PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2020 | 146 | 36-46
Article title

Primary Response and Concern of Sabah’s Geopark Potential Economic Effects: Preliminary Study

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Sabah, Malaysia is moving steps forward by announcing the gazettement of some areas as geoparks. Part of the areas include the district of Ranau, Kota Marudu and Kota Belud. Some of the areas involved if not all are under a national park program prior to this. This gazettement undoubtedly has the potential to bring economic benefit to the state. It has the potential to increase land value, stimulating economic activities especially in the services sector via tourism activities, enhancing protection for environment and as a mean to control aggressive use of land for development. On the other hand, there are some concerns of stakeholders. Issues such as potential restriction for farmers to do agriculture related activities and relocation of village among others are potential concern among communities in Ranau, Kota Marudu and Kota Belud. In this regard, in order to examine the real concerns of various stakeholders, some series of roundtable discussions and interviews have been undertaken. Based on the preliminary assessment, very small number of individuals have worry about the geopark idea. Majority look at it positively.
Keywords
Year
Volume
146
Pages
36-46
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
author
  • Faculty of Business, Economics and Accountancy, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
References
  • [1] Brilha J. Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: a review. Geoheritage (2016) 8: 119-134
  • [2] Brilha J. Geoheritage and geoparks. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: assessment, protection and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, (2018) pp 323-335
  • [3] Canesin T, Brilha J, Díaz-Martínez E. Best Practices and Constraints in Geopark Management: Comparative Analysis of Two Spanish UNESCO Global Geoparks. Geoheritage (2020) 12: 14
  • [4] Sinnyovsky, D., Sachkov, D., Tsvetkova, I. et al. Geomorphosite Characterization Method for the Purpose of an Aspiring Geopark Application Dossier on the Example of Maritsa Cirque Complex in Geopark Rila, Rila Mountain, SW Bulgaria. Geoheritage 12, 26 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00451-w
  • [5] Rosado-González, E.M., Sá, A.A. & Palacio-Prieto, J.L. UNESCO Global Geoparks in Latin America and the Caribbean, and Their Contribution to Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals. Geoheritage 12, 36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00459-2
  • [6] El Hadi H, Tahiri A, Simancas JF, González-Lodeiro F, Azor A, Martínez-Poyatos D. Geoheritage in Morocco: the Neoproterozoic Ophiolite of Bou Azzer Central Anti-Atlas. Geoheritage (2011) 3: 89-96
  • [7] El Haibi H, El Hadi H, Tahiri A, Bensalah I, El Maidani A. Les roches magmatiques et pyroclastiques du conglomerat strunien de l'oued tiflet meseta nord occidentale marocaine : petrographie, geochimie et provenance. European Scientific Journal (2015) 11(5): 171-186
  • [8] Farsani NT, Coelho C, Costa C. Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas. International Journal of Tourism Research (2011), 13(1): 68-81
  • [9] Fuertes-Gutiérrez I, Fernández-Martínez E. Geosites inventory in the Leon Province (northwestern Spain): a tool to introduce geoheritage into regional environmental management. Geoheritage (2010) 2(1-2): 57-75
  • [10] Henriques MH, Brilha J. UNESCO Global Geoparks: a strategy towards global understanding and sustainability. Episodes (2017) 40(4): 349-355
  • [11] Carvalho, I.S., Henriques, M.H., Castro, A.R.S.F. et al. Promotion of the Geological Heritage of Araripe Unesco Global Geopark, Brazil: the Casa da Pedra Reference Center. Geoheritage 12, 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00452-9
  • [12] Khoukhouchi M, Errami E, Hassou N, Irzan E. The geomorphological heritage of the Oualidia and Sidi Moussa lagoons: assessment and promotion for a sustainable human and socio-economic development. Journal of Scientific Research and Studies (2018) 5(4): 73-87
  • [13] Lima FF, Brilha JB, Salamuni E. Inventorying geological heritage in large territories: a methodological proposal applied to Brazil. Geoheritage (2010) 2(3-4): 92-99
  • [14] Oukassou M, BoumirKh BK, Ouarhache D, Lagnaoui A, Charrière A. The Tichoukt massif, a geotouristic play in the folded Middle Atlas Morocco. Geoheritage (2019) 11(2): 371-379
  • [15] Piranha JM, Del Lama EA, Bacci DLC. Geoparks in Brazil - strategy of geoconservation and development. Geoheritage (2011) 3(4): 289-298
  • [16] Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C, Lausanne. A method for assessing “scientific” and “additional values” of geomorphosites. Geol Helvetica (2007) 62(3): 148-158
  • [17] Reynard E, Perret A, Bussard J, Grangier L, Martin S. Integrated approach for the inventory and management of geomorphological heritage at the regional scale. Geoheritage (2016) 8: 43-60
  • [18] Mehdioui, S., El Hadi, H., Tahiri, A. et al. Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites in Rabat-Tiflet Region (North Western Morocco): Preliminary Study to Evaluate the Potential of the Area to Become a Geopark. Geoheritage 12, 35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00456-5
  • [19] Canesin, T.S., Brilha, J. & Díaz-Martínez, E. Best Practices and Constraints in Geopark Management: Comparative Analysis of Two Spanish UNESCO Global Geoparks. Geoheritage 12, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00435-w
  • [20] Zouros NC. The European geoparks network: geological heritage protection and local development. Episodes (2004) 27(3): 165-171
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-888238f6-72f2-440a-985c-98896d22e95e
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.