PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2018 | 18 | 72 | 29–36
Article title

Diagnostic accuracy of sonoelastography in different diseases

Content
Title variants
PL
Wartość diagnostyczna sonoelastografii w różnych jednostkach chorobowych
Languages of publication
EN PL
Abstracts
EN
The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sonoelastography in patients of primary and secondary health care settings. Google scholar, PubMed, Medline, Medscape, Wikipedia and NCBI were searched in October 2017 for all original studies and review articles to identify the relevant material. Two reviewers independently selected articles for evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of sonoelastography in different diseases based on titles and abstracts retrieved by the literature search. The accuracy of sonoelastography in different diseases was used as the index text, while B-mode sonography, micro pure imaging, surgery and histological findings were used as reference texts. Superficial lymph nodes, neck nodules, malignancy in thyroid nodules, benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes, thyroid nodules, prostate carcinoma, benign and malignant breast abnormalities, liver diseases, parotid and salivary gland masses, pancreatic masses, musculoskeletal diseases and renal disorders were target conditions. The data extracted by the two reviewers concerning selected study characteristics and results were presented in tables and figures. In total, 46 studies were found for breast masses, lymph nodes, prostate carcinoma, liver diseases, salivary and parotid gland diseases, pancreatic masses, musculoskeletal diseases and renal diseases, and the overall sensitivity of sonoelastography in diagnosing all these diseases was 83.14% while specificity was 81.41%. This literature review demonstrates that sonoelastography is characterized by high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing different disorders of the body.
PL
Celem badania była ocena dokładności diagnostycznej sonoelastografii u chorych leczonych w warunkach placówek podstawowej i specjalistycznej opieki zdrowotnej. W październiku 2017 roku dokonano przeglądu baz danych Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, Medscape, Wikipedia oraz NCBI w celu pozyskania prac oryginalnych i poglądowych, które stanowiły materiał do badania. Prace wybierało dwóch badaczy niezależnie. Oceniono dokładność sonoelastografii w diagnostyce różnych chorób na podstawie tytułów i streszczeń wyszukanych prac. Główny termin stanowiła „skuteczność sonoelastografii w diagnostyce różnych chorób”, a terminy „ultrasonografia w trybie B-mode”, „obrazowanie MicroPure”, „zabieg operacyjny” i „wynik badania histopatologicznego” stosowano jako terminy referencyjne. Badane patologie dotyczyły: powierzchownych węzłów chłonnych, guzków okolicy szyi, złośliwych guzów tarczycy, łagodnych i złośliwych zmian w węzłach chłonnych szyjnych, guzków tarczycy, raka gruczołu krokowego, łagodnych i złośliwych zmian w piersiach, chorób wątroby, zmian w śliniankach przyusznych i gruczołach ślinowych, zmian w trzustce, chorób układu mięśniowo-szkieletowego oraz chorób nerek. Pozyskane przez dwóch badaczy dane dotyczące charakterystyki ocenianych prac oraz wyniki analizy przedstawiają tabele i ryciny. W sumie wyszukano 46 badań dotyczących zmian w piersiach, węzłów chłonnych, raka gruczołu krokowego, chorób wątroby, chorób gruczołów ślinowych i ślinianek przyusznych, zmian w trzustce, chorób układu mięśniowo-szkieletowego i chorób nerek, a ogólna czułość i swoistość sonoelastografii w diagnostyce tych chorób wynosiły odpowiednio 83,14% i 81,41%. Niniejszy przegląd literatury wskazuje na wysoką czułość i swoistość sonoelastografii w diagnostyce różnych chorób. Artykuł w wersji polskojęzycznej jest dostępny na stronie http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-18-no-72
Discipline
Year
Volume
18
Issue
72
Pages
29–36
Physical description
References
  • 1. Tyagi S, Kumar S: Clinical applications of elastography: An overview. Int J Pharma Bio Sciences 2010; 1: 1–8.
  • 2. Asha V, Upadhyay K: Ultrasound elastography: Implication in the head and neck region. IJSS Case Reports & Reviews 2014; 1: 38–41.
