Badanie USG 3D w pediatrii

• Authors: Michael Riccabona

Title variants

EN

Editorial review: pediatric 3D ultrasound

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Three-dimensional ultrasound is an established diagnostic imaging technique in many
specialties. However, in neonates, infants and children three-dimensional ultrasound
still is underutilized, partially due to time constraints for post-processing and restricted
availability, of devices as well as dedicated pediatric transducers. Also reimbursement
issues still need to be addressed. This editorial review presents more or less established
pediatric three-dimensional ultrasound applications with proven diagnostic benefi t as
well as potential future applications of three-dimensional/four-dimensional ultrasound
in infants and children, aiming at enhancing research and promoting practical use
of three-dimensional ultrasound in relevant pediatric conditions. Particularly, applications
in neonatal neurosonography, ultrasound of the urogenital tract as well as some
other small part and miscellaneous queries are highlighted. Additional other potential
and future indications are discussed briefl y, also mentioning restrictions and potential
future developments. In summary, three-dimensional ultrasound holds some potential
to widen sonographic diagnostic capabilities throughout childhood and hopefully will
be increasingly investigated and introduced into clinical practice provided respective
equipment and pediatric three-dimensional/four-dimensional ultrasound transducers
become available.

PL

Ultrasonografi a trójwymiarowa znalazła uznanie wśród specjalistów wielu dziedzin
medycyny, jednak nadal wykorzystywana jest w niedostatecznym stopniu w badaniu
noworodków, niemowląt i dzieci. Powodem tego są przeszkody wynikające z wydłużenia
czasu badania oraz ograniczonej dostępności aparatów ultrasonografi cznych
i odpowiednich, pediatrycznych głowic; nie bez znaczenia pozostaje również kwestia
refundacji badań. W pracy przedstawiono możliwości zastosowania ultrasonografi i trójwymiarowej
we wskazaniach o udowodnionej wartości diagnostycznej oraz potencjalne
przyszłe obszary praktycznego zastosowania badania z użyciem opcji trójwymiarowej
i czterowymiarowej u niemowląt i dzieci. Omówiono użyteczność tych technik w neurosonografi
i, badaniach układu moczowo-płciowego i obrazowaniu drobnych struktur
anatomicznych, a także przedstawiono ograniczenia oraz prawdopodobne kierunki
rozwoju. Autor wnioskuje, że ultrasonografi a trójwymiarowa umożliwia poszerzenie
diagnostyki obrazowej w pediatrii, jednak upowszechnienie metody uzależnione jest od
zwiększenia dostępności odpowiedniej aparatury.

Keywords

EN

children; dzieci; neurosonografia; neurosonography; pediatria; pediatrics; three-dimensional ultrasound; układ moczowo-płciowy; ultrasonografia trójwymiarowa; urogenital tract

Discipline

• MEDICINE: MEDICINE

• Publisher: Medical Communications
• Journal: Journal of Ultrasonography
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 56
• Pages: 5–20

Contributors

author

Michael Riccabona

• Department of Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Graz, Austria

