PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2016 | 5 | 33-41
Article title

Wastewater reuse

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Once freshwater has been used for an economic or beneficial purpose, it is generally discarded as waste. In many countries, these wastewaters are discharged, either as untreated waste or as treated effluent, into natural watercourses, from which they are abstracted for further use after undergoing "self-purification" within the stream. Through this system of indirect reuse, wastewater may be reused up to a dozen times or more before being discharged to the sea. Such indirect reuse is common in the larger river systems of Latin America. However, more direct reuse is also possible: the technology to reclaim wastewaters as potable or process waters is a technically feasible option for agricultural and some industrial purposes (such as for cooling water or sanitary flushing), and is a largely experimental option for the supply of domestic water. Wastewater reuse for drinking raises public health, and possibly religious, concerns among consumers. The adoption of wastewater treatment and subsequent reuse as a means of supplying freshwater is also determined by economic factors. Human excreta and wastewater contains useful materials. These are water, organic carbon and nutrients and should be regarded as a resource. In their natural cycles, they are broken down by micro-organisms and become accessible to plants and animals, thus sustaining natural ecosystems. When improperly disposed, these substances can cause pollution. This is because the organic materials exert oxygen demand, and the nutrients promote algal growth in lakes, rivers and near-shore marine environments. Human excreta and wastewater also contain pathogens. Reuse of the wastes must ensure that public health is maintained. Planned reuse is the key to wastewater reuse. Planning for reuse ensures that public health and protection of the environment are taken into account. Reuse of treated wastewater for irrigation of crops, for example, will need to meet (i) standards for indicator pathogens, and (ii) plant requirement for water, nitrogen and phosphorus. WHO and others have developed standards for reuse of wastewater for various purposes. Further details of these standards can be found in the Regional Overviews in the Source Book, published by IWA and IETC. It must be pointed out, however, that requirements for water and nutrients are plant-specific and site-specific (dependent on soil type and climate), and information on these requirements need to be obtained from local information sources.
Year
Volume
5
Pages
33-41
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology, 17 Słowackiego Str., 71-434 Szczecin, Poland
  • Faculty of Biology, University of Szczecin, 13 Waska Street, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland
author
  • The Board of Marine Ports of Szczecin and Świnoujście S.A., Environment and Health Research Laboratory, 7 Bytomska Street, 70-603 Szczecin, Poland
References
  • [1] Ackermann GE, Schwaiger J, Negele RD, Fent K (2002). Effects of long-term nonylphenol exposure on gonadal development and biomarkers of estrogenicity in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat Toxicol 60(3-4): 203-221
  • [2] An L, Hu J, Yang M (2008). Evaluation of estrogenicity of sewage effluent and reclaimed water using vitellogenin as a biomarker. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(1): 154-158
  • [3] Aragonés-Beltrána P, Mendoza-Rocab J A , Bes-Piáa A et al. (2009). Application of multi-criteria decision analysis to jar-test results for chemicals selection in the physical–chemical treatment of textile wastewater. Journal of Hazardous Materials 164 (2009), pp. 288-295.
  • [4] Balkema, A., Weijers S., and Lambert F. (1998). On Methodologies for Comparison of Wastewater Treatment Systems with Respect to Sustainability. Conference “Options for Closed Water Systems”, 11-13 March, 1998, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • [5] Belton, V., Stewart, T., (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • [6] Bila D, Montalvao AF, Azevedo DdA, Dezotti M (2007). Estrogenic activity removal of 17β-estradiol by ozonation and identification of by-products. Chemosphere 69(5):736-746
  • [7] Bjerregaard LB, Madsen AH, Korsgaard B, Bjerregaard P (2006). Gonad histology and vitellogenin concentrations in brown trout (Salmo trutta) from Danish streams impacted by sewage effluent. Ecotoxicology 15(3):315-327
  • [8] Bjerregaard P, Hansen PR, Larsen KJ, Erratico C, Korsgaard B, Holbech H (2008). Vitellogenin as a biomarker for estrogenic effects in brown trout, Salmo trutta: laboratory and field investigations. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(11):2387-2396
  • [9] Bolong N, Ismail A, Salim MR, Matsuura T (2009). A review of the effects of emerging contaminants in wastewater and options for their removal. Desalination 239(1):229-246
  • [10] Bradford, A.; Brook, R.; Hunshal, C. S. 2003. Wastewater irrigation in Hubli–Dharwad, India: Implications for health and livelihoods. Environment and Urbanization 15(2): 157-170.
  • [11] Brechet T., Tulkens H. (2009). Beyond BAT: Selecting optimal combinations of available techniques, with an example from the limestone industry. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (2009), pp. 1790-1801.
  • [12] Bruvold, W. 1988. Public opinion on water reuse options. Journal WPCF 60(1): 45-49.
  • [13] Buechler, S.; Mekala, G. D.; Raschid-Sally, L. 2002. Livelihoods and Wastewater Irrigated Agriculture along the Musi River in Hyderabad City, Andhra Pradesh, India. Urban Agriculture Magazine 8: 14-17.
  • [14] Chattopadhyay, K. 2004. Jalabhumir Kolkata – a fact-finding observation of East Calcutta Wetlands. Kolkata (publisher unknown).
  • [15] Copeland PA, Sumpter JP, Walker TK, Croft M (1986). Vitellogenin levels in male and female rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri richardson) at various stages of the reproductive cycle. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B Comp Biochem 83(2): 487-493
  • [16] Davey, A.; Miller, P.; Knops, F. 2005. Australia’s Largest Ultra-Filtration Reclaimed Water Plant, Water 32(2), March 2005.
