ. Anthropology of Martial Arts. Studies and Essays from Sociology and Philosophy of Martial Arts. Rzeszow: Rzeszow University Press, 2012
• 9. Krippendorf K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousend Oaks, Ca: Sage, 2004
• 10. Tokarski S. Martial arts. Active forms of expression in the philosophy of the East. Szczecin: Glob, 1989
• 11. Tokarski S. The second Renaissance. Eliade’s theory of cross-cultural dialogues. Kultura i Społeczeństwo 1976, 1: 149-163
• 12. Cynarski WJ. Budo martial arts in the western culture. WSP, Rzeszow 2000
• 13. Obodynski K. Anthropology of martial arts as a scientific perspective for research. In: W.J. Cynarski [ed.], Martial Arts and Combat Sports – Humanistic Outlook. Rzeszow: UR, 2009: 35-50.
• 14. Fromm E. To Have or To Be. Warsaw: Klub Otrycki, 1989
• 15. Szyszko-Bohusz A. Holistic Pedagogy and Theory of Genetic Immortality related to combat sports and martial arts in the contemporary epoch of globalisation, science and technology. In: W.J. Cynarski [ed.], Martial Arts and Combat Sports – Humanistic Outlook, Rzeszów: Rzeszów University Press, 2009: 62-68.
• 16. Prigogine I, Stengers I. La Nouvelle Alliance. Métamorphose de la science. Paris: Gallimard, 1978
• 17. Capra F: The Turning Point. Science, Society, and the Rising Culture. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1982
• 18. Raimondo S, Coccia G, Ceccarelli G. Martial Arts and Contemporary Dance. Rhythmic Convergences of the Human Body. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2013, 13(2): 20–26; doi: 10.14589/ido.13.2.2
• 19. Cynarski WJ. The New Paradigm of Science Suitable for the 21st Century. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014, 149: 269-275
• 20. Krawczyk Z [ed.]: Sociology of Physical Culture. AWF Warsaw 1995
• 21. Kim D, Back A. The Way do Go: Philosophy in Martial Arts Practice. Seoul: Nanam, 2000
• 22. Bolelli D. On the Warrior’s Path. Philosophy, Fighting, and Martial Arts Mythology. Berkeley, CA: Blue Snake Books, 2008
• 23. Cynarski WJ, Sieber L, Szajna G. Martial arts in physical culture. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2014, 14(4): 39–45; doi: 10.14589/ido.14.4.5
• 24. Cynarski WJ, Yu JH, Warchol K, Bartik P: Martial arts in psycho-physical culture. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2015, 15(4): 33-38; doi: 10.14589/ido.15.4.5
• 25. Cynarski WJ, Skowron J. An analysis of the conceptual language used for the general theory of martial arts - Japanese, Polish and English terminology. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2014, 14(3): 49-66; doi: 10.14589/ido.14.3.7
• 26. Wąsik J,Pieter W. Sport sparring concept in taekwon-do – The Christmas tree diagram. Physical Activity Review 2013, 1:32-37
• 27. Wąsik J. Three Areas of Taekwon-do Identification and Practice. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology” 2014, 14(3): 22–26 DOI: 10.14589/ido.14.3.3
• 28. Wąsik J, Grygiel Ł. Taekwon-do. Postawy treningu tradycyjnego. Projack, Częstochowa 2012
• 29. Cynarski WJ, Sieber L. Towards a general theory of fighting arts. In: Cynarski W.J. (ed). Martial Arts Phenomenon – Research and Multidisciplinary Interpretation. Rzeszów: Rzeszów University Press, 2012: 16-26.
• 30. Cynarski WJ. Martial Arts Phenomenon – Research and Multidisciplinary Interpretation. Rzeszow: Rzeszow University Press, 2012
• 31. Cynarski WJ. W kierunku nowej, humanistycznej nauki o człowieku. Antropologia psychofizycznego postępu. Idō – Ruch dla Kultury / Movement for Culture 2000, 1: 99-103
• 32. Wojtyła K. Osoba i czyn oraz inne studia antropologiczne [Person and act, and other anthropological studies]. Lublin: TN KUL, 1994
• 33. Jones DE [ed.]. Combat, Ritual, and Performance. Anthropology of the Martial Arts. Westport, Connecticut – London. Praeger, 2002
• 34. Cynarski WJ. General reflections about the philosophy of martial arts. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2013, 13(3): 1–6
• 35. Cynarski WJ. Martial Arts – Ido & Idokan. Rzeszow: IPA, 2009
• 36. Brizin D, Kernspecht KR. Introduction to Combat Logic – A General Theory. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2014, 14(4): 24–30; doi: 10.14589/ido.14.4.3
• 37. Słopecki J, Böschen P, Macas H, Litwiniuk A. The reality of teaching self-defence as a desired model of education. Scientific Review of Physical Culture 2015, 3: 119-130
• 38. Cynarski WJ. The meaning of self-defence: an expert definition. A contribution to the theory of self-defence and combat. In: M. Zvonař, Z. Sajdlová [eds.], Proceedings of 10th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KINANTHROPOLOGY: "Sport and Quality of Life", MU, Brno, Nov. 18-20, 2015: 463-474
• 39. Cynarski WJ. Non-entertaining excursion in the perspective of the systemic-holistic anthropology of tourism. In: I. Jirasek, J. Kosiewicz, D.N. Roberson [eds.], Sport and Physical Education in the Mirror of the Social Sciences. 3rd Conference of the ISSSS, Palacky University, Fac Phys Culture, Olomouc, http://apps.webofknowledge.com, 2012: 124-130
• 40. Cynarski WJ, Sieber L, Mytskan T. Study trip to Munich. Casus of scientific and martial arts tourism. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2015, 15(4): 49–57; doi: 10.14589/ido.15.4.7
• 41. Anderson AD. Asian martial arts cinema, dance, and the cultural languages of gender, Asian Journal of Communication 2001, 11(2): 58-78
• 42. Cynarski WJ. Martial Arts Phenomenon in Mass Culture, Physical Education and Sport 2001, 2: 261-270
• 43. Cieszkowski S, Sieber L. Far Eastern martial arts in the perspective of cultural sciences. International Journal of Eastern Sports & Physical Education 2006, 4(1): 217-226
• 44. Sieber L, Cieszkowski S. Far Eastern martial arts in the perspective of cultural sciences AD 2008. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2009, 9: 123-129
• 45. Spencer DC. Ultimate fighting and embodiment. Violence, gender, and Mixed Martial Arts. New York: Routledge, 2012
• 46. Zeng HZ, Cynarski WJ, Xie L. Martial Arts Anthropology, Participants’ Motivation and Behaviours. Martial Arts in Chanshu: Participants’ Motivation, Practice Times and Health Behaviours. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2013
• 47. Zeng HZ, Cynarski WJ. Participation of Taekwondo Athletes / Students. Saarbrücken: LAP/Lambert Academic Publishing, 2016
• 48. Maliszewski M. Spiritual Dimensions of the Martial Arts. Rutland-Tokyo: C.E. Tuttle Company, 1996
• 49. Cynarski WJ. Humanities in the study of Budo – problems and methodology. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2013, 13(4): 1-6; doi: 10.14589/ido.13.4.1
• 50. Cynarski WJ. Polish achievements in the theory of physical education and new directions. Ido Movement for Culture. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology 2014, 14 (2): 1–14; doi: 10.14589/ido.14.2.1

• Document Type: paper