References

• 1. Riccabona M, Pertorius D, Nelson TR: Three-dimensional ultrasound – pediatric applications. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: S34.
• 2. Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne NG: Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses. Gynecol Oncol 1995; 59: 129–135.
• 3. Delcker A, Diener HC: Quantifi cation of atherosclerotic plaques in carotid arteries by three-dimensional ultrasound. Br J Radiol 1994; 67: 672–678.
• 4. Downey DB, Fenster A: Three-dimensional ultrasound: a maturing technology. Ultrasound Q 1998; 14: 25–40.
• 5. Ebert AK, Falkert A, Germer U, Rösch WH: Biometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus assessed by three-dimensional ultrasound in females with bladder exstrophy-epispadias complex after functional reconstruction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 98–103.
• 6. Fine D, Perring S, Herbetko J, Hacking CN, Fleming JS, Dewbury KC: Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the gallbladder and dilated biliary tree: reconstruction from real-time B-scans. Br J Radiol 1991; 64: 1056–1057.
• 7. Gruboeck K, Jurkovic D, Lawton F, Savvas M, Tailor A, Campbell S: The diagnostic value of endometrial thickness and volume measurements by three-dimensional ultrasound in patients with postmenopausal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 272–276.
• 8. Johnson DD, Pretorius DH, Riccabona M, Budorick NE, Nelson TR: Three-dimensional ultrasound of the fetal spine. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 434–438.
• 9. Jurkovic D, Geipel A, Gruboeck K, Jauniaux E, Natucci M, Campbell S: Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 233–237.
• 10. Merz E, Bahlmann F, Weber G: Volume scanning in the evaluation of fetal malformations: a new dimension in prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 5: 222–227.
• 11. Merz E (ed.): 3-D Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia – New York – Baltimore 1998.
• 12. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Sklansky M, Hagen-Ansert S: Three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of fetal heart anatomy and function: acquisition, analysis, and display. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 1–9.
• 13. Pooh RK, Maeda K, Pooh KH, Kurjak A: Sonographic assessment of fetal brain morphology. Prenat Neonat Med 1999; 4: 18–38.
• 14. Pretorius DH, House MH, Nelson TR, Hollenbach KA: Evaluation of normal and abnormal lips in fetuses: comparison between three- and twodimensional sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 1233–1237.
• 15. Pretorius DH, Nelson TR: Fetal face visualization using three-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1995; 14: 349–356.
• 16. Pretorius DH, Nelson TR: Three-dimensional ultrasound in gynecology and obstetrics: a review. Ultrasound Q 1998; 14: 218–233.
• 17. Riccabona M, Johnson DD, Pretorius DH, Nelson TR: Three-dimensional ultrasound: display modalities in the fetal spine and thorax. Eur J Radiol 1996; 22: 141–145.
• 18. Sohn C, Lenz GP, Thies M, Grotepass J: [Three-dimensional organ image using ultrasound]. Ultraschall Med 1990; 11: 295–301.
• 19. Steiner H, Staudach A, Spitzer D, Schaffer H: Three-dimensional ultrasound in obstetrics and gynaecology: technique, possibilities and limitations. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1773–1778.
• 20. De Odorico I, Spaulding KA, Pretorius DH, Lev-Toaff AS, Bailey TB, Nelson TR: Normal splenic volumes estimated using three-dimensional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 231–236.
• 21. Elliot TL, Downey DB, Tong S, McLean CA, Fenster A: Accuracy of prostate volume measurements in vitro using three-dimensional ultrasound. Acad Radiol 1996; 3: 401–406.
• 22. Gilja OH, Thune N, Matre K, Hausken T, Odegaard S, Berstad A: In vitro evaluation of three-dimensional ultrasonography in volume estimation of abdominal organs. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 157–165.
• 23. Hashimoto S, Goto H, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Ishiguro Y, Kojima S et al.: An evaluation of three-dimensional ultrasonography for the measurement of gallbladder volume. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 3492–3496.
• 24. Kirbach D, Whittingham TA: 3-D ultrasound – the Kretztechnik Voluson, R approach. Eur J Ultrasound 1994; 1: 85–89.
