Assessment of the physical and chemical quality of groundwater in developed rural areas: health and environmental issues in the municipality of Koudougou, Burkina Faso

• Authors: Boureima Yo , Joseph Yaméogo , Pawendkisgou Isidore Yanogo
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In rural Sahelian territories, groundwater represents the main source of drinking water supply. However, the physicochemical quality of groundwater abstracted from boreholes implemented within rural development projects remains insufficiently documented, even though it is a key factor for the environmental and health sustainability of such investments. This study aims to assess the physicochemical quality of groundwater from two boreholes constructed under the Emergency Territorial Development and Resilience Project (PUDTR) in the municipality of Koudougou, Central-West Burkina Faso, and to analyze their environmental and territorial implications. The methodology is based on water sampling conducted in July 2025 during the rainy season, followed by physicochemical analyses carried out in an accredited laboratory. The analyzed parameters include pH, temperature, turbidity, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, major ions, nitrogen compounds, iron, and nutrients. The results were interpreted through comparison with the World Health Organization (WHO) drinking water quality guidelines, combined with a geographical approach integrating environmental context and territorial dynamics. The results indicate that all analyzed parameters comply with WHO guideline values, reflecting good overall groundwater quality. The waters show low mineralization, low nitrate and iron concentrations, and no significant chemical pollution, despite the agricultural context and the active groundwater recharge period. However, the low buffering capacity of the waters highlights their potential vulnerability to future anthropogenic pressures. These findings provide a valuable baseline for sustainable territorial planning and groundwater management in rural areas benefiting from hydraulic infrastructure projects.

Keywords

EN

Groundwater; Koudougou; Physicochemical water quality; Rural boreholes

Discipline

• ENVIRONMENT_&_ECOLOGY: ENVIRONMENT & ECOLOGY

• Publisher: Scientific Publishing House „DARWIN”
• Journal: World News of Natural Sciences
• Year: 2026
• Volume: 64
• Pages: 205-221

Contributors

author

Boureima Yo

• Department of Geography, Norbert ZONGO University, Koudougou, Burkina Faso

author

Joseph Yaméogo

• Department of Human Sciences and Society, Ziniaré University Center/Joseph KI-ZERBO University, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

author

Pawendkisgou Isidore Yanogo

• Department of Geography, Norbert ZONGO University, Koudougou, Burkina Faso

References

• [1] Adebanjo. A. S. (2021). Assessment of Drinking Waters Quality Collected from Boreholes in Afe Babalola University Ado-Ekiti (ABUAD). Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences 384, 81-84
• [2] Bagre. A. S., Savadogo. L. G. & Zombre. N. P. (2016). Évaluation environnementale des projets d’infrastructures rurales en Afrique de l’Ouest : enjeux et perspectives. Ouagadougou: Presses Universitaires du Burkina Faso.
• [3] Brown. R. M., McClelland. N. I., Deininger. R. A. & O’Connor. M. F. (1972). A water quality index — crashing the psychological barrier. In Indicators of Environmental Quality: Proceedings of a symposium held during the AAAS meeting in Philadelphia. Pennsylvania. December 26–31. 1971 (pp. 173-182). Boston. MA: Springer US.
• [4] Edmunds. W. M. & Smedley. P. L. (2013). Fluoride in natural waters. In O. Selinus (Ed.). Essentials of medical geology (pp. 311–336). Dordrecht. Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4375-5_15
• [5] Chaurasia. A. K., Pandey. H. K., Tiwari. S. K., Prakash. R., Pandey. P. & Ram. A. (2018). Groundwater quality assessment using water quality index (WQI) in parts of Varanasi District. Uttar Pradesh. India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 92(1), 76-82
• [6] Chidiac. S., El Najjar. P., Ouaini. N., El Rayess. Y. & El Azzi. D. (2023). A comprehensive review of water quality indices (WQIs): history. models. attempts and perspectives. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 22(2). 349-395
• [7] Doneen. L. D. (1964). Notes on water quality in agriculture. Department of Water Science and Engineering. University of California. Davis.
• [8] Foster. S. & Chilton. J. (2003). Groundwater: The processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 358(1440), 1957-1972. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1380
• [9] Foster. S., Tuinhof. A., Kemper. K., Garduño. H., & Nanni. M. (2018). Urban groundwater resilience: A new paradigm. Washington. DC: World Bank.
• [10] Gaye. C. B. & Tindimugaya. C. (2019). Groundwater resources in Africa. Paris. France: UNESCO Publishing.
• [11] Kumar. P. R., Gowd. S. S. & Krupavathi. C. (2024). Groundwater quality evaluation using water quality index and geospatial techniques in parts of Anantapur District. Andhra Pradesh. South India. HydroResearch 7, 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2024.01.001
• [12] Howard. G., Bartram. J., Pedley. S. Schmoll. O., Chorus. I. & Berger. P. (2006). Groundwater and public health. Geneva. Switzerland: World Health Organization.
• [13] Jourda. J. P.. Kouamé. K. J.. Saley. M. B.. & Biemi. J. (2007). Groundwater vulnerability mapping in crystalline basement areas: Application of the DRASTIC method in Côte d’Ivoire. Environmental Geology 52(4), 677-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0502-7
• [14] Lachhab. A. (2019). Water quality index of natural streams: A case study of five headwater streams in Bald Eagle State Forest. Pennsylvania. American Journal of Water Resources 7(4), 128-135
• [15] Lapworth. D. J., Nkhuwa. D. C. W., Okotto-Okotto. J., Pedley. S., Stuart. M. E., Tijani. M. N., & Wright. J. (2017). Urban groundwater quality in sub-Saharan Africa: Current status and implications for water security and public health. Hydrogeology Journal 25(4), 1093-1116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1516-6
• [16] Liu. X., Zhu. Y., Bennett. J. M., Wu. L. & Li. H. (2022). Effects of sodium adsorption ratio and electrolyte concentration on soil saturated hydraulic conductivity. Geoderma 414, 115772
• [17] Quirk. J. P. & Schofield. R. K. (1955). The effect of electrolyte concentration on soil permeability. European Journal of Soil Science 6(2), 163-178
• [18] Richards. L. A. (Ed.). (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils (No. 60). US Government Printing Office.
• [19] Taylor. R. G., Scanlon. B., Döll. P., Rodell. M., Van Beek. R., Wada. Y.., Treidel. H. (2013). Ground water and climate change. Nature Climate Change 3(4), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1744
• [20] U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Handbook No. 60. US Department of Agriculture. Washington. DC.
• [21] Wilcox. L. (1955). Classification and use of irrigation waters (No. 969). US Department of Agriculture.
• [22] World Health Organization. (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality (4th ed. incorporating the 1st addendum). Geneva. Switzerland: WHO Press.
• [23] Yaméogo, J. (2025). Trends and prediction of extreme precipitation indices in three cities of Burkina Faso using non-parametric statistics and the Holt-Winters smoothing method. Meteorology Hydrology and Water Management 13(1), 1-30

• Document Type: article