  • 3. Lai C, Yuen M, Fung JY: Clinical application of transient elastography (Fibroscan) in liver diseases. Medical Bulletin 2009; 14: 22–25.
  • 4. Das D, Gupta M, Kaur H, Kalucha A: Elastography: The next step. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 137–141.
  • 5. Zaleska-Dorobisz U, Kaczorowski K, Pawluś A, Puchalska A, Inglot M: Ultrasound elastography: Review of techniques and its clinical applications. Adv Clin Exp Med 2014; 23: 645–655.
  • 6. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga J, Correas JM, Gilja OH et al.: EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical application. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 238–253.
  • 7. Aguiló MA, Aquino W, Brigham JC, Fatemi M: An inverse problem approach for elasticity imaging through vibroacoustics. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010; 29: 1012–1021.
  • 8. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F et al.: EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 169–184.
  • 9. Choi YJ, Lee JH, Baek JH: Ultrasound elastography for evaluation of cervical lymph nodes. Ultrasonography 2015; 34: 157–164.
  • 10. Ying L, Hou Y, Zheng HM, Lin X, Xie ZL, Hu YP: Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 2576–2584.
  • 11. Rubaltelli L, Stramare R, Tregnaghi A, Scagliori E, Cecchelero E, Mannucci M et al.: The role of sonoelastography in the differential diagnosis of neck nodules. J Ultrasound 2009; 12: 93–100.
  • 12. Anvari A, Barr RG, Dhyani M, Samir AE: Clinical application of sonoelastography in thyroid, prostate, kidney, pancreas, and deep venous thrombosis. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40: 709–722.
  • 13. Giovannini M, Botelberge T, Bories E, Pesenti C, Caillol F, Esterni B et al.: Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: A multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1587–1593.
  • 14. Lenghel LM, Bolboaca SD, Botar-Jid C, Baciut G, Dudea SM: The value of a new score for sonoelastographic differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Med Ultrason 2012; 14: 271–277.
  • 15. Dudea SM, Botar-Jid C, Dumitriu D, Vasilescu D, Manole S, Lenghel M: Differentiating benign from malignant superficial lymph nodes with sonoelastography. Med Ultrason 2013; 15: 132–139.
  • 16. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi J, Fukuda H, Tachikake T, Ito K: Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: Comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191: 604–610.
  • 17. Park SH, Kim SJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Son EJ, Kwak JY: Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: W416–W423.
  • 18. Ciledag N, Arda K, Arıbas BK, Aktas E, Köse SK: The utility of ultrasound elastography and MicroPure imaging in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198: W244–W249.
  • 19. Razavi SA, Hadduck TA, Sadigh G, Dwamena BA: Comparative effectiveness of elastographic and B-mode ultrasound criteria for diagnostic discrimination of thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 1317–1326.
  • 20. Teng DK, Wang H, Lin YQ, Sui GQ, Guo F, Sun LN: Value of ultrasound elastography in assessment of enlarged cervical lymph nodes. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012; 13: 2081–2085.
  • 21. Pelzer A, Heinzelbecker J, Kirchner M, Schönberg S, Sroebel P, Dinter D et al.: 2140 real-time elastography compared to 3.0T MRI findings in the localisation and diagnosis of prostate cancer: Preliminary results of a single centre study. J Urol 2010; 183: e832.
  • 22. Miyagawa T, Tsutsumi M, Matsumura T, Kawazoe N, Ishikawa S, Shimokama T et al.: Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Evaluation of elastographic moving images. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2009; 39: 394–398.
  • 23. Sumura M, Mitsui Y, Arichi N, Hiraoka T, Wake K, Honda S et al.: 2010 real-time balloon inflation elastography of prostate might surpass MRI for detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 2010; 183: e780.
  • 24. Kamoi K, Okihara K, Ochiai A, Ukimura O, Mizutani Y, Kawauchi A et al.: The utility of transrectal real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 1025–1032.
  • 25. Salomon G, Köllerman J, Thederan I, Chun FK, Budäus L, Schlomm T et al.: Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: A comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 1354–1362.