• 25. Nelson TR, Downey DB, Pretorius DH, Fenster A: Three-Dimensional Ultrasound. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 1999.
• 26. Riccabona M, Nelson TR, Pretorius DH: Three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of distance and volume measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 429–434.
• 27. Tong S, Cardinal HN, McLoughlin RF, Downey DB, Fenster A: Intraand inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 673–681.
• 28. Weinraub Z, Maymon R, Shulman A, Bukovsky J, Kratochwil A, Lee A et al.: Three-dimensional saline contrast hysterosonography and surface rendering of uterine cavity pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 277–282.
• 29. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Hull A, Riccabona M, Sklansky MS, James G: Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 374–383.
• 30. Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE, Mayberry P: Three-dimensional transvaginal neurosonography of the fetal brain: “navigating” in the volume scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 16: 307–313.
• 31. Pooh RK, Maeda K, Pooh KH, Kurjak A: Sonographic assessment of the fetal brain morphology. Prenat Neonat Med 1999; 4: 18–38.
• 32. Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Mayberry P: Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of the fetal brain: the three horn view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 16: 302–306.
• 33. Csutak R, Weninger M, Vergesslich K: Dreidimensionale Sonographie – Neue Perspektiven der zerebralen Ultraschalldiagnostik bei Neugeborenen. Ultraschall Med 1999; 20: S124.
• 34. Fritz GA, Riccabona M, Weitzer C, Deutschmann HA, Resch B: Dreidimensionaler Ultraschall (3DUS) des neonatalen Gehirns: klinische Anwendbarkeit bei intensivgepfl egten Neugeborenen. Ultraschall Med 2005; 26: 299–306.
• 35. Salerno CC, Pretorius DH, Hilton SW, O’Boyle MK, Hull AD, James GM et al.: Three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging of the neonatal brain in high-risk neonates: preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 549–555.
• 36. Stanojevic M, Hafner T, Kurjak A: Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound – a useful imaging technique in the assessment of neonatal brain. J Perinat Med 2002; 30: 74–83.
• 37. Abdul-Khaliq H, Lange PE, Vogel M: Feasibility of brain volumetric analysis and reconstruction of images by transfontanel three-dimensional ultrasound. J Neuroimaging 2000; 10: 147–150.
• 38. Csutak R, Unterassinger L, Weninger M, Rohrmeister Kl, Wandl-Vergesslich K: Three-dimensional (3-D) quantifi cation of ventricular volume – new perspectives in the evaluation of ventricular size in neonates. Pediatr Radiol 1999; 32: S385.
• 39. Gilmore JH, Gerig G, Specter B, Charles HC, Wilber JS, Hertzberg BS et al.: Infant cerebral ventricle volume: a comparison of 3-D ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 1143–1146.
• 40. Kampmann W, Walka MM, Vogel M, Obladen M: 3-D sonographic volume measurement of the cerebral ventricular system: in vitro validation. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998; 24: 1169–1174.
• 41. Nagdyman N, Walka MM, Kampmann W, Stöver B, Obladen M: 3-D ultrasound quantifi cation of neonatal cerebral ventricles in different head positions. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 895–900.
• 42. Riccabona M, Nelson TR, Resch B, Pretorius DP: Potential of threedimensional ultrasound in neonatal and pediatric neurosonography: a pictorial essay. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2082–2093.
• 43. Uggowitzer MM, Kugler C, Riccabona M, Klein GE, Leber K, Simbrunner J et al.: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: diagnostic value of echo-enhanced transcranial Doppler sonography compared with angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 101–106.
• 44. Lyden PD, Nelson TR: Visualization of the cerebral circulation using three-dimensional transcranial power Doppler ultrasound imaging. J Neuroimaging 1997; 7: 35–39.
• 45. Riccabona M, Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Davidson TE: In vivo threedimensional sonographic measurement of organ volume: validation in the urinary bladder. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 627–632.
• 46. Fritz GA, Riccabona M, Bohdal G, Quehenberger F: [Accuracy of renal volume assessment in children using three-dimensional sonography]. Rofo 2003; 175: 540–546.