  • [17] Georgopoulou, E., Hontou, V., Gakis et al. (2008), BEAsT: a decision-support tool for assessing the environmental benefits and the economic attractiveness of best available techniques in industry. Journal of Cleaner Production Vol. 16, No 3.
  • [18] Jobling S (1998) Natural and anthropogenic environmental oestrogens: the scientific basis for risk assessment. Pure Appl Chem 70(9): 1805-1827
  • [19] Kime DE, Nash JP, Scott AP (1999) Vitellogenesis as a biomarker of reproductive disruption by xenobiotics. Aquaculture 177(1-4): 345-352
  • [20] Lange R, Hutchinson TH, Croudace CP, Siegmund F, Schweinfurth H, Hampe P, et al. (2001) Effects of the synthetic estrogen 17 alpha-ethinylestradiol on the life-cycle of the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 20(6):1216-1227.
  • [21] Pickering A, Pottinger T, Carragher J (1989) Differences in the sensitivity of brown trout, Salmo trutta L., and rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson, to physiological doses of cortisol. J Fish Biol 34(5): 757-768
  • [22] Purdom CE, Hardiman PA, Bye VVJ, Eno NC, Tyler CR, Sumpter JP (1994). Estrogenic Effects of Effluents from Sewage Treatment Works. Chem Ecol 8(4): 275-285.
  • [23] Routledge EJ, Sheahan D, Desbrow C, Brighty GC, Waldock M, Sumpter JP (1998). Identification of estrogenic chemicals in STW effluent. 2. In vivo responses in trout and roach. Environ Sci Technol 32(11): 1559-1565
  • [24] Schmidt H, Bernet D, Wahli T, Meier W, Burkhardt-Holm P (1999). Active biomonitoring with brown trout and rainbow trout in diluted sewage plant effluents. J Fish Biol 54(3): 585-596
  • [25] Schneeberger HU (1995). Abklärungen zum Gesundheitszustand von Regenbogenforelle (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Bachforelle (Salmo trutta fario) und Groppe (Cottus gobio) im Liechtensteiner, Werdenberger- und Rheintaler-Binnenkanal [Inaugural Dissertation]: University of Bern, Bern
  • [26] Stalter D, Magdeburg A, Wagner M, Oehlmann J (2011). Ozonation and activated carbon treatment of sewage effluents: removal of endocrine activity and cytotoxicity. Water Res 45(3): 1015-1024
  • [27] Stalter D, Magdeburg A, Weil M, Knacker T, Oehlmann J (2010). Toxication or detoxication? In vivo toxicity assessment of ozonation as advanced wastewater treatment with the rainbow trout. Water Res 44(2): 439-448
  • [28] Sumpter JP (1998). Xenoendocrine disrupters—environmental impacts. Toxicol Lett 102: 337-342
  • [29] Sumpter JP, Jobling S (1995). Vitellogenesis as a biomarker for estrogenic contamination of the aquatic environment. Environ Health Perspect 103 (Suppl 7): 173
  • [30] Triebskorn R, Amler K, Blaha L, Gallert C, Giebner S, Güde H, et al. (2013). SchussenAktivplus: reduction of micropollutants and of potentially pathogenic bacteria for further water quality improvement of the river Schussen, a tributary of Lake Constance, Germany. Environ Sci Eur 25(1): 1-9
  • [31] Triebskorn R, Hetzenauer H (2012). Micropollutants in three tributaries of Lake Constance, Argen, Schussen and Seefelder Aach: a literature review. Environ Sci Eur 24(1): 1-24
  • [32] Tyler CR, van Aerle R, Hutchinson TH, Maddix S, Trip H (1999). An in vivo testing system for endocrine disruptors in fish early life stages using induction of vitellogenin. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(2): 337-347
  • [33] Spijkerman E, Coesel PFM, 1998. Alkaline phosphatase activity in two planktonic desmid species and the possible role of an extracellular envelope. Freshw Biol 39: 503-513. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00299.x
  • [34] Štrojsová A, Vrba J, Nedoma J, Komárková J, Znachor P, 2003. Seasonal study on expression of extracellular phosphatases in the phytoplankton of an eutrophic reservoir. Eur J Phycol 38: 295-306 doi:10.1080/09670260310001612628
  • [35] Štrojsová A, Vrba J, Nedoma J, Šimek K, 2005. Extracellular phosphatase activity of freshwater phytoplankton exposed to different in situ phosphorus concentrations. Mar Freshw Res 56: 417-424 doi:10.1071/MF04283
  • [36] Taga N, Kobori H, 1978. Phosphatase activity in eutrophic Tokyo Bay. J. Mar Biol (Berl) 49: 223-229. doi:10.1007/BF00391134
  • [37] Vrba J, Komárková J, Vyhnálek V, 1993. Enhanced activity of alkaline phosphatases-phytoplankton response to epilimnetic phosphorus depletion. Water Sci Technol 28: 15-24
  • [38] Yu S., Hea Z.L., Stoffellaa P.J., Calverta D.V., Yanga X.E., Banksa D.J., Baligar V.C., 2006. Surface runoff phosphorus (P) loss in relation to phosphatase activity and soil P fractions in Florida sandy soils under citrus production. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38, 619-628.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-9b6590f8-454d-4855-8b5d-b497cb51413d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.