  • 26. Pallwein L, Aigner F, Faschingbauer R, Pallwein E, Pinggera G, Bartsch G, Schaefer G, Struve P, Frauscher F: Prostate cancer diagnosis: value of real-time elastography. Abdom Imaging 2008; 33: 729–735.
  • 27. Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P, Pinggera G, Horninger W, Bartsch G et al.: Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 2007; 100: 42–46.
  • 28. Giurgiu CR, Dudea SM, Coman I: Elastography in the early detection of prostate cancer. J Radiother Med Oncol 2010; 16: 89–93.
  • 29. Anvari A, Barr RG, Dhyani M, Samir AE: Clinical application of sonoelastography in thyroid, prostate, kidney, pancreas, and deep venous thrombosis. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40: 709–722.
  • 30. Choi JJ, Kang BJ, Kim SH, Lee JH, Jeong SH, Yim HW et al.: Role of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med 2011; 30: 429–436.
  • 31. Liu H, Jiang YX, Liu JB, Zhu QL, Sun Q, Chang XY: Contrast-enhanced breast ultrasonography: Imaging features with histopathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 911–920.
  • 32. Scaperrotta G, Ferranti C, Costa C, Mariani L, Marchesini M, Suman L et al.: Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 2381–2389.
  • 33. Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA: Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 134: 923–931.
  • 34. Regini E, Bagnera S, Tota D, Campanino P, Luparia A, Barisone F et al.: Role of sonoelastography in characterising breast nodules. Preliminary experience with 120 lesions. Radiol Med 2010; 115: 551–562.
  • 35. Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Andronescu D, Usvat R, Cretoiu D, Baicus C, Marinoschi G: Acoustic radiation force imaging sonoelastography for noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 5525–5532.
  • 36. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F et al.: Transient elastography: A new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1705–1713.
  • 37. Yoneda M, Suzuki K, Kato S, Fujita K, Nozaki Y, Hosono K et al.: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: US-based acoustic radiation force impulse elastography. Radiology 2010; 256: 640–647.
  • 38. Celebi I, Mahmutoglu AS: Early results of real-time qualitative sonoelastography in the evaluation of parotid gland masses: A study with histopathological correlation. Acta Radiol 2013; 54: 35–41.
  • 39. Dumitriu D, Dudea SM, Botar-Jid C, Băciuț G: Ultrasonographic and sonoelastographic features of pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands. Med Ultrason 2010; 12: 175–183.
  • 40. Mateen MA, Muheet KA, Mohan RJ, Rao PN, Majaz HM, Rao GV et al.: Evaluation of ultrasound based acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) and eSie touch sonoelastography for diagnosis of inflammatory pancreatic diseases. JOP 2012; 13: 36–44.
  • 41. Klauser AS, Miyamoto H, Tamegger M, Faschingbauer R, Moriggl B, Klima G et al.: Achilles tendon assessed with sonoelastography: Histologic agreement. Radiology 2013; 267: 837–842.
  • 42. De Zordo T, Lill SR, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Jaschke W, BellmannWeiler R et al.: Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: Comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 180–185.
  • 43. Lee MH, Cha JG, Jin W, Kim BS, Park JS, Lee HK et al.: Utility of sonographic measurement of the common tensor tendon in patients with lateral epicondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 1363–1367.
  • 44. Samir AE, Allegretti AS, Zhu Q, Dhyani M, Anvari A, Sullivan DA et al.: Shear wave elastography in chronic kidney disease: A pilot experience in native kidneys. BMC Nephrol 2015; 16: 119.
  • 45. Yerli H, Eski E, Korucuk E, Kaskati T, Agildere AM: Sonoelastographic qualitative analysis for management of salivary gland masses. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 1083–1089.
  • 46. Klintworth N, Mantsopoulos K, Zenk J, Psychogios G, Iro H, Bozzato A: Sonoelastography of parotid gland tumours: initial experience and identification of characteristic patterns. Eur Radiol 2012; 22(5): 947–956.
Document Type
article
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.psjd-86782b56-fe27-4892-8316-d6bc114ab6f8
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.