• 47. Gilja OH, Smievoll AI, Thune N, Matre K, Hausken T, Odegaard S et al.: In vivo comparison of 3D ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in volume estimation of human kidneys. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995; 21: 25–32.
• 48. Matre K, Stokke EM, Martens D, Gilja OH: In vitro volume estimation of kidneys using three-dimensional ultrasonography and a position sensor. Eur J Ultrasound 1999; 10: 65–73.
• 49. Riccabona M, Fritz GA, Schollnast H, Schwarz T, Deutschmann MJ, Mache CJ: Hydronephrotic kidney: pediatric three-dimensional US for relative renal size assessment – initial experience. Radiology 2005; 236: 276–283.
• 50. Riccabona M, Fritz G, Ring E: Potential applications of three-dimensional ultrasound in the pediatric urinary tract: pictorial demonstration based on preliminary results. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2680–2687.
• 51. Dahia N: Virtual cystoscopy using 3D ultrasound in evaluation of urinary bladder lesions. J Ultrasound Med 2006; 25: S82.
• 52. Oswald J, Schwentner C, Lunacek A, Deibl M, Bartsch G, Radmayr C: Age and lean body weight related growth curves of kidneys using real-time 3-dimensional ultrasound in pediatric urology. J Urol 2004; 172: 1991–1994.
• 53. Pichler R, Buttazzoni A, Bektic J, Schlenck B, Radmayr C, Rehder P et al.: Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral refl ux using dextranomer/ hyaluronic acid copolymer in children: results of postoperative followup with real-time 3D sonography. Urol Int 2011; 87: 192–198.
• 54. Riccabona M, Pilhatsch A, Haberlik A, Ring E: Three-dimensional ultrasonography- based virtual cystoscopy of the pediatric urinary bladder: a preliminary report on feasibility and potential value. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 1453–1459.
• 55. Burton P, Deng J, McDonald D, Fewtrell MS: Real-time 3D ultrasound imaging of infant tongue movements during breast-feeding. Early Hum Dev 2013; 89: 635–641.
• 56. Sohn C, Lenz GP, Thies M: Three-dimensional ultrasound of the infant hip. Ultraschall Med 1990; 11: 302–305.
• 57. Schlögl S, Werner E, Lassmann M, Terekhova J, Muffert S, Seybold S et al.: The use of three-dimensional ultrasound for thyroid volumetry. Thyroid 2001; 11: 569–574.
• 58. Cavaye DM, Tabbara MR, Kopchok GE, Laas TE, White RA: Threedimensional vascular ultrasound imaging. Am Surg 1991; 57: 751–755.
• 59. Downey DB, Fenster A: Vascular imaging with a three-dimensional power Doppler system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 665–668.
• 60. Keberle M, Jenett M, Hahn D: Clinical trial on the accuracy of a freehand and sensor-independent three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound system measuring diameters, volumes and vascularity of malignant primaries of the neck. Ultraschall Med 2001; 22: 91–95.
• 61. Hünerbein M, Raschke M, Haas NP, Schlag PM: Three-dimensional ultrasonography: new prospects for ultrasound imaging of bone. Lancet 2000; 355: 116–117.
• 62. Riccabona M: Pediatric three-dimensional ultrasound: basics and potential clinical value. Clin Imaging 2005; 29: 1–5.
• 63. Valsky DV, Yagel S: Three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonography of the pelvic fl oor: improving visualization for new clinical applications and better functional assessment. J Ultrasound Med 2007; 26: 1373–1387.
• 64. Acar P, Saliba Z, Aggoun Y, Butera G, Bonnet D, Iserin L et al.: [A new anatomical approach to congenital valve diseases by three-dimensional echocardiography]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1999; 92: 583–590.
• 65. Nelson TR, Pretorius DH, Sklansky M, Hagen-Ansert S: Three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of fetal heart anatomy and function: acquisition, analysis, and display. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 1–9.
• 66. Marx GR, Sherwood MC: Three-dimensional echocardiography in congenital heart disease: a continuum of unfi lled promises? No. A presently clinically applicable technology with an important future? Yes. Pediatr Cardiol 2002; 23: 266–285.
• 67. Seward JB, Belohlavek M, O’Leary PW, Foley DA, Greenleaf JF: Congenital heart disease: wide-fi eld, three-dimensional, and four-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Am J Cardiac Imaging 1995; 9: 38–43.

• Document Type: article