Demographic factors and physical activity of female undergraduates

• Authors: Alena Buková , Klaudia Zusková , Lenka Szerdiová , Zuzana Küchelová
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Introduction:University years play an important role in building healthy lifestyle patterns and attitudes towards physical activity (PA) and sport. Regarding PA, female students are a riskier group than males. The environment can play an important role both as a barrier but also as support for PA. While researching PA in individual population groups, an ecological approach has to be taken into account. The aim of the research was to broaden knowledge about the underlying physical activity of female undergraduates in relation to selected demographic indicators, namely to urban and rural residence, its size in terms of population and the person's current place of residence during her studies. In monitoring PA, we focused on the frequency of sports activity, including exercise. Methods: The cohort of this cross-sectional study consisted of 1.630 female undergraduates from two universities in Eastern Slovakia. The research was carried out as part of the grant-aided VEGA Project No. 1/1343/12 "Selected risk factors of obesity and its prevention through physical activity" addressed by the Institute of Physical Education and Sport at P.J. Šafárik University (UPJŠ) in Košice. Data on frequency and regularity of doing sports, including exercise, during the previous half a year, the place of residence (city/country), population of residence, and the current place of residence during their studies were collected via a set of questions in a survey questionnaire designed for the purposes of the above research study. Data were processed using SPSS 23 software program. To find out the correlation between doing sport activities and selected demographic variables, the Spearman Chi quadrate test and the Cramer coefficient of association were used. Results: Female students of both universities demonstrated low levels of engagement with sport activity and exercise in terms of the frequency and regularity of its performance in a week over the previous half year. We found significant correlation between the frequency of the sports activity by the undergraduates and the place of their permanent residence, with a result favouring city dwellers against the countryside. Paradoxically, there is no significant correlation regarding the number of inhabitants at the place of residence, although we can observe a certain positive tendency in favor of agglomerations with a population of over 50,000. The factor of the current place of residence during university studies proved to be insignificant.

Keywords

EN

demographic indicators; exercise; female undergraduates; sport activity

• Publisher: Institute of Physical Education and Tourism. Jan Długosz University of Czestochowa
• Journal: Physical Activity Review
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 5
• Pages: 202-211

Contributors

author

Alena Buková

• University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice, Institute of Physical Education and Sport

author

Klaudia Zusková

• University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice, Institute of Physical Education and Sport

author

Lenka Szerdiová

• University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice, Faculty of Medicine

author

Zuzana Küchelová

• University of P. J. Šafárik in Košice, Institute of Physical Education and Sport

