Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2018 | 105 | 134-144
Article title

Cardiac Autonomic Control during Alternate Nostril Breathing in Subjects Novice to Yoga Practice

Title variants
Languages of publication
Objectives: To examine heart rate variability during alternate nostril breathing (ANB) in a group of individuals novice to yoga practice and to compare the effects of ANB to that of paced breathing (PB) at the same respiratory rate. Design: The study involved randomized repeated measures of two different breathing patterns. Participants: Twenty healthy individuals (22.3 ± 2.9 years) participated. Intervention: Subjects were asked to rest for 5 minutes (PRE-ANB and PRE-PB) before they participated in two different breathing exercises (ANB and PB) in a random order for 30 min. Outcome Measures: Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate variability (HRV) were measured during PRE-ANB, PRE-PB, ANB, and PB and compared using analysis of variance. HRV was reported as frequency and time domain parameters. Total power (TP; 0.0-0.4 Hz), low- (LF; 0.04-0.15 Hz), and high-frequency (HF; 0.15-0.40 Hz) ranges were selected and were natural log (ln) transformed. Time domain variables such as RMSSD, pNN50, and SDNN were also reported. Results: There was a main effect of breathing condition on HR and MAP (p < 0.05 for both) such that HR was higher during PRE-ANB and ANB compared to PRE-PB and PB and that MAP was greater during ANB compared to the other conditions. There were main effects of time on lnTP, lnLF, and lnHF (p < 0.001 for all) such that lnTP and lnLF were greater and lnHF was lower during ANB and PB compared to the PRE conditions. There was a breathing x time interaction on lnLF/lnHF (p <0.05) such that it was greater during PB compared to ANB and that it was greater during ANB and PB compared to PRE-ANB and PRE-PB. There was a main effect of breathing on pNN50 such as that it was lower during Pre ANB and ANB. There was also a main effect of time on SDNN such that it was higher during PB and ANB. No significant changes were noted in RMSSD measurements during any conditions. Conclusions: During both ANB and PB, there was a decrease in parasympathetic and/or increase sympathetic control of the heart. Additionally, ANB may result in less of a reduction in parasympathetic control than PB.
Physical description
  • Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
  • Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
  • [1] Stiles, M. Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. Newburyport, Red Wheel/Weiser 2001.
  • [2] Ghiya S, Lee CM. Influence of alternate nostril breathing on heart rate variability in non-practitioners of yogic breathing. Int J Yoga. 2012 Jan; 5(1): 66-9.
  • [3] Pal GK, Velkumary S, Madanmohan T. Effect of short-term practice of breathing exercises on autonomic functions in normal human volunteers. Indian J Med Res 2004; 120: 115-121.
  • [4] Srivastava RD, Jain N, Singhal A. Influence of alternate nostril breathing on cardiorespiratory and autonomic functions in healthy young adults. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2005; 49: 475-483.
  • [5] Upadhyay Dhungel K, Malhotra V, Sarkar D, Prajapati R. Effect of alternate nostril breathing exercise on cardiorespiratory functions. Nepal Med Coll J 2008; 10: 25-27.
  • [6] Mourya M, Mahajan AS, Singh NP, Jain AK. Effect of Slow-and Fast-Breathing Exercises on Autonomic Functions in Patients with Essential Hypertension. J Altern Complement Med 2009; 15: 711–717.
  • [7] Sinha AN, Deepak D, Gusain VS. Assessment of the effects of pranayama/alternate nostril breathing on the parasympathetic nervous system in young adults. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 May; 7(5): 821-3.
  • [8] Telles, S., Yadav, A., Kumar, N., Sharma, S., Visweswaraiah, N. K., & Balkrishna, A. Blood pressure and Purdue pegboard scores in individuals with hypertension after alternate nostril breathing, breath awareness, and no intervention. Med Sci Monit. 2013; 19: 61–66.
  • [9] Raghuraj P, Telles S. Immediate effect of specific nostril manipulating yoga breathing practices on autonomic and respiratory variables. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2008; 33: 65-75.
  • [10] Bhagat OL, Kharya C, Jaryal A, Deepak KK. Acute effects on cardiovascular oscillations during controlled slow yogic breathing. Indian J Med Res. 2017 Apr; 145(4): 503–512.
  • [11] 11. Telles, S., Sharma, S. K., & Balkrishna, A. Blood pressure and heart rate variability during yoga-based alternate nostril breathing practice and breath awareness. Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2014; 20: 184–193
  • [12] Hayano J, Mukai S, Sakakibara M, Okada A, Takata K, Fujinami T. Effects of respiratory interval on vagal modulation of heart rate. Am J Physiol. 1994 Jul; 267(1 Pt 2): H33-40.
  • [13] 13. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circulation 1996; 93: 1043-1065.
  • [14] Bernardi L, Porta C, Spicuzza L, Bellwon J, Spadacini G, Frey AW, Yeung LY, Sanderson JE, Pedretti R, Tramarin R. Slow breathing increases arterial baroreflex sensitivity in patients with chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2002 Jan 15; 105(2): 143-145.
  • [15] Joseph CN, Porta C, Casucci G, Casiraghi N, Maffeis M, Rossi M, Bernardi L. Slow breathing improves arterial baroreflex sensitivity and decreases blood pressure in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2005 Oct; 46(4): 714-718.
  • [16] Saoji AA, Raghavendra BR, Manjunath NK. Effects of yogic breath regulation: A narrative review of scientific evidence. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2018 Jan 30. pii: S0975-9476(17) 30322-4.
  • [17] Jorna, PG. Spectral analysis of heart rate and psychological state: a review of its validity as a workload index. Biol Psychol 1992; 34: 237-257.
  • [18] Saoji AA, Raghavendra BR, Manjunath NK. Immediate Effects of Yoga Breathing with Intermittent Breath Retention on the Autonomic and Cardiovascular Variables Amongst Healthy Volunteers. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018; 62(1): 41-50.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.