References

• 1. Wilmore JH. Costill DL. Physiology of sport and exercise. Human Kinetics, 2004.
• 2. Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. The Lancet, 2012, 380 (9838): 294-305.
• 3. Compas BE, Wagner BM, Slavin LA, Vannatta K. A prospective study of life events, social support, and psychological symptomatology during the transition from high school to college. Am J. Commun Psychol 1986, 14: 241–57.
• 4. World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. 2010. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/9789241599979/en/
• 5. Zusková K, Buková A, Bakalár P, Brtková M, Küchelová Z, Hančová M. Nadhmotnosť a obezita u vysokoškolákov. Univerzita Pavla Jozefa Šafárika v Košiciach, 2015. ISBN 9788081523892.
• 6. Loyd-Richardson EE, Bailey S, Fava JL, Wing R. A prospective study of weight gain during the college freshman and sophomore years. Preventive Medicine, 2009, 48 (3): 256 - 261.
• 7. Leslie E, Sparling PB, Owen N. University campus settings and the promotion of physical activity in young adults: lessom from research in Australia and the USA. In: Health Education 2001, 101(3): 116-125.
• 8. Bray SR, Born HA. Transition to university and vigorous physical activity: Implications for health and psychological well-being. In: Journal of Am.College Health, 2004, 52(4): 181-188.
• 9. Gajdošík J, Baláš J. Zájem o pohybové aktivity u studentů medicíny Univerzity Karlovy. In: Studia Sportiva 2012, 6(2): 62-69. ISSN 1802-7679.
• 10. Plotnikoff RC, Costigan SA, Williams RL. Effectiveness of interventions targeting physical activity, nutrition and healthy weight for university and college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2015, 12:45. DOI 10.1186/s12966-015-0203-7.
• 11. Korn L, Gonen E, Shaked Y, Golan M. Health perception, self and body image, physical activity and nutrition among undergraduate students in Israel. In: PLoS One, 2013, 8(3). http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058543.
• 12. Steptoe A, Wardle J. Health behaviour, risk awareness and emotional wellbeing in students from Easter Europe and Western Europe. Soc. Sci. Med., 2001, 53, 1621-1630.
• 13. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF. Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet 2012, 380, 258–271.
• 14. Sallis JF, Bowles HR, Bauman A. Neighborhood environments and physical activity among adults in 11 countries. Amer. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 36, 484–490.
• 15. Duncan MJ, Spence JC, Mummery WK. Perceived environment and physical activity: A meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. Int J. Behav Nutr Phys. Act. 2005, 2. DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-2-11.
• 16. Frank LD, Engelke PO. The built environment and human activity patterns: exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. J. Planning Literature 2001,16:202-218.
• 17. Bebčáková V, Lenková R, Boržíková I, Durkáč P, Frömel K, Chmelík F. Pohybová aktivita 15 ročných žiakov základných škôl. Sborník příspěvků z mezinárodní vědecké konference pohyb člověka, Ostrava, 2010: 17-23
• 18. Hiana TCh, Mahmud ZF, Choong TY. Physical Fitness Level between Urban and Rural Students-Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 90: 847 – 852.
• 19. Regis MF, DeOlivera LMF et al. Urban versus rural lifestyle in adolescents: associations between environment, physical activity levels and sedentary behavior. Einstein, 2016, 14(4): 461-467.
• 20. Vitáriušová E, Babinská K, Rosinský J. et al. Fyzická aktivita a skladba voľného času v populácii detí na Slovensku. Pediatr. prax, 2009, 10(2): 94-97.
• 21. VanDyck D,Cardon G, Deforche B, DeBourdeaudhuij. Urban–rural differences in physical activity in Belgian adults and the importance of psychosocial factors. Journal of Urban Health, 2011 88 (1): 154-167.
• 22. Hoffmann K, Bryl W, Marcinkowski, JT, et al. Estimation of physical activity and prevalence of excessive body mass in rural and urban Polish adolescents. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, 2011, 18(2): 398-403.
• 23. Parks SE, Housemann RA, Brownson RC. Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2003, 57(1): 29-35.
• 24. Wilcox S, Castro C, King AC, et al. Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. J.Epidemiol. Community Health, 2000, 54: 667-672.
• 25. Helmer, SM, Krämer A, Mikolajczyk RT. Health-related locus of control and health behaviour among university students in North Rhine Westphalia, Germany. In: BMC Research Notes 2012, 5:703. Dostupné na: http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1756-0500/5/703.
• 26. Nykodým J, Zvonař M, Sebera M. Pohybová aktivita studentů Masarykovy univerzity. Studia Sportiva 2011, 5(1): 57-64.
• 27. Radu LE, Făgăraş PS, Vanvu G. Physical Activity Index of Female University Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 191, 1763-1766.
• 28. Kimáková T, Čarnogurská D, Korchňáková, M, Schuster, J. Porovnávacia štúdia vybraných fyziologických a antropometrických parametrov ovplyvňujúcich životný štýl vysokoškolákov medicínskych a nemedicínskych. Studia Kinanthropologica 2013, 14 (3): 205-207.
• 29. Telleria-Aramburu et al. Influence of Sport Practice and Physical Exercise on Anthropometric Indicators and Weight Satisfaction in Men University Students: A Pilot Study. Nutricion Hospitalaria, 2015, 31(3): 1225 – 1231.
• 30. Sparling PB, Snow TK, Physical activity patterns in recent college alumni. In: Res. Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2002, 73(2): 200-205.
• 31. Buková A, Gajdošová B, Staško I. Športové a telovýchovné aktivity študentov UPJŠ. In: Optimalizácia zaťaženia v telesnej a športovej: výchove. Zborník z medzinárodnej vedeckej konferencie. Bratislava: Strojnícka fakulta STU 2008, 1-5. ISBN 9788022728522.
• 32. Mitáš J, Frömel K. Pohybová aktivita dospělé populace české republiky: přehled základních ukazatelů za období 2005 – 2009. Tělesná kultura 2011, 34(1): 9-21.
• 33. Frömel K, Mitáš J, Kerr J. The associations between active lifestyle, the size of a community and SES of the adult population in the Czech Republic. Health & Place 2009, 15(2): 447–454.
• 34. Řepka E, Šebrle Z, Fromel K, Chmelík F, Vašíčková Z. Plnění doporučení k týdenní pohybové aktivitě dospělou populací jihočeského regionu. Tělesná kultúra 2011, 34(1): 65-75.
• 35. Martin SL, Kirkner GJ, Mayo K, Matthews CE, Durstine JL, Hebert JR. Urban, rural, and regional variations in physical activity. The Journal of Rural Health, 2005, 21(3): 239–244.
• 36. LaCaille LJ, Dauner KN, Krambeer RJ, Pedersen J. Psychosocial and Environmental Determinants of Eating Behaviors, Physical Activity, and Weight Change Among College Students: A Qualitative Analysis. J. of Am. College Health 2011, 59(6).
• 37. Mihalopoulos NL, Auinger P, Klein JD. The freshman 15: Is it real? Journal of American College Health 2008, 56: 531–53.
• 38. Deliens T, Deforche D, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Clarys P. Determinants of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions. BioMed Central Public Health 2015, 15:201: 1-9 [http://www.biomedcentral.com/ 1471-2458/15/201]
• 39. Bernasovská K, Rimárová K, Kovářová M. Posúdenie životného štýlu poslucháčov Lekárskej fakulty UPJŠ v Košiciach In: Životné podmienky a zdravie: zborník vedeckých prác. Bratislava, 2003: 273-279. ISBN 80-7159-138-6.
• 40. Wallmann-Sperlich B, Froboese I, Schantz P. Physical Activity and the Perceived Neighbourhood Environment — Looking at the Association the Other Way Around. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11: 8093-8111. DOI 10.3390/ijerph110808093.
• 41. Szerla M, Ortenburger D, Kluszczyński M, Wyszomierska J. Exercise and psychological factors in low back pain. Physical Activity Review 2017, 5:6-9. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.16926/par.2017.05.02
• 42. Ortenburger D, Rodziewicz-Gruhn J, Wąsik J, Marfina O, Polina N. Selected problems of the relation between pain-immunity and depression, Physical Activity Review 2017, 5:74-77. DOI: dx.doi.org/10.16926/par.2017.05.10

• Document